№ lp_2_1_18378
File format: docx
Character count: 2728
File size: 44 KB
Application for enforcement of a judgment, detailing the party information, actions sought (such as summons or warrants), and financial information related to the amount owed, interest, and fees.
Note:
Year
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Jurisdiction:
Wisconsin, United States
Type of Document:
Court Form
Subject:
Family Law, Paternity, Marriage, Child Placement
Parties:
Petitioner/Joint Petitioner A, Respondent/Joint Petitioner B
Case Number:
Specified in form
Court:
Circuit Court
Includes:
Notice of Hearing, Motion to Enforce Physical Placement Order
Instructions:
Filing and service procedures, legal warnings, representation rights
Year:
2024
Date:
May 1, 2024
City:
Cambridge, Maryland
County:
Dorchester County
Country:
United States
Document Type:
Press Release
Issuing Authority:
City of Cambridge
Office:
Office of the City Manager
Contact Person:
Tom Carroll
Subject:
Lawsuit regarding violation of 2022 Transfer Agreement covenants
Defendants:
Cambridge Waterfront Development, Inc. (CWDI); CWDI Holdings; Yacht Maintenance
Related Agreement:
2022 Transfer Agreement
Property Involved:
Approximately 10 acres of land in Cambridge
Claim Amount:
$75,000
Relief Sought:
Temporary, preliminary, and permanent injunctive relief
Year:
2024
Region / city:
European Union
Topic:
Fundamental Rights, EU Funding
Document Type:
Annual Report
Organ / institution:
European Commission
Author:
European Commission
Target audience:
EU policymakers, civil society organizations, human rights defenders, national authorities
Period of validity:
2024
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Contextual description:
Annual report providing an overview of the funding mechanisms for promoting and enforcing fundamental rights within the EU.
Year:
2024
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Subject:
Legal Procedures
Document Type:
Application Form
Organization / Institution:
High Court of Justice
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, individuals involved in property disputes
Validity Period:
Until enforcement of judgment or order
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
November 2024
Year:
2021
Region / City:
N/A
Subject Area:
Safety, Health, Environmental Protection, Quality Management
Document Type:
Educational Module
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Students in business, engineering, safety management, or related fields
Period of Application:
N/A
Date of Approval:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Nairobi
Theme:
Judicial review, public procurement
Document type:
Judgment
Organization / Institution:
High Court of Kenya
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Legal professionals, government procurement officials, and entities involved in public tenders
Effective period:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
Not specified
Year:
2005
Region / City:
Strasbourg
Theme:
Human rights, property law
Document type:
Court ruling
Authority:
European Court of Human Rights
Author:
European Court of Human Rights
Target audience:
Legal professionals, scholars
Period of validity:
N/A
Date of adoption:
15 November 2005
Date of revision:
30 August 2007
Year:
1983
Region / City:
Strasbourg
Subject:
Human rights
Document Type:
Judgment
Organ / Institution:
European Court of Human Rights
Author:
European Court of Human Rights
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, scholars, individuals interested in European human rights law
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
8 December 1983
Date of amendments:
N/A
Court:
High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts in Leeds
Case number:
BL-2021-LDS-000053
Division:
Business List (Chancery Division)
Judge:
Upper Tribunal Judge Mark West sitting as a Judge of the High Court
Date of judgment:
29 December 2025
Hearing dates:
23–27 June, 30 June, 2 July 2025
Method of delivery:
Remote hand-down by circulation and release to the National Archives
Claimants:
Umer Sufwan Pervaz; Mumtaz Akhtar Pervaz
Defendants:
Mehboob Ahmed Pervaz; Mohammed Kasim Pervaz; Mohammed Hashim Pervaz; Estate of the late Shahzada Khalid Pervaz
Subject matter:
Dissolution and accounting of a family partnership
Partnership name:
Medina Meat & Poultry Group
Date of partnership dissolution:
7 July 2016
Applicable legislation:
Partnership Act 1890
Legal representation for claimants:
Schofield Sweeney LLP
Legal representation for defendants:
Sandhill Solicitors
Document type:
Court judgment
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Quebec
Topic:
Education Law
Document Type:
Judgment
Organ / Institution:
Court of Appeal of Quebec
Author:
Court of Appeal Judges
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, educators, policy makers
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
April 3, 2025
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Note:
Year
Topic:
Garnishment procedure, legal responsibilities of garnishee
Document Type:
Legal Instruction
Authority / Institution:
Court of Arizona
Target Audience:
Garnishees involved in legal proceedings
Year:
Unknown
Region / City:
State of Wisconsin
Topic:
Family Law, Divorce, Legal Separation
Document Type:
Legal Judgment
Institution:
Wisconsin Circuit Court
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Parties involved in the case
Period of Validity:
Unknown
Approval Date:
Unknown
Date of Changes:
Unknown
Note:
Year
Year:
2026
Region / city:
Ohio, United States
Subject:
Family Law, Divorce
Document Type:
Court Judgment
Authority / Organization:
Court of Common Pleas
Author:
Judge, Magistrate
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, parties involved in divorce proceedings
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2003
Region / City:
Strasbourg
Subject:
Human Rights, Legal Aid
Document Type:
Court Judgment
Body / Institution:
European Court of Human Rights
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, scholars of human rights law
Period of Effect:
N/A
Approval Date:
7 January 2003
Date of Changes:
28 September 2004
Year:
1983
Region / city:
Strasbourg
Subject:
Human Rights Law
Document type:
Court Judgment
Institution:
European Court of Human Rights
Author:
European Court of Human Rights
Target audience:
Legal professionals, scholars of international human rights law
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
25 April 1983
Date of amendments:
N/A
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Strasbourg
Subject:
Human Rights, Immigration, Deportation
Document Type:
Court Judgment
Institution:
European Court of Human Rights
Author:
European Court of Human Rights
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, scholars, human rights organizations
Period of validity:
N/A
Date of approval:
03/07/2017
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
1998
Court:
European Court of Human Rights
Document type:
Judgment
Case name:
McGinley and Egan v. the United Kingdom
Application numbers:
21825/93; 23414/94
Judgment date:
9 June 1998
Place of judgment:
Strasbourg
Parties:
Kenneth McGinley; Edward Egan; United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Subject matter:
Access to information and alleged exposure to radiation during nuclear tests
Relevant Convention articles:
Article 6; Article 8; Article 13
Historical context:
United Kingdom nuclear tests at Christmas Island, 1957–1958
Judicial source:
International human rights court decision
Year:
2014
Region / city:
Strasbourg
Topic:
Human rights, immigration, residence permits
Document type:
Judgment
Organ / institution:
European Court of Human Rights
Author:
European Court of Human Rights, judges and legal advisers
Target audience:
Legal professionals, human rights specialists, and individuals interested in European jurisprudence
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
3 October 2014
Amendment date:
N/A
Court:
European Court of Human Rights
Section:
First Section
Application number:
75274/01
Case name:
Calleja v. Malta
Respondent State:
Republic of Malta
Applicant:
Meinrad Calleja
Judges:
C.L. Rozakis; L. Loucaides; F. Tulkens; P. Lorenzen; N. Vajić; A. Kovler; G.M. Bonnici (ad hoc)
Registrar:
S. Quesada
Date of judgment:
7 April 2005
Date of finality:
7 July 2005
Legal basis:
European Convention on Human Rights
Articles examined:
Article 5 § 3; Article 6 § 1
Type of document:
Judicial decision
Subject matter:
Length of pre-trial detention and criminal proceedings
Place of judgment:
Strasbourg
Procedural posture:
Judgment on the merits