№ files_lp_3_process_7_049280
File format: docx
Character count: 3729
File size: 127 KB
This document provides details about an upcoming workshop, general meeting, and officer elections for the Dallas/Fort Worth Chapter of the American Sign Language Teachers Association.
Year:
2012
Location:
Arlington, Texas
Topic:
ASL Teacher Association Event
Document Type:
Event Announcement
Organization:
American Sign Language Teachers Association
Author:
Carolyn Stem, Vice President
Target Audience:
ASL Teachers, ASLTA Members, General Public
Event Date:
November 10, 2012
Start Time:
8:00 AM
End Time:
2:00 PM
Fee for Members:
$10.00
Fee for Non-members:
$20.00
RSVP Deadline:
November 1, 2012
Parking Information:
Lot 36 (blue), North of ERB
Workshop Description:
Workshops on ASL Teaching (topics to be announced)
Lunch Break:
11:15 AM – 12:45 PM
Meeting Description:
ASLTA-DFW General Meeting
Elections:
Officer Elections for President and Secretary
Voting Deadline:
October 8, 2012
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Fort Worth
Subject:
Joint Admission Policies
Document Type:
Policy
Institution / Organization:
Fort Worth Independent Schools Consortium
Author:
Fort Worth Independent Schools
Target Audience:
Prospective families of students applying to member schools
Period of Action:
2017
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Context
Institution:
James Worth Bagley College of Engineering
University:
Mississippi State University
Program Name:
BCoE Student Hall of Fame
Document Type:
Program guidelines and application form
Eligibility:
Undergraduate and graduate students enrolled in a BCoE degree program graduating in May, August, or December 2026
Nomination Deadline:
November 21, 2025 at 5 p.m.
Application Deadline:
January 16, 2026 at 5 p.m.
Selection Committee:
BCoE Hall of Fame Selection Committee
Number of Inductees:
Up to six undergraduate and two graduate students annually
Minimum GPA Requirement:
3.00 overall and MSU GPA for undergraduates; 3.25 overall and MSU GPA for graduates
Award:
$250 cash award and recognition ceremony in spring
Location of Recognition:
McCain Hall
Evaluation Criteria:
Academic and work accomplishments, leadership, service and character, letters of reference, interview, application statement
Application Components:
General information, academic record, disciplinary disclosure, written statement, letters of reference, interview
Academic Year:
2025–2026
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Fort Worth
Topic:
Governance, Membership, Fiscal Responsibility
Document Type:
By-Laws
Organization:
Fort Worth Quilt Guild
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Guild members
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
April 2023
Year:
2018
Region / City:
Fort Worth
Theme:
Voluntarism, Women Empowerment
Document Type:
Press Release
Organization:
The Junior League of Fort Worth, Inc.
Author:
Amy Patyk
Target Audience:
General Public, Community Leaders
Period of Action:
2018-2019
Approval Date:
June 19, 2018
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Laguna Hills, CA
Theme:
Christian Faith, Salvation, Biblical Teaching
Document Type:
Sermon
Organization / Institution:
Compass Bible Church
Author:
Dr. Mike Fabarez
Target Audience:
Christian community, Bible study groups
Period of validity:
December 2025
Date of approval:
December 20, 2025
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
2021
Region / City:
United States
Theme:
Consumer Protection
Document Type:
Anniversary Statement
Organization:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
General Public, Government Agencies
Period of Validity:
2021
Approval Date:
July 21, 2021
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2013
Issue Date:
10/13
Region / City:
Dallas–Fort Worth, Texas
Country:
United States
Organization:
Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport Board
Document Type:
Business disclosure form
Subject:
Concessions business ownership and entity information
Purpose:
Submission with bid/proposal/offer for airport concessions
Required Attachments:
Certificate of Formation or Joint Venture Agreement (if applicable)
Applicable Entities:
Corporations, partnerships, sole proprietorships, joint ventures, limited liability companies
Form Completion Requirement:
Must be submitted with bid/proposal/offer to be considered responsive
Year:
2018
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Prose: The Novel and Short Story
Document Type:
Exam questions
Institution:
International Baccalaureate
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
IB students
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Date:
October 24, 2024
Locations:
Amsterdam; Fort Worth, Texas
Company:
MTU Maintenance Lease Services B.V. (MLS)
Parent Company:
MTU Aero Engines AG
