№ files_lp_3_process_7_017093
File format: docx
Character count: 1401
File size: 162 KB
This document is an examination for American Sign Language students, including various sections to assess different skills in receptive and expressive signing.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
N/A
Theme:
American Sign Language Assessment
Document Type:
Examination
Institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Students of American Sign Language
Validity Period:
N/A
Approval Date:
June 22, 2026
Modification Date:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2026
Region / city:
Canadian Ski Marathon
Theme:
Checkpoint operations, volunteer duties, and event coordination
Document type:
Manual
Organization / institution:
Canadian Ski Marathon
Author:
CSM Event Director, CSM Admin-2
Target audience:
Event leaders, checkpoint/task leaders, volunteers
Period of validity:
February 6-8, 2026
Approval date:
N/A
Modification date:
N/A
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Australia
Topic:
Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, PD-(L)1 inhibitors, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Document type:
Meeting minutes
Organization:
Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC)
Author:
Professor Andrew Wilson (PBAC Chair)
Target audience:
Stakeholders in the healthcare and pharmaceutical industry
Period of validity:
2019 and onwards
Date of approval:
February 2019
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Wuhan, China
Topic:
Immunology, Cancer Research, Gene Expression, Immunotherapy
Document Type:
Research Article
Institution:
Wuhan University of Science & Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Anhui Normal University
Authors:
Fei-Fei Hu, Chun-Jie Liu, Lan-Lan Liu, Qiong Zhang, An-Yuan Guo
Target Audience:
Researchers, Healthcare Professionals, Academics in Immunology and Oncology
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Last Revision:
N/A
Date:
June 24, 2025
Region / City:
Hemet, California, United States
Topic:
Road safety and impaired driving enforcement
Document Type:
Press release / public safety announcement
Organization:
Hemet Police Department
Prepared by:
Sergeant M. Chavez
Contact Person:
Sergeant Matt Chavez
Contact Phone:
(951) 765-2400
Contact Email:
[email protected]
Media Contact:
Public Information Social Media Officer Judith Gibson
Media Contact Email:
[email protected]
Event Date:
July 11, 2025
Event Time:
8:00 pm – 2:00 am
Event Type:
DUI and Driver’s License Checkpoint
Location:
Undisclosed location within the City of Hemet
Funding Source:
California Office of Traffic Safety grant through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Target Audience:
Drivers and residents of the City of Hemet
Subject Details:
Enforcement of laws related to driving under the influence of alcohol, drugs, prescription medication, and marijuana
Year:
2018
Region:
Australia
Subject:
PD-1 and PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies
Document Type:
Submission Template
Organization:
Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC)
Intended Audience:
Patients, healthcare providers, researchers, pharmaceutical industry, government bodies
Submission Deadline:
29 June 2018
Contact Information Required:
Yes
Confidentiality Note:
Commercial-in-confidence or personal information to be redacted before publication
Format:
Electronic submission in Microsoft Word or text-based format
Questions Covered:
Advantages, disadvantages, unmet clinical need, evidence requirements, cost-effectiveness, subsidy pricing, biomarker considerations, extrapolation across medicines and cancer types, rare cancers, follow-up actions, clinical trials, international models
Year:
2019–2024
Region:
International
Topic:
Oncology / Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Document Type:
Meta-analysis
Institution:
Multiple clinical research centers
Authors:
Various (from included RCTs)
Target Audience:
Medical researchers, oncologists, clinicians
Study Design:
Randomized controlled trials, Phase II and III
Interventions:
Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Sintilimab
Comparators:
Placebo, standard care, active surveillance
Outcomes Measured:
Overall survival (OS), Recurrence-free survival (RFS), adverse events (AEs)
Sample Size:
Data pooled from 10 studies
Statistical Methods:
DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model, hazard ratios (HRs), risk ratios (RRs)
Adverse Events Reported:
Fatigue, hypertension, elevated liver enzymes (grade 3+)
Publication Type:
Peer-reviewed articles
Description:
Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials assessing survival outcomes and safety of adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after curative treatment.
Year:
2021
Region / city:
Not specified
Topic:
Resource multiplexing between child and parent links of IAB node
Document type:
Contribution
Organization:
3GPP TSG RAN WG1
Author:
Moderator (AT&T)
Target audience:
3GPP members, stakeholders in telecommunications standards
Period of validity:
January 25th – February 5th, 2021
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
Not specified
Summary:
This document provides a summary of various proposals for improving resource multiplexing between the child and parent links of an IAB node, particularly focused on simultaneous operations, frequency domain multiplexing, and operational resource configurations.
Year:
2021
Organization:
3GPP TSG RAN WG1
Document type:
Technical contribution
Source:
Moderator (AT&T)
Title:
Summary of [104-e-NR-eIAB-01] – 1st Checkpoint
Agenda item:
8.10.1
Scope:
Enhancements to resource multiplexing between child and parent links of an IAB node
Contributors:
Huawei, Vivo, Intel, CEWiT, IITM, IITH, Tejas Networks, Reliance Jio
Target audience:
RAN working group members
Checkpoint dates:
Jan 27, Feb 5, Feb 13
Topics covered:
Simultaneous operation of access and backhaul links, dual-connectivity, TDD configurations, resource allocation strategies
Year:
2014
Software Version:
vCO 5.5.2, vRO HTTP REST Plugin 1.0.7
Region:
Global
Document Type:
Installation and Configuration Guide
Author:
VMware / CheckPoint
Target Audience:
System administrators, IT engineers
Required Environment:
vCenter 5.5.0, Windows client for vCO, CheckPoint Management Server
Procedures Included:
OVF deployment, password setup, network configuration, SSL certificate import, SSO authentication, plugin installation, workflow execution
Troubleshooting Notes:
Password issues, SSL key errors, time synchronization
Workflow Examples:
Add Host, Add Host to Group, Add Access Rule, Install Policy
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Virginia
Subject:
Interpreter Services, Sign Language, Government Agencies
Document Type:
Manual, Agreement
Organization:
Virginia Department for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing
Target Audience:
Qualified Sign Language Interpreters, State and Local Government Agencies
Effective Date:
January 1, 2020
Date of Approval:
January 1, 2020
Date of Last Update:
January 1, 2020
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Burlington
Subject:
Signage Regulations
Document Type:
Application Form
Authority / Institution:
Burlington City Government
Target Audience:
Property owners, contractors, and individuals applying for sign permits
Program name:
Ashland Sign & Façade Program
Document type:
Application form
Grant type:
Reimbursement grant
Administering organization:
Town of Ashland
Administering program:
Ashland Economic Development Incentive Program
Location:
Ashland, Massachusetts
Eligible applicants:
Businesses located in Ashland
Eligible improvements:
Exterior façade and sign improvements
Maximum funding amount:
Up to 50% of project cost or $5,000
Funding source:
Town funding
Approval authority:
Ashland Economic Development Advisory Group; Town Manager; Board of Selectmen
Submission requirements:
Completed application, bids, permits, supporting documents
Contact person:
Economic Development Director
Contact address:
101 Main Street, Ashland, MA 01721
Contact email:
[email protected]
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Indiana
Subject:
World Languages
Document Type:
Academic Standards
Institution:
Indiana Department of Education
Author:
Indiana Department of Education
Target Audience:
Teachers, School Administrators, Curriculum Planners
Period of Application:
Kindergarten to Grade 12
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Revisions:
2019
Year:
2016
Region / City:
London
Topic:
Traffic Sign Illumination Research
Document Type:
Invitation to Tender
Organization:
Transport for London (TfL)
Author:
Transport for London (TfL)
Target Audience:
Research firms, Tenderers
Period of Activity:
February 2016
Approval Date:
February 2016
Modification Date:
N/A
Note:
Year
Organization / institution:
Beykent University
Target audience:
Students of Beykent University
Description:
Guide for signing up for Zoom and joining an exam class for the ERASMUS+ SPEAKING EXAM at Beykent University.
Note:
Year
Note:
Year