№ files_lp_4_process_1_49004
File format: docx
Character count: 3922
File size: 39 KB
Policy position text from a trade union body outlining concerns about tuition-fee-based university funding in the United Kingdom and arguing for a publicly funded higher education model alongside improved pay and financial stability for university staff.
Year:
Not specified
Region / Country:
United Kingdom
Sector:
Higher Education
Topic:
University funding, tuition fees, staff pay, higher education policy
Document Type:
Policy statement
Organization:
UNISON Higher Education Service Group Executive (HESGE)
Author:
UNISON
Related Policy Context:
UK Government White Paper on Post-16 Education and Skills in England
Stakeholders Mentioned:
University staff, students, UK Government, higher education institutions
Geographical Scope:
England, Scotland, Cymru (Wales), Northern Ireland
Key Issues:
Tuition fee funding model, student debt, staff pay erosion, university financial sustainability
Policy Position:
Advocacy for a publicly funded model based on free higher education
Associated Developments:
National reviews on higher education funding in Scotland and Northern Ireland
Affected Groups:
University support staff, academic staff, prospective students
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Martin-Baker America Inc. Johnstown, PA, USA
Industry:
Aerospace / Defense
Document Type:
Job Description
Organization:
Martin-Baker America Inc.
Author:
Human Resources
Target Audience:
Applicants for the Aircraft Ejection Seat Overhaul Technician position
Year:
2007
Note:
Region / City
Topic:
Political party organization
Document type:
Internal rules and amendments
Organization / Institution:
LPVA (Libertarian Party of Virginia)
Target audience:
Members of LPVA, local committee members
Period of validity:
2 years
Date of approval:
April 21, 2007
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Tønsberg, Norway
Topic:
Certification, ExCB
Document Type:
Report
Organ / Institution:
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)
Author:
Chris Agius
Target Audience:
IECEx Management Committee Members
Effective Period:
Until 2025
Approval Date:
2024-12-18
Amendment Date:
2024-12-18
Year:
2003
Manufacturer:
Goodrich
Part Number:
23085-025
Document Type:
Maintenance Observation Report
Revision:
4
CMM Reference:
24-30-19
Date of Issue:
8/12/2003
Observed Issues:
Glyptol coating on stator and air-scoop, improper staking of Anti-Drive End Bearing Liner
Facility:
Repair station technician report
Scope:
Starter generator routine overhaul
Year:
2022
Region / city:
Glasgow, United Kingdom
Topic:
Gynaecological oncology, surgery
Document type:
Research article
Organization / institution:
Glasgow Royal Infirmary
Author:
Mr. Chia Yew Kong, Mr. Norman Galbraith, Mr. John Telfer, Prof Steven Lo, Mr. Neil Fairbairn, Mr. Michael Palmer, Mr. Seamus Teahan, Dr. Rhona Lindsay, Dr. Kevin Burton, Professor Campbell Roxburgh, Mr. Peter Chong, Mr. Colin Steele, Dr. Aiste McCormick, Miss Martha Quinn
Target audience:
Medical professionals, researchers in oncology
Period of action:
2018-2022
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Author:
Giuseppina Magri, Michael Barter, Jack Fletcher-Charles, Heungjae Choi, Daniel Slocombe, Emma Richards, Andrea Folli, Adrian Porch, Damien M. Murphy
Year:
2026
Region / City:
-
Theme:
Conductive Polymers, Organic Electronics
Document Type:
Research Article
Institution:
-
Author:
Teck Lip Dexter Tam, Ting Ting Lin, Mohamed I. Omer, Xizu Wang, Jianwei Xu
Target Audience:
Researchers, Academics, Industry Professionals in Materials Science and Organic Electronics
Period of Validity:
-
Approval Date:
-
Date of Changes:
-
Year:
2020
Region / city:
India
Theme:
Medical education, Health care
Document type:
Research article
Author:
Dr. Shankar Prasad Bhattacharya
Target audience:
Medical professionals, educators, policymakers
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Keywords:
Competency-based curriculum, Globalization, Medical Council of India, National Medical Commission, Privatization, Regulatory body
Case name:
R (on the application of the Director of Public Prosecutions) v Manchester Magistrates’ Court and Ruth Wood and Radical Haslam (Interested Parties)
Court:
High Court of England and Wales
Judges:
Lord Justice Popplewell; Mr Justice Fordham
Date of judgment:
21 November 2023
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Type of document:
Summary of judgment produced by counsel for the Interested Parties
Parties:
Director of Public Prosecutions; Manchester Magistrates’ Court; Ruth Wood; Radical Haslam
Legal basis:
Public Order Act 1986, s.4A; European Convention on Human Rights, Articles 10 and 11
Related proceedings:
Trial at Manchester Magistrates’ Court (15 November 2022); refusal to state a case (5 December 2022); judicial review proceedings (launched 27 February 2023)
Subject matter:
Freedom of expression and association; proportionality; burden and standard of proof; judicial review of acquittal and refusal to state a case
