№ files_lp_3_process_7_100317
File format: docx Character count: 29678 File size: 469 KB
Peer-reviewed clinical research article reporting a retrospective comparative evaluation of five phakic intraocular lens power calculation methods in a middle European cohort undergoing Visian ICL implantation.
Year: 2023
Journal: Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001055
Authors: Jascha A. Wendelstein; Sarah Hinterberger; Peter C. Hoffmann; Nino Hirnschall; Michael J. Koss; Achim Langenbucher; Paul Jirak; Matthias Bolz
Institutions: Johannes Kepler University Linz; Kepler University Hospital GmbH; Saarland University; IROC Zürich; Augen- und Laserklinik Castrop-Rauxel; Augenzentrum Nymphenburger Höfe München; EyeLaser Clinic Linz
Region: Linz, Austria
Study Period: 2014–2020
Submission Date: November 22, 2021
Acceptance Date: August 30, 2022
Study Design: Single-center, single-surgeon retrospective consecutive case series
Sample Size: 91 eyes of 91 patients
Population: Middle European patients undergoing myopic phakic intraocular lens implantation
Intervention: Visian Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) model V4c implantation
Comparative Methods: OCOS software; JPhakic software; Olsen-Feingold formula; Holladay formula; Linz-Homburg-Castrop formula
Outcome Measures: Mean and median absolute prediction error; percentage of eyes within 0.25 D, 0.5 D, 0.75 D, and 1.0 D
Ethics Approval: EK 1074/2021, JKU ethics committee Linz
Publisher: Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS
Copyright Year: 2022
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.

Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?

You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:
  1. Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
  2. In the app, tap Send.
  3. Select network, paste our wallet address.
  4. Send the exact amount shown above.
After sending, paste your TXID (transaction ID) and your email to receive the download link. Need help? Contact support and we’ll guide you step by step.

The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Intraocular Triamcinolone Acetonide (KenalogTM or TriesenceTM)
Year: 2020
Region / city: USA
Theme: Ophthalmology, Medical Risk Management
Document type: Risk Management Recommendations
Organization: OMIC
Author: Anne M. Menke, RN, PhD
Target audience: Ophthalmologists
Effective period: Ongoing
Approval date: 8/4/20
Date of changes: None specified
Supplemental Materials: Whole Exome Sequencing, Intraocular Pressure Analysis, and Sample and Variant Quality Control Methods
Section: Supplemental Materials
Abbreviations: IOP; MEE/RHC; QC; GSA; PCA; LD; MAF; PC; WES; BAM; VCF; EUR; AFR; AMR; EAS; SAS; GQ; SNPs; MAD; GTEx; Non-PAR; Indels; HWE; AB; GWAS; FAME; GC; QTL; eQTL; CLPP; FDR; OHTN; RINT
Methodology: Whole exome sequencing and statistical genetic analysis
Sequencing Platform: NovaSeq S4 flow cell (2x151bp)
Library Preparation Kit: KAPA Hyper Prep with Library Amplification Primer Mix (KK8504)
Capture Kit: IDT XGen hybridization and wash kit
Custom Bait: TWIST Biosciences exome bait
Liquid Handling Systems: Agilent Bravo; Hamilton Starlet
Quantification Method: qPCR; Invitrogen Quant-It broad range dsDNA assay
Genotyping Platform: Global Screening Array (GSA)
Software: PLINK 1.9; PLINK 2.0; R; Python; Hail v0.2
Reference Panel: 1000 Genomes Project Phase 3
Ancestry Groups: European (EUR); African (AFR); Admixed American (AMR); East Asian (EAS); South Asian (SAS)
Statistical Analysis: Analysis of variance (aov in R); Tukey honest significant difference test
Quality Control Criteria: Sample-level and variant-level QC including genotype missingness, heterozygosity, relatedness (PI_HAT), sex concordance, ancestry inference, BAM and VCF metrics
Predictive Power of Polygenic Risk Scores for Intraocular Pressure or Vertical Cup to Disc Ratio
Year: 2023
Region / city: Australia
Field: Ophthalmology, Genetics
Document type: Research Article
Institution: QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, University of Queensland, The University of Western Australia, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Queensland University of Technology, University of Tasmania, University of Melbourne
Author: Weixiong He, Samantha Sze-Yee Lee, Santiago Diaz Torres, Xikun Han, Puya Gharahkhani, Michael Hunter, Chandrakumar Balartnasingam, Jamie Craig, Alex W Hewitt, David A Mackey, Stuart MacGregor
Target Audience: Researchers, Healthcare professionals
Period: 2023
Date approved: N/A
Date of changes: N/A
Corneal hysteresis determination and its clinical implications for intraocular pressure measurement
Year: 2018
Region / City: Depew, NY
Topic: Corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, glaucoma
Document Type: Guideline Note
Organization / Institution: VbBS, HERC
Author: Not specified
Target Audience: Ophthalmologists, healthcare professionals
Effective Period: Not specified
Approval Date: November 2014
Modification Date: Not specified
Responses to Vision and Spectacle Use Questionnaires for Different Intraocular Lenses
Year: 2026
Study Type: Clinical survey
Region / City: Not specified
Topic: Ophthalmology, intraocular lenses
Document Type: Supplementary tables
Institution: Not specified
Authors: Not specified
Target Population: Patients with intraocular lenses
Questionnaires Included: NAVQ, CATQUEST-9SF, Dysphotopsia, Spectacle dependence
Number of IOL types surveyed: 4
Data Presentation: Number of responses per question
Supplementary Information: Comparison of Multifocal Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Asian Patients
Year: 2026
Region: Asia
Subject: Ophthalmology, Intraocular Lens Calculation
Document Type: Supplementary Material
Institution: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Research Center
Authors: Jinchul Kim, Joonsung Park, Yoonjung Jo
Sample Size: Short eyes N=134, Medium eyes N=2833, Long eyes N=133
Formulas Evaluated: PEARL, PEARL-rCMAL, HTCL, Kane, EVO 2.0, HTAL, HSAL, HSCL, Barrett, Hoffer QST, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, SRK/T
Metrics Reported: ME, SD, RMSE, MedAE, MAE, Percentage within 0.50 D
Optimized Constants: Provided for all formulas including Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK/T, Haigis variants, PEARL, Kane, EVO 2.0, Barrett
Data Analysis Methods: Root mean square error comparisons, heteroscedastic test, Holm correction, Cochran’s Q test, pairwise McNemar test
Axial Length Categories: Short (<22 mm), Medium (22–26 mm), Long (>26 mm)
Topics: Phakic Linz-Homburg-Castrop Intraocular