№ lp_1_2_36131
File format: docx
Character count: 29121
File size: 111 KB
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Business, Entrepreneurship, Market Research, Business Finance, Marketing
Document Type:
Educational Content
Organ / Institution:
Educational Institutions, Business Training Providers
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students, Entrepreneurs, Business Professionals
Period of Validity:
Indefinite
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Context:
The document provides a detailed breakdown of business concepts aimed at educating learners about enterprise, market research, business structures, and finance, particularly in the context of the UK economy.
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Note:
Year
Theme:
Immigration and Visa Policy
Document Type:
Handbook
Institution:
Bournemouth University
Author:
Bournemouth University
Target Audience:
Students holding a UK student visa
Year:
2015
Region / City:
Los Gatos, CA
Topic:
PAN ID Compression
Document Type:
Technical Specification
Organization / Institution:
IEEE
Author:
Benjamin Rolfe
Target Audience:
IEEE P802.15 working group
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
15 Sept 2015
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2015
Region / city:
Los Gatos, CA
Topic:
PAN ID Compression in IEEE 802.15.4 standard
Document type:
Technical submission
Organization / institution:
IEEE P802.15
Author:
Benjamin Rolfe
Target audience:
IEEE 802.15 Working Group members
Period of validity:
Indefinite
Approval date:
14 July 2015
Date of changes:
Not specified
Organization:
IEEE P802.15 Wireless Personal Area Networks
Project:
IEEE P802.15
Document type:
Technical contribution
Standard:
IEEE 802.15.4 / 802.15.4e
Submission date:
14 July 2015
Author:
Benjamin Rolfe
Affiliation:
BCA
Committee:
Maintenance Standing Committee
Related work:
802.15.4 Revision Preparation
Subject:
PAN ID Compression rules and frame addressing
Release status:
IEEE contribution, publicly available
Source type:
Standards working group submission
Note:
Year
Topic:
Feeding relationships in ecosystems
Document Type:
Educational material
Target Audience:
Students, educators
Description:
Educational source explaining the structure and dynamics of food chains and webs in ecosystems, with an example of the impact of cane toads in the Kimberley region of Western Australia.
Year:
2024
Region / City:
New Zealand
Topic:
Chemistry
Document Type:
Exam questions
Author:
NZQA
Target Audience:
Students preparing for NCEA exams
Period of validity:
2024
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2020
Module Dates:
July 11–17, 2022
Institution:
Ohio University
Program:
Online Professional English Network (OPEN)
Sponsor:
U.S. Department of State
Administrator:
FHI 360
Funding:
U.S. Government
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Subject:
Tourism services and itineraries
Module Number:
3
Document Type:
Online course module downloadable packet
Language:
English
Platform:
Canvas (Pre-assessment delivery)
Estimated Completion Time:
3–5 hours
Parts:
Vocabulary and Listening; Listening and Speaking; Reading and Writing
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Nozzle failure analysis and redesign
Document Type:
Technical report
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Engineers and technical specialists
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Subject:
History
Document Type:
Curriculum Outline
Institution:
OCR History
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students, Educators
Period of Action:
1629-1660
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Last Update:
Not specified
Contextual Description:
Detailed curriculum mapping for Year 11 History, covering studies of Kenilworth Castle and Personal Rule to Restoration Britain.
Year:
2023
Region / Country:
Rwanda
Topic:
Social protection and livelihood trajectories
Document type:
Research paper
Institution / Organization:
Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex; University of Cambridge
Authors:
Rachel Sabates-Wheeler, Ricardo Sabates, Stephen Devereux
Funder:
Concern Worldwide
Keywords:
social protection, heterogeneity, livelihoods, graduation, poverty
Target population:
Programme participants in Rwanda
Data source:
Panel survey from NGO-implemented graduation programme
Period covered:
During and post-programme implementation
Key findings:
Household characteristics, location, shock type, and resource complementarities influence livelihood trajectories
Author:
Ahmed Imad Jawad Alradhi
Affiliation:
University of Basrah, College of Administration and Economics
Country:
Iraq
Emails:
[email protected]
Document Type:
Academic research article
Field:
Corporate Governance and Behavioral Finance
Main Topics:
Halo effect, corporate governance, strategic system criteria, financial performance
Keywords:
organizational culture, accounting, management accounting
Organizations Mentioned:
University of Basrah
Research Focus:
Influence of halo effect on management system criteria in listed companies
Theoretical Frameworks:
Agency theory, stakeholder theory
Economic Context:
Capital market and stock companies
Discipline Context:
Management, accounting, and corporate governance studies
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Serbia
Topic:
Sustainable Development, SMEs, Green Transition, EU Funding
Document Type:
Press Release
Organization / Institution:
European Investment Bank (EIB), Banca Intesa, Intesa Leasing
Author:
European Investment Bank
Target Audience:
Businesses, SMEs, Financial Institutions
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
28 November 2024
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Katowice
Topic:
Business, Economy
Document Type:
Press Release
Organization:
Pracodawcy RP, Regional Chamber of Commerce in Katowice
Author:
Magdalena Jarocka
Target Audience:
Entrepreneurs, Policymakers, Media
Date of approval:
October 27, 2025
Date of changes:
N/A
Contextual description:
Press release announcing a collaboration between large enterprises and SMEs at the European Congress of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises to strengthen the Polish economy through synergy.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2018
Region / city:
Middle East and North Africa
Theme:
E-commerce, Institutional Reform, Export Development
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
The World Bank
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Not specified
Period of validity:
2015-2018
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Building Information Modelling (BIM), Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), Construction Industry
Document Type:
Research Paper
Organization / Institution:
London South Bank University
Author:
Rafiu Dimeji Seidu, James I. P. Rundle, Job Momoh, Obas J. Ebohon, Bert Ediale Young, Zulfikar Adamu
Target Audience:
Academic Researchers, Construction Industry Professionals
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Document Type:
Chapter
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Singapore
Theme:
Talent development, SME support
Document type:
FAQ
Organization:
Enterprise Singapore
Target audience:
SMEs in Singapore
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of updates:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
UK
Topic:
Supply Chain Risk Management in Construction
Document Type:
Research Paper
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Researchers, SMEs in the construction industry
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified