№ lp_1_2_44145
File format: docx
Character count: 86555
File size: 1227 KB
The document is a Program Administration Manual (PAM) for the International Research and Studies (IRS) program, providing guidelines for grant management, responsibilities, and compliance with U.S. Department of Education regulations.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Washington, DC
Topic:
Grant administration, international education
Document Type:
Program Administration Manual
Institution:
U.S. Department of Education
Author:
IFLE (International and Foreign Language Education)
Target Audience:
Grant administrators, program officers, grantees
Period of Effect:
FY 2023-2025
Approval Date:
October 2023
Date of Changes:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2023
Organization:
MFO Crystal
Industry:
Finance
Products/Services:
Various types of loans
Document type:
Request for Proposal (RFP)
Target audience:
Vendors providing IT security and PAM solutions
Scope:
Company-wide deployment including all departments and satellite offices
Key requirements:
Privileged access management, role-based access control, MFA, integration with Active Directory, session monitoring, audit and reporting capabilities
Schedule:
Issuance 02.08.2023, RFP closes 18.08.2023, Initial Evaluation 05.09.2023, Final Notification 06.10.2023
Deployment environment:
Onsite data center and Azure cloud
Contact persons:
Nino Pirmisashvili, Irakli Gagoshidze
Proposal submission platform:
www.etenders.ge
Evaluation criteria:
Technical compatibility, product capabilities, implementation ease, price, vendor experience
Request for Bid:
P22-O03-O22 Welcome Center Pylon Non-Illuminated Signs for Production and Installation
Year:
2021
Region / City:
United States, Milwaukee
Theme:
Signage, Construction
Document Type:
Request for Bid (RFB)
Agency / Institution:
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Author:
Pam Loignon
Target Audience:
Contractors, Vendors, Suppliers
Validity Period:
From September 13, 2021, until contract completion
Approval Date:
August 20, 2021
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Massachusetts
Topic:
Health Equity, Hospital Quality
Document type:
Manual
Organization:
MassHealth
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Hospitals, Healthcare Providers
Period of validity:
PY3-5
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of modifications:
5/19/25, 12/8/25, 2/4/26
Year:
2023-2025
Region / city:
Queensland
Topic:
Disability Services, Inclusion, Government Strategy
Document Type:
Disability Service Plan
Organization:
Department of Seniors, Disability Services and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Partnerships
Author:
Dr. Chris Sarra, Director-General
Target Audience:
Queensland Government, Disability Services Stakeholders, Public
Period of Action:
2023-2025
Date of Approval:
December 2021
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Year:
2023-2025
Region / City:
Oregon, USA
Topic:
Career and Technical Education, Grant Funding
Document Type:
Grant Application Request
Organization:
Oregon Department of Education
Office:
Office of Education Innovation & Improvement
Deadline:
Monday, November 6, 2023, 5:00 p.m. (PST)
Legislation Reference:
House Bill 3072, HB 5016
Funding Amount:
$7.6 million
Eligible Audience:
Educational institutions and organizations involved in Career and Technical Education
Purpose:
Revitalization of CTE programs and promotion of equity in education
Partners:
Higher Education Coordinating Commission, Bureau of Labor and Industries, employers, and other collaborators
Submission Requirements:
Application narrative, budget, project outcomes, evaluation plan
Evaluation Criteria:
Equity, partnerships, project outcomes, activities, CTE program design, sustainability, communication
Year:
2023-2025
Region / City:
Athi River, Kenya
Topic:
Supplier Registration for Goods, Works & Services
Document Type:
Tender Notice
Institution:
Kenya Meat Commission
Author:
Kenya Meat Commission
Target Audience:
Suppliers, Contractors, Service Providers
Effective Period:
2023-2025
Approval Date:
29 August 2023
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Global
Topic:
Professional Standards, Supreme Audit Institutions
Document Type:
Strategic Development Plan
Organization:
INTOSAI
Author:
INTOSAI Professional Standards Committee
Target Audience:
Supreme Audit Institutions, International Auditing Bodies
Period of Validity:
2023-2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2023-2025
Region / City:
Nairobi
Topic:
Registration of suppliers, contractors, and consultants
Document Type:
Tender Notice
Organization / Institution:
National Research Fund
Author:
National Research Fund
Target Audience:
Eligible suppliers, contractors, and consultants
Period of Validity:
Financial Years 2023-2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / city:
Republic of Serbia
Topic:
e-Government, public administration reform
Document Type:
Government policy document
Author:
Ministry of Public Administration and Local Self-Government
Target Audience:
Public administration, government officials, citizens, and businesses
Period of validity:
2023-2025
Approval Date:
December 2022
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2023-2025
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Radiographic Informatics
Document Type:
Work Plan
Organization / Institution:
Radiographic Informatics Advisory Group (RIAG)
Author:
Richard Evans OBE
Target Audience:
Radiography professionals, members of SoR, stakeholders in healthcare informatics
Effective Period:
2023-2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Context:
Work plan outlining objectives, actions, and targets for the Radiographic Informatics Advisory Group for 2023-2025, focusing on engagement, development, standards, and influence in the field of radiographic informatics.