Outcome:
Claim for judicial review dismissed on all grounds
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Bladder cancer, radical radiotherapy, cystoscopy
Document Type:
Audit Template
Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Dr. Richard Walshaw, Dr. Tony Elliott
Target Audience:
Urologists, Radiotherapy professionals, Clinical Nurse Specialists
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
14 March 2020
Review Date:
22 May 2020
Year:
1792
Region / City:
Sheffield
Topic:
Radicalism, Local History, Print Culture
Document Type:
Chapter
Organization / Institution:
York St John University
Author:
Adam James Smith
Target Audience:
Scholars of Regional History, Radical Politics, Journalism
Period of Activity:
Late 18th century
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Modifications:
N/A
Year:
2005–2019
Region / City:
China, multicenter
Topic:
Cervical adenocarcinoma treatment outcomes
Document type:
Retrospective cohort study
Institution:
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University; Shanxi Cancer Hospital, Shanxi Medical University
Authors:
Zhaohong Yin, Lixin Sun, Zhenwei Gao, Hongwei Zhao, Chunlin Chen, Ping Liu
Target audience:
Oncology researchers and clinicians
Study period:
2005–2019
Ethics approval:
Ethics Committee of Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, NFEC-2017-135
Clinical trial registration:
CHiCTR1800017778, 14/08/2018
Treatment groups:
Radical hysterectomy (RH), Radiochemotherapy (R-CT)
Primary outcomes:
5-year overall survival (OS), 5-year disease-free survival (DFS)
Sample size:
236 patients (RH: 203, R-CT: 33)
Follow-up:
Available survival outcome data for all included patients
Data source:
Four C database of cervical cancer clinical records in mainland China
Inclusion criteria:
Age ≥18, biopsy-confirmed cervical adenocarcinoma, FIGO 2018 stage IIIC1, specific treatment regimens per group
Exclusion criteria:
Special cervical cancer types, non-compliance with inclusion criteria
Year:
2026
Region / City:
United States, Florida
Subject:
Mathematics
Document Type:
Lesson Plan / Curriculum Chapter
Organization:
BigIdeasMath.com
Author:
Laurie (Teaching Edition)
Target Audience:
High school students (Grades 9–12)
Standards:
Florida B.E.S.T. Standards for Mathematics MA.912.NSO.1.3, MA.912.NSO.1.5
Period:
Section 5.1–5.3
Duration:
1–3 days per section
Materials:
National Geographic Explorer Video, technology, whiteboards
Vocabulary:
nth root, rational exponent, radical function, cube root, simplest form of a radical, like radicals
Learning Objectives:
Understand and apply rational exponents and radical functions, simplify radical expressions, evaluate expressions and solve equations using radicals
Assessment:
Mini-assessment exercises, self-assessment exercises, Review & Refresh exercises
Year:
2026
Region / City:
International
Subject:
Philosophy, Ethics
Document Type:
Academic paper
Institution / Organization:
Independent research
Author:
Unspecified
Target Audience:
Scholars and students of philosophy
Date of Publication:
2026
Related Works:
Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Critique of Practical Reason, Critique of Judgment, Religion Within the Boundaries of Mere Reason
Keywords:
Kant, radical evil, reflective judgment, moral character, grace
Year:
2021
Artist:
Kojey Radical
Nationality:
British Ghanaian
Release Type:
Single
Album:
Debut album (upcoming 2022)
Producers:
KZ, Swindle, Ed Thomas, Jay Weathers
Genre:
Rap, spoken word, experimental
Distribution:
Atlantic Records
Platforms:
Streaming and download
Context:
Music release announcement
Year:
2026
Subject:
Mathematics
Topic:
Radical Functions, Square Roots, Cube Roots
Document type:
Educational worksheet
Author:
Unknown
Intended audience:
Students
Required prior knowledge:
Square roots, cube roots
Activities included:
Graphing functions, exploring domain and range, identifying endpoints and inflection points
Tools referenced:
Gizmo interactive simulations
Skills practiced:
Function graphing, analyzing transformations, interpreting mathematical properties
Contextual description:
Educational worksheet providing step-by-step exercises for exploring the properties, graphs, and transformations of square root and cube root functions using interactive simulations.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Federal procurement and contract management
Document Type:
Policy/Guidance
Agency / Institution:
GSA (General Services Administration)
Author:
GSA
Target Audience:
Contractors, Government Agencies
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Washington
Topic:
Road Safety, Litter Prevention
Document Type:
Public Awareness Campaign
Agency:
Washington State Department of Ecology, Washington State Department of Transportation
Author:
Washington State Agencies
Target Audience:
Drivers, Motorists, General Public
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified