№ files_lp_3_process_9_12283
File format: docx
Character count: 15519
File size: 716 KB
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Mississippi, USA; Torino, Italy; Okayama, Japan; Paris, France
Subject:
Taxonomy proposal
Document type:
Proposal
Organization / institution:
ICTV (International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses)
Author:
Sead Sabanadzovic, Nina Aboughanem-Sabanadzovic, Massimo Turina, Nobuhiro Suzuki, Mart Krupovic
Target audience:
Virologists, researchers in plant and fungal virology
Effective period:
2025
Approval date:
2025-06-20
Revision date:
N/A
Submission date:
20/06/2025
Taxonomic changes proposed:
New family, genus, and species classification
Abstract:
Proposal for the establishment of a new virus family, Tobaliviridae, with a single genus, Tobalivirus, and nine species, to classify a growing group of “tobamo-like” mycoviruses.
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2025
Region / city:
International
Topic:
Taxonomy, Virology
Document type:
Proposal
Organ / institution:
International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV)
Author:
Caixia Yang, Avijit Roy, Juliana Freitas-Astúa, Antonio Tiberini, Li Jun-Min, Kavi Sidharthan, Mónica Madariaga-Villarroel, Sergey Y. Morozov, Pedro L. Ramos-González
Target audience:
Virologists, Taxonomists
Period of validity:
2025-2026
Approval date:
03/06/2025
Revision date:
20/08/2025
Year:
2018
Region / City:
Gorgan, Iran
Subject:
Taxonomy of viruses
Document type:
Taxonomic proposal
Organization / Institution:
ICTV
Authors:
Mahsa Yazdi, Majid Bouzari, Ezzat Allah Ghaemi, Evelien Adriaenssens, Andrew Kropinski
Target audience:
ICTV Subcommittees
Date of approval:
June 2018
Date of revision:
N/A
Contextual description:
Taxonomic proposal for the creation of a new species, Escherichia virus Golestan, within the Kagunavirus genus, based on genomic analysis of related phages.
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Bristol, UK; Oldenburg, Germany; Guelph, Canada
Field:
Virus Taxonomy
Document type:
Taxonomic Proposal
Institution:
University of the West of England, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Quadram Institute Bioscience, University of Guelph
Authors:
Turner D, Moraru C, Adriaenssens EM, Kropinski AM
Target audience:
ICTV Study Group members
Approval Date:
May 2022
Revision Date:
September 2022
Taxonomic name:
Aryavirus, Iiscvirinae
Date of first submission:
May 2022
Date of revision:
September 2022
Corresponding author:
Andrew M. Kropinski
Supporting evidence:
New genus Aryavirus, subfamily Iiscvirinae creation
Origin of taxon name:
Indian Institute of Science
Description:
This taxonomic proposal presents the creation of a new subfamily Iiscvirinae, including the genera Jilinvirus and Aryavirus, based on genomic and phylogenetic analysis.
Year:
2024
Region / city:
N/A
Subject:
Viroids, Pospiviroid species
Document type:
Draft annex to ISPM 27
Organization:
International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC)
Author:
Christophe Lacomme, Johanna Roenhorst, Carla Oplaat, Rosemarie Hammond
Target audience:
Experts, phytosanitary professionals
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
2024-01-26
Amendment date:
N/A
Contextual description:
Draft diagnostic protocol for Pospiviroid species as part of the ISPM 27 standard, focusing on viroids and their detection methods.
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Northern Territory, Australia
Topic:
Taxonomy proposal, virology
Document Type:
Taxonomic Proposal
Organization / Institution:
ICTV (International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses)
Author:
Peter J. Walker, Kim R. Blasdell, Ralf G. Dietzgen, Juliana Freitas-Astúa, Hideki Kondo, Gael Kurath, Ivan V. Kuzmin, David M. Stone, Robert B. Tesh, Noel Tordo, Nikos Vasilakis, Anna E. Whitfield
Target Audience:
Virologists, taxonomists, ICTV study groups
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Contextual Description:
A taxonomic proposal document outlining the creation of a new species within the genus Hapavirus, based on sequence divergence and genomic characteristics of Holmes Jungle virus (HOJV).
Code assigned:
2023.022M
Short title:
Create thirty-two new species in the genus Varicosavirus, subfamily Betarhabdovirinae (Mononegavirales: Rhabdoviridae)
Author(s):
Bejerman N; Debat H; Dietzgen RG; Kondo H; Ramos-González P; Whitfield AE; Walker PJ; Freitas-Astúa J
Corresponding author:
Bejerman N
Email addresses:
[email protected]
ICTV Study Group:
ICTV Rhabdoviridae Study Group
Study Group votes:
10 members; 4 votes support; 0 votes against; 0 no vote
Taxon derived from living person:
No
Date first submitted to SC Chair:
June 23, 2023
Proposal type:
Taxonomic proposal
Virus family:
Rhabdoviridae
Subfamily:
Betarhabdovirinae
Order:
Mononegavirales
Genus:
Varicosavirus
Number of proposed species:
32
Scope:
Plant-infecting rhabdoviruses
Genome characteristics:
Bi-segmented RNA genomes with coding-complete sequences
Year:
2025
Region / city:
International
Topic:
Taxonomy, Virology
Document type:
Proposal
Organ / institution:
International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV)
Author:
Caixia Yang, Avijit Roy, Juliana Freitas-Astúa, Antonio Tiberini, Li Jun-Min, Kavi Sidharthan, Mónica Madariaga-Villarroel, Sergey Y. Morozov, Pedro L. Ramos-González
Target audience:
Virologists, Taxonomists
Period of validity:
2025-2026
Approval date:
03/06/2025
Revision date:
20/08/2025
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Hubei Province, China
Topic:
Virus taxonomy, Ephemerovirus genus, new species proposal
Document type:
Taxonomic proposal
Organization / institution:
International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV)
Authors:
Walker PJ, Freitas-Astúa J, Bejerman N, Blasdell K, Dietzgen RG, Fooks A, Kondo H, Ramos-González PL, Shi M, Tesh RB, Tordo N, Vasilakis N, Whitfield AE
Target audience:
Virologists, taxonomists, researchers in infectious diseases
Period of validity:
Indefinite
Approval date:
June 23, 2023
Date of revisions:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Proposer response to ICTV comments:
Minor typos corrected
Corresponding author:
Walker PJ
Summary:
The document proposes a new species, Ephemerovirus huanggang, based on the detection of Huanggang rhabd tick virus 2 from cattle ticks in China, outlining its genomic features and phylogenetic analysis.
Year:
2018
Region / City:
Guelph, Liverpool
Subject:
Taxonomy
Document Type:
Taxonomic Proposal
Organization:
ICTV
Author:
Andrew M. Kropinski, Evelien Adriaenssens
Target Audience:
ICTV Subcommittee Members, Researchers in Viral Taxonomy
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
March 2018
Date of Revision:
N/A
Kingdom:
Plantae
Division:
Hepaticophyta
Class:
Hepaticopsida
Order:
Marchantiales
Family:
Marchantiaceae
Genus:
Marchantia
Biological group:
Bryophytes
Document type:
Botanical descriptive text
Main subject:
Morphology, anatomy and reproduction of Marchantia
Secondary subjects:
Distribution, habitat and taxonomy of Marchantia species
Number of species in genus:
About 65
Common habitat:
Moist and shady terrestrial environments
Geographical distribution:
Cosmopolitan
Regions mentioned:
India, Himalayan region, Haryana, Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, South India
Altitude range mentioned:
4000–8000 feet in the Himalayas
Common species mentioned:
Marchantia polymorpha, Marchantia berteroana, Marchantia palmata, Marchantia nepalensis, Marchantia simlana
Reproduction types:
Asexual and sexual
Life cycle type:
Haplodiplontic
Dominant phase:
Haploid gametophyte
Reproductive structures:
Gemma cups, antheridiophores, archegoniophores
Plant body type:
Thalloid gametophyte
Typical thallus length:
2–10 cm
Key anatomical zones:
Photosynthetic zone and storage zone
Structures on ventral surface:
Scales and rhizoids
Rhizoid types:
Smooth-walled and tuberculate
Researchers cited:
Richard (1958), Chopra (1943), Udar (1970)
Year:
2026
Region / City:
China (Lanzhou, Chengdu, Edinburgh)
Theme:
Genomics, Evolutionary Biology
Document Type:
Research Article
Organization / Institution:
Lanzhou University, Sichuan University, University of Edinburgh, Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh
Author:
Shuo Feng, Dafu Ru, Yongshuai Sun, Kangshan Mao, Richard Milne, Jianquan Liu
Target Audience:
Researchers in evolutionary biology, genomics, and plant sciences
Period of Effect:
Not applicable
Approval Date:
Not mentioned
Date of Last Changes:
Not mentioned
Year:
2026
Region / City:
San Antonio, Texas
Theme:
Retinoblastoma, Fundraising, Medical Conferences
Document Type:
Crowdfunding Page Template
Organization:
WE C Hope USA
Author:
Marissa Gonzalez, Abby White
Target Audience:
Parents, Survivors, Medical Professionals, Supporters
Period of Action:
September 2026
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Document type:
Guidance document
Subject area:
Clinical research compliance
Topic:
Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA)
Applicable field:
Clinical trials
Responsible parties:
Sponsor, monitor, site personnel, principal investigator
Regulatory body referenced:
Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Key components:
Root cause analysis, corrective action, preventive action, follow-up evaluation
Authorship requirements:
Responsible individual or organization
Approval requirements:
Author signature, IRB review
Record retention:
Site regulatory file
Intended use:
Documentation of discrepancies and corrective measures in clinical research
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Middlesex University
Topic:
Research Ethics, Online Survey Tools
Document Type:
Guide
Institution:
Middlesex University
Author:
Middlesex University
Target Audience:
Staff and Students
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
August 2024
Date of Revisions:
August 2024
Year:
2025
Note:
Region / City
Theme:
Business Software / Presentation Software
Document Type:
Lesson Plan
Author:
Glenda Liddell-White
Target Audience:
Students
Period of Validity:
April 14 – 18, 2025
Contextual Description:
A lesson plan for teaching students how to create and manage professional presentations using Microsoft PowerPoint.
Year:
2024
Region / city:
United States
Topic:
Engineering Awards
Document Type:
Guide
Organization / Institution:
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Author:
Jane Moran Alspach
Target Audience:
Members of the American Society of Civil Engineers, potential nominators
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
-
Theme:
Production Resources/Tools Master Data Creation
Document Type:
Master Data Script
Organization / Institution:
SAP
Author:
-
Target Audience:
SAP system users, Production Engineers, Data Specialists, Maintenance Planners
Validity Period:
-
Approval Date:
-
Modification Date:
-
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Michigan
Topic:
Bleach Dilution for Disinfection
Document Type:
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)
Institution:
Michigan State University, Center for Research on Ingredient Safety
Author:
Anderson, E., and J. Li
Target Audience:
Laboratory Personnel
Effective Date:
5-14-2020
Revision Date:
5-14-2020