№ files_lp_4_process_2_88788
File format: docx
Character count: 1590
File size: 40 KB
This is a dance choreography instruction for a song, detailing footwork and movements in a beginner-level line dance.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
UK
Topic:
Dance Choreography
Document Type:
Dance Instructions
Organization / Institution:
N/A
Author:
Steve Mason
Target Audience:
Beginner dancers
Effective Period:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Date:
March 7th, 2019
Occasion:
Memorial / Tribute
Subject:
Faith, Mourning, Comfort
Person Remembered:
Jonette Mercado Fernandez
Age:
17
Religious Texts Referenced:
2 Corinthians, Gospel of John
Author / Speaker:
Cristine (reader of scripture)
Location:
Not specified
Audience:
Friends, family, community of faith
Note:
Year
Theme:
Worship
Document Type:
Worship Resource
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Worship Service
Document Type:
Worship Service Bulletin
Organization:
Anglican Episcopal Church
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Churchgoers, Worshippers
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
1968
Region / City:
Michigan
Theme:
Military service, Veterans
Document Type:
Memorial
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Families, descendants
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Sanctity of Life
Document Type:
Religious Reflection
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Christian community, pro-life advocates
Date of Approval:
Not provided
Date of Changes:
Not provided
Year:
2023
Region / City:
N/A
Theme:
Christian Worship, Family, Church
Document Type:
Outline, Discussion Guide
Organization / Institution:
N/A
Author:
Bob Kauflin
Target Audience:
Church Leaders, Worship Leaders, Christian Families
Period of Action:
N/A
Date of Approval:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
1650s
Region / City:
America
Subject:
Love poetry
Document Type:
Poem
Author:
Anne Bradstreet
Intended Audience:
General public
Period of Validity:
Not applicable
Approval Date:
Not applicable
Date of Amendments:
Not applicable
Note:
Context description
WIC Loving Support Campaign: Guide for In-Depth Interviews with Breastfeeding Subject Matter Experts
Year:
2023
Region:
United States
Theme:
Breastfeeding promotion and support
Document type:
Research guide / Interview protocol
Organization:
USDA Food and Nutrition Service (FNS)
Author:
Hager Sharp
Target audience:
Breastfeeding subject matter experts working with WIC
Scope:
WIC participants from pregnancy to one year postpartum
Purpose:
Collect expert insights on WIC mothers’ breastfeeding knowledge, motivations, barriers, and effective supports
Method:
Structured in-depth interviews
Duration:
1 hour per interview
Topics covered:
Knowledge of breastfeeding, motivations and barriers, support resources, legal rights, skills, and lifestyle integration
Confidentiality:
Participant responses anonymized in reports provided to USDA
Document Type:
Funeral Service Program
Memorial Title:
In Loving Memory of Name Here
Name of Deceased:
Name Here
Date of Birth:
DOB
Date of Death:
DOD
Service Date and Time:
Service Date and Time
Service Location:
Service Location
Service Address:
Address Line 1; Address Line 2
Organizing Party:
The Family
Sections Included:
Poem/Scripture; Obituary; Acknowledgements; Order of Service; Musical Selections; Eulogy / Message; Final Viewing; Burial / Interment
Ceremony Elements:
Processional; Scripture Reading; Prayer; Musical Selection; Obituary Reading; Remarks; Eulogy; Recessional
Burial Information:
Burial / Interment
Language:
English
Purpose:
Memorial and funeral ceremony outline for the deceased
Year:
1500s–1960s
Region / Location:
Not specified
Document Type:
Memorial / Funeral Program
Author:
The Family
Intended Audience:
Friends and family of the deceased
Service Date:
Not specified
Service Location:
Address Line 1, Address Line 2
Content Sections:
Poem/Scripture, Acknowledgements, Obituary, Order of Service, Eulogy, Musical Selections, Prayer
Historical Context:
References the printing and typesetting industry from the 1500s to 1960s
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Australia
Choreographer:
Jasmin Currie
Dance Level:
Intermediate
Music:
Loving You Was Losing Me - Sons of Ashes
Type of Document:
Dance Routine
Target Audience:
Dancers, Dance Instructors
Date of Creation:
February 2026
Duration:
32 Counts
Wall:
2
Restart:
Yes, Wall 3, Wall 4, Wall 6
Tempo:
Intermediate
Description:
Step-by-step breakdown of a dance routine, including directions, turns, and timing.
Year:
Not specified
Region:
Not specified
Topic:
Christian teaching on love and righteousness
Document type:
Religious commentary / Expository text
Source / Institution:
Biblical text (New King James Version) with author commentary
Author:
Unspecified; includes commentary from John MacArthur, Holman Christian Standard Bible, Stanley Toussaint, Gloria Melville
Audience:
Christian readers, Bible study participants
Scripture references:
Matthew 5:46-48; Leviticus 19:2; Deuteronomy 18:13; Romans 5:8-10; Philippians 3:12-14
Themes:
Loving enemies, God-like character, kingdom ethics, moral perfection, inward righteousness
Purpose:
Explain the contrast between external legalistic righteousness and internal God-like character, emphasizing unconditional love
Expository text explaining the moral and spiritual teachings of Matthew 5:
46-48, emphasizing the call to God-like love and character beyond legalistic conformity to the law.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Spiritual growth, Church fellowship
Document type:
Religious meditation
Author:
N/A
Target audience:
Believers, Church members
Effective period:
February 6-12, 2023
Approval date:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Chernobyl, Former Soviet Union
Subject:
Military Technology, Environmental Modification, Nuclear Disaster
Document Type:
Documentary, Report
Institution:
Kla.TV
Author:
Werner Altnickel
Target Audience:
General Public, Scholars of History and Military Technology
Period of Action:
1986, 1997, 2002
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
New York
Topic:
International Relations, Israel, United Nations
Document Type:
Opinion Article
Author:
Daniel S. Mariaschin, David J. Michaels
Target Audience:
General Public
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Global
Theme:
Tanker Market, Shipping, Freight Rates
Document Type:
Report
Organization:
OPEC
Author:
Nikos Roussanoglou
Target Audience:
Shipping industry professionals, maritime economists
Period of validity:
January 2023
Approval Date:
18/02/2023
Date of Changes:
N/A
Author:
Prof. Dr. Hugo de Garis
Email:
[email protected]
Publication platform:
WordPress blog
Source URL:
https://profhugodegaris.wordpress.com
Document type:
Opinion essay
Thematic focus:
Masculism, gender politics, financial independence, divorce law
Ideological perspective:
Masculist
Key concepts:
FIP (Financially Independent Person), fluffie, man slavery, manosphere, MGTOW
Geographical references:
United States
Intended audience:
Readers interested in gender issues and men’s rights discourse