Year:
2023-2025
Region / City:
N/A
Subject:
Labor Agreement
Document Type:
Agreement Summary
Organization / Institution:
MAPE (Minnesota Association of Professional Employees)
Author:
MAPE Negotiations Team
Target Audience:
Union members
Effective Period:
2023-2025
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2023-2025
Region / City:
Minnesota
Subject:
Wage increases, health care costs, dental plan, contract negotiations
Document Type:
Agreement, Negotiation Summary
Organization / Institution:
MAPE (Minnesota Association of Professional Employees)
Author:
MAPE
Target Audience:
MAPE members, employees in the contract
Effective Period:
July 1, 2023 – July 1, 2025
Approval Date:
TBD
Amendment Date:
TBD
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Queensland
Theme:
Obesity prevention, health policy
Document type:
Strategy, Action Plan
Organization / Institution:
Health and Wellbeing Queensland
Author:
Health and Wellbeing Queensland
Target audience:
Government, health professionals, community organizations, stakeholders in obesity prevention
Period of validity:
2023-2032
Approval date:
4 March 2022
Date of changes:
N/A
Note:
Description
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Mid and South Essex
Theme:
Equality, Diversity, Inclusion, Belonging
Document Type:
Strategy
Organ / Institution:
Integrated Care Board (ICB)
Author:
Azmi Peerun, Head of Workforce EDI and Wellbeing
Target Audience:
ICB staff, healthcare professionals, system partners
Period of Validity:
2023-2025
Approval Date:
July 2023
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
UK
Topic:
Accessible transport
Document type:
Strategy
Organization:
National Centre for Accessible Transport (ncat)
Author:
ncat
Target audience:
Disabled people, policymakers, transport operators, mobility service providers
Effective period:
2023-2025
Approval date:
12 February 2024
Modification date:
Not mentioned
Context:
A strategy outlining how ncat aims to improve transport accessibility for disabled people in the UK through evidence-based research and collaboration with stakeholders.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
North Dakota
Theme:
Environmental Services
Document Type:
Request for Proposal (RFP)
Organization / Institution:
North Dakota Department of Transportation
Author:
Ronald J. Henke, PE, Director
Target Audience:
Qualified consultants
Period of Validity:
March 1, 2023 – February 28, 2025 (with one-year extension option)
Approval Date:
February 13, 2023
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Year:
2023-2025
Region / city:
Serbia
Theme:
Renewable Energy
Document Type:
Plan
Institution:
Ministry of Energy
Author:
Government of Serbia
Target audience:
Energy sector stakeholders
Period of validity:
2023-2025
Approval Date:
Not provided
Date of changes:
Not provided
Year:
2023
Region / City:
New South Wales
Subject:
Committee Nomination
Document Type:
Nomination Form
Organization:
Dressage NSW Inc
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Equestrian NSW Members
Effective Period:
2023-2025
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Document type:
Administrative form
Issuing body:
Judicial Council of California
Related institutions:
Superior Courts of California
Purpose:
Collection of payee identification and tax information for payment processing
Jurisdiction:
California, United States
Applicable law:
California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 18646; Internal Revenue Code Section 6109(a)
Intended users:
Vendors and payees receiving payments
Tax reporting:
Form 1099
Residency classification:
California resident or nonresident
Form status:
Updated 08/26/2014