№ lp_2_3_24194
File format: docx
Character count: 13574
File size: 45 KB
This document outlines a feasibility study for the transformation of Egyptian SMEs through carbon markets, focusing on the development of a voluntary carbon market and financial instruments to support decarbonization efforts in targeted sectors.
Note:
Year
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Egypt
Subject:
Electric Road Vehicles, Lithium-Ion Batteries
Document Type:
Notification Addendum
Organization:
Egyptian Organization for Standardization and Quality
Author:
Delegation of Egypt
Target Audience:
Producers and importers of electric road vehicles and batteries
Adoption Date:
18 December 2023
Date of Entry into Force:
5 January 2024
Date of Notification:
29 January 2024
Period for Comments:
Not applicable
Date of Publication:
Not applicable
Date of Withdrawal:
Not applicable
Subject:
Ancient Egyptian writing system
Topic:
Hieroglyphs and their functions
Document Type:
Reading comprehension worksheet
Educational Level:
School students
Activity Type:
Reading questions and paragraph writing
Number of Questions:
17
Writing Task:
Explanatory paragraph
Focus Skills:
History skills; reading comprehension; written explanation
Key Concepts:
hieroglyphs; symbols; sounds; cartouche; Rosetta Stone; writing systems
Related Civilization:
Ancient Egypt
Year:
2020–2026
Country:
Egypt
City:
Cairo
Subject:
Human rights; arbitrary detention; fair trial violations
Document type:
Urgent action / advocacy alert
Institution:
Supreme State Security Prosecution; Cairo Criminal Court
Person:
Marwa Arafa
Occupation:
Human rights activist, translator
Age:
33
Detention start date:
20 April 2020
Trial start date:
6 July 2025
Next hearing:
15 February 2026
Health condition:
Pulmonary embolism, anaemia, heart condition
Prison locations:
Al-Qanater Women’s Prison, 10th of Ramadan Prison
Legal representation:
Denied access to case files and restricted contact with lawyer
Children:
One daughter diagnosed on the autism spectrum
Family impact:
Separation from child, trauma to family
International attention:
Amnesty International, Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights
Year:
3
Subject:
Ancient Egypt
Document Type:
Educational Plan
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Mrs Bailey and Mrs Benyon
Target Audience:
Students of Year 3
Period:
Ongoing school term
Date Approved:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Date
Author:
Howard Carter
Event:
Tomb discovery
Location:
Egypt
Audience:
Archaeologists, Historians
Importance:
Historical significance of the find
Type:
Personal diary
Note:
Year
Topic:
Ancient Egyptian Religion
Document Type:
Rubric
Target Audience:
Students
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Egypt, Cairo
Subject:
Terracotta building products
Document Type:
Ministerial Decree / Technical Standard Notification
Issuing Authority:
Egyptian Organization for Standardization and Quality
Author:
Ministry of Industry and Trade
Target Audience:
Producers and importers of clay liner plates
Transitional Period:
Six months from notification
Adoption Date:
18 December 2023
Entry into Force:
5 January 2024
Reference Documents:
ASTM C479-2017(2022)
Note:
Year
Theme:
Ancient Egyptian culture
Document type:
Educational material
Target audience:
Students, educators
Context description:
Collection of creative activities and educational tasks related to Ancient Egyptian culture, aimed at engaging students with hands-on projects and research.
Year:
1341-1323 BCE
Region / City:
Ancient Egypt
Topic:
Egyptian History, Archaeology
Document Type:
Article
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
General Public, Students, Historians
Period of Activity:
1332-1323 BCE
Approval Date:
1922
Date of Changes:
Not Applicable
Year:
2024
Country:
Egypt
Subject:
Motor vehicle tyres regulation
Document type:
Notification Addendum
Authority:
Egyptian Organization for Standardization and Quality
Reference:
Ministerial Decree No.142/2024
Previous standard:
Ministerial Decree No.32/2010
Related international regulation:
UN/ECE Regulation No.30
Adoption date:
22 April 2024
Entry into force date:
22 May 2024
Comments contact:
National Enquiry Point, Egyptian Organization for Standardization and Quality
Products covered:
Road vehicle tyres (ICS 83.160.10)
Period of transitional compliance:
Six months from entry into force
Year:
2024
Region / Country:
Egypt
Topic:
Air Conditioning and Heat Pump Standards
Document Type:
Notification Addendum
Authority:
Egyptian Organization for Standardization and Quality
Author:
Ministry of Trade and Industry
Target Audience:
Producers and importers of HVAC equipment
Date of Adoption:
7 September 2024
Date of Entry into Force:
3 October 2024
Relevant ICS Codes:
23.120 (Ventilators, Fans, Air-conditioners), 27.080 (Heat pumps)
Referenced Standards:
ISO 15042:2017/AMD 1:2020
Comment Handling Agency:
National Enquiry Point, Egyptian Organization for Standardization and Quality
Contact:
[email protected], [email protected]
Website:
http://www.eos.org.eg
Year:
1240 BCE
Region:
Ancient Egypt
Theme:
Religious hymn, Funerary text
Document type:
Hymn
Source:
Egyptian Book of the Dead, Papyrus of Ani
Author:
Unknown
Audience:
Practitioners of ancient Egyptian religion
Translation:
E. Budge
Accessed:
University of Pennsylvania, 30 July 2015
Content:
Invocation and praise of the god Osiris, describing his dominion, attributes, and interactions with other deities and the natural world
Year of Birth:
1931
Year of Death:
2021
Place of Birth:
Nile Delta, Egypt
Place of Death:
Cairo, Egypt
Nationality:
Egyptian
Occupation:
Psychiatrist, Writer, Feminist Activist
Education:
Cairo University, Columbia University
Notable Works:
Women and Sex (1972)
Field:
Feminism, Psychiatry, Literature
Target Audience:
General public, Academics, Activists
Positions Held:
Director of Public Health, Egypt
Year:
2024
Location:
Vichy, France
Event Type:
Horse show and championship
Organizers:
A.C.A Association, French Arabian Horse
Disciplines:
Half-Blood horse, Purebred Arabian horse, Ridden Classes (Classic Pleasure, Western Pleasure, Hunter Pleasure)
Judges:
International panel from Austria, UAE, Morocco, France, Kuwait, Spain, Iraq, Italy, Belgium, Poland
Registration Period:
June 18 – July 11, 2024
Payment Deadline:
July 15, 2024
Show Dates:
August 7 – August 12, 2024
Venue:
Stade du Sichon, 106 Rue Jean Jaurès, 03200 Vichy
Contact Email:
[email protected]
Bank Details:
Société Générale, IBAN FR76 3000 3000 5900 0501 4158 081, BIC SOGEFRPP
Classes:
Yearling Fillies, Fillies 2-3 years, Mares 4-6 & 7+, Yearling Colts, Colts 2-3 years, Geldings, Stallions 4-6 & 7+
Awards:
Gold, Silver, Bronze medals, Best In Show, Special Awards
Judging Criteria:
Type, head & neck, body, legs, movement; scoring 1-20 points per criterion
Veterinary Requirements:
Certificates required for overbite/underbite, cryptorchidism
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Serbia
Topic:
Sustainable Development, SMEs, Green Transition, EU Funding
Document Type:
Press Release
Organization / Institution:
European Investment Bank (EIB), Banca Intesa, Intesa Leasing
Author:
European Investment Bank
Target Audience:
Businesses, SMEs, Financial Institutions
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
28 November 2024
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Katowice
Topic:
Business, Economy
Document Type:
Press Release
Organization:
Pracodawcy RP, Regional Chamber of Commerce in Katowice
Author:
Magdalena Jarocka
Target Audience:
Entrepreneurs, Policymakers, Media
Date of approval:
October 27, 2025
Date of changes:
N/A
Contextual description:
Press release announcing a collaboration between large enterprises and SMEs at the European Congress of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises to strengthen the Polish economy through synergy.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2018
Region / city:
Middle East and North Africa
Theme:
E-commerce, Institutional Reform, Export Development
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
The World Bank
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Not specified
Period of validity:
2015-2018
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Building Information Modelling (BIM), Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), Construction Industry
Document Type:
Research Paper
Organization / Institution:
London South Bank University
Author:
Rafiu Dimeji Seidu, James I. P. Rundle, Job Momoh, Obas J. Ebohon, Bert Ediale Young, Zulfikar Adamu
Target Audience:
Academic Researchers, Construction Industry Professionals
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Business, Entrepreneurship, Market Research, Business Finance, Marketing
Document Type:
Educational Content
Organ / Institution:
Educational Institutions, Business Training Providers
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students, Entrepreneurs, Business Professionals
Period of Validity:
Indefinite
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Context:
The document provides a detailed breakdown of business concepts aimed at educating learners about enterprise, market research, business structures, and finance, particularly in the context of the UK economy.