Partner Organization:
Perimeter Global Logistics (PGL)
Industry:
Aerospace maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO)
Subject:
Expansion of engine spare parts logistics network
Facility:
Spare parts warehouse at MTU Maintenance Dallas facility
Geographical Scope:
Americas and Europe
Related Operations:
Global MRO network; ON-SITEPlus services
Engines Mentioned:
CF6-80; CFM56; GE90-110/115B; V2500
Future Plans:
Planned warehouse in China in 2025
Contact Person:
Saša Lakić, Media Relations Manager MRO
Source Type:
Corporate press release
Year:
2021
Institution:
University of Maryland (UMD)
Type of document:
Survey report
Audience:
Undergraduate and graduate students, instructors
Conducted by:
Division of IT (Academic Technology Experience), Division of Student Affairs, Institutional Research, Planning, & Assessment, Teaching Learning Transformation Center
Survey period:
Fall 2021
Cohorts analyzed:
First-year, Sophomore, Junior, Senior students
Focus:
Academic preparedness, impact of COVID-19 on learning
Data source:
Student and instructor survey responses
Methodology:
Quantitative and qualitative survey analysis
Context:
Higher education, pandemic disruptions
https:
//provost.umd.edu/covid-survey-results
Survey findings:
Mixed experiences with in-person and remote learning affected perceived academic readiness, with instructors and students noting gaps in preparedness but also recognizing adequate preparation for specific courses.
Year:
2022
Region / City:
York, PA
Document Type:
Official Correspondence
Organization / Institution:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Author:
VA Regional Office
Target Audience:
David Smith (Veteran)
Period of Effectiveness:
March 1, 2021
Approval Date:
April 23, 2022
Amendment Date:
None
Evidence Reviewed:
Statement in support of claim, VA Form 21P-8416 Medical Expense Report, Care Expense Statement
Requested Information:
VA Form 21P-0969, Bill of sale for primary residence
Deadline for Submission:
60 days from April 23, 2022
Additional Instructions:
Contact details for further inquiries
Context:
Document is an official letter notifying a veteran of proposed adjustments to pension benefits due to an increase in net worth, detailing the rights to submit evidence or request a hearing.
Year:
2014
Region / City:
Worth County, GA
Theme:
Education, School Board Meeting
Document Type:
Meeting Agenda
Organization / Institution:
Worth County Board of Education
Author:
Worth County Board of Education
Target Audience:
School Board Members, Education Staff, Public
Period of Action:
May 2014
Approval Date:
May 8, 2014
Amendment Date:
None
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Commonwealth
Theme:
Heritage, History, Preservation
Document Type:
Position Statement
Organization:
Royal Life Saving Society
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Members, researchers, volunteers, general public
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
June 2025
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Global
Theme:
Christian Faith, Spirituality, Biblical Teachings
Document Type:
Sermon
Organization / Institution:
Church
Author:
Pasteur Marc E SIMEON
Target Audience:
Christian Believers
Period of Validity:
February 4th, 2024
Approval Date:
February 4th, 2024
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Virginia
Subject:
Interpreter Services, Sign Language, Government Agencies
Document Type:
Manual, Agreement
Organization:
Virginia Department for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing
Target Audience:
Qualified Sign Language Interpreters, State and Local Government Agencies
Effective Date:
January 1, 2020
Date of Approval:
January 1, 2020
Date of Last Update:
January 1, 2020
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Burlington
Subject:
Signage Regulations
Document Type:
Application Form
Authority / Institution:
Burlington City Government
Target Audience:
Property owners, contractors, and individuals applying for sign permits
Program name:
Ashland Sign & Façade Program
Document type:
Application form
Grant type:
Reimbursement grant
Administering organization:
Town of Ashland
Administering program:
Ashland Economic Development Incentive Program
Location:
Ashland, Massachusetts
Eligible applicants:
Businesses located in Ashland
Eligible improvements:
Exterior façade and sign improvements
Maximum funding amount:
Up to 50% of project cost or $5,000
Funding source:
Town funding
Approval authority:
Ashland Economic Development Advisory Group; Town Manager; Board of Selectmen
Submission requirements:
Completed application, bids, permits, supporting documents
Contact person:
Economic Development Director
Contact address:
101 Main Street, Ashland, MA 01721
Contact email:
[email protected]
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters