№ files_lp_3_process_9_16947
File format: docx
Character count: 6308
File size: 25 KB
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Czech Republic
Topic:
COVID-19 Travel Guidelines
Document Type:
Travel Advisory
Institution:
Czech Government
Author:
Ministry of the Interior, Ministry of Health
Target Audience:
Travelers to the Czech Republic
Effective Period:
2020
Date of Approval:
2020
Date of Amendments:
Ongoing
Testing Requirement:
PCR, Antigen
Quarantine Requirement:
Yes
Test Sites:
Václav Havel International Airport, Other Locations
Mask Requirement:
Yes, Nationwide
Exception:
Various categories of travelers
Additional Information:
Official sources for COVID-19 regulations
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Victoria
Subject:
COVID-19 Quarantine
Document Type:
Government Report
Agency / Institution:
Victorian Government
Author:
Victorian Government
Target Audience:
Public, Government Officials
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
2021
Date of Revisions:
N/A
Year:
N/A
Region / city:
N/A
Theme:
Zoonoses, Veterinary Regulations
Document type:
Annex
Organization / Institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target audience:
Veterinary authorities, importers, institutions handling non-human primates
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Nepal
Topic:
Quarantine Pests
Document Type:
Official Publication
Agency:
National Plant Quarantine
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Not specified
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2015
Region / City:
China
Theme:
Administrative reform, quarantine regulations
Document Type:
Legal decree
Issuing Body:
AQSIQ (General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine)
Author:
AQSIQ
Target Audience:
Relevant government authorities, businesses involved in animal and plant importation
Period of Validity:
From November 25, 2015, onwards
Approval Date:
November 25, 2015
Amendment Date:
November 6, 2015
Topic:
COVID-19 exposure, isolation, and quarantine guidance
Type of document:
Public health guidance
Issuing authority:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Geographic scope:
United States
Related disease:
COVID-19
Applicable population:
Individuals exposed to or infected with COVID-19
Testing requirement:
Negative COVID-19 test required to return to work
Isolation period:
5 days for most cases, up to 10–20 days for severe illness or immunocompromised individuals
Quarantine period:
5 or 10 days depending on vaccination status
Definition included:
Close contact defined as within 6 feet for 15 minutes or more over 24 hours
Source URL:
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/quarantine-isolation.html
Year:
2022
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Agricultural regulations, plant diseases and pests
Document Type:
Government regulation
Agency / Organization:
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
Author:
USDA-APHIS
Target Audience:
Agricultural producers, nurseries, and businesses involved in the interstate movement of citrus stock
Effective Period:
Ongoing with updates pending approval
Approval Date:
March 2022
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Academic support during COVID-related absence
Document Type:
School communication
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Tom Baker, Principal
Target Audience:
Parents and students
Action Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Contextual description:
Notification of available academic support options for students during COVID quarantine or illness, including access to live instruction and asynchronous assignments.
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Wicklow, Ireland
Theme:
Cooking, Social Media, Quarantine Life
Document Type:
Article
Author:
Guy Sinnott
Target Audience:
Social media users, cooking enthusiasts
Period of Action:
March - April 2020
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Topic:
Pandemic response and infection control in detention facilities
Document type:
Operational protocol / pandemic response plan
Institution:
Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
Department:
Office of Health Services
Responsible authority:
Designated Health Authority (DHA)
Applicable facilities:
Juvenile detention facilities
Target population:
Staff, youth residents, visitors, and vendors
Health screening measures:
Temperature checks and health questionnaires prior to facility entry
Temperature threshold:
Above 100 degrees for facility entry denial
Screening records retention period:
12 months
Quarantine protocol:
Isolation of symptomatic youth in designated quarantine areas
Medical response:
On-site medical evaluation and monitoring of symptomatic youth
Emergency response coordination:
Notification of first responders and use of PPE when symptoms are present
Transportation restrictions:
Limited transport for symptomatic or confirmed cases except emergencies
Sanitation measures:
Daily disinfection of surfaces and facility areas
Protective equipment:
Masks, gloves, gowns, and other PPE required during contact with quarantined individuals
Sanitation supplies management:
Facility storage and regional redistribution during shortages
At-risk population monitoring:
Identification and monitoring of youth with compromised immune systems
Visitation regulation:
Subject to directives from Detention Services HQ and DJJ during a pandemic
Year:
2023
Region / Country:
Montenegro
Subject:
Plant health protection, quarantine pests
Document Type:
Official regulatory list
Authority / Institution:
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management of Montenegro
Legal Basis:
Law on Plant Health Protection, Articles 8(3) and 9(2)
Scope:
Lists I.A and II.A – pests whose introduction and spread are prohibited
Categories Included:
Bacteria, Fungi and oomycetes, Insects and mites
Reference System:
EPPO pest codes
Effective Date:
2023
Publication:
Official Gazette of Montenegro No. 28/06, 28/11, 48/15
Year:
2015
Organization:
International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC)
Type of document:
Meeting agenda
Location:
Virtual / Online
Panel:
Technical Panel on Forest Quarantine (TPFQ)
Topics:
Forest quarantine, ISPM 15, wood and tree seed standards, phytosanitary issues
Date of meeting:
10 June 2015
Date of last update:
2 June 2015
Presenters:
Dubon, Ormsby, Allen, Wlodarczyk, Sela, Ndikontar, Horn
Related documents:
ISPM 15 explanatory document, Draft Wood ISPM, Draft Handicraft ISPM
Year:
2000
Jurisdiction:
United States
Subject:
Public health, communicable diseases, quarantine
Document type:
Federal regulation
Issuing authority:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services
Legal basis:
Public Health Service Act Sections 215, 311, 361-369; 31 U.S.C. 9701
Scope:
Interstate travel, air carriers, vessels, military transport
Target population:
Individuals exposed to quarantinable communicable diseases
Implementation date:
August 16, 2000
Amendments:
As noted in Federal Register
Includes:
Definitions, procedures for isolation, quarantine, conditional release, medical examination, reporting, penalties
Year:
2026
Region / city:
Queensland and Victoria, Australia
Topic:
Agriculture, Biosecurity, Banana Industry
Document type:
Communication briefing / Information notice
Organization:
Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries (DAF); Federal Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF)
Author:
DAF Agri-Science Queensland
Target audience:
Banana industry stakeholders, importers, researchers
Period of effect:
2026 and ongoing
Facilities involved:
DAF banana PEQ glasshouse; DAFF Mickleham PEQ facility
Services covered:
Tissue culture, diagnostics, banana import pathway
Funding:
Industry contributions, R&D levies, commercial user-pays model
Note:
Summary
Year:
2022
Region / City:
United States, Pennsylvania
Subject:
Public health and animal importation
Document type:
Official letter
Organization:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Author:
Christopher Braden, MD
Recipient:
Lisa Jones-Engel, Ph.D
Purpose:
Guidance on nonhuman primate importation and incident response
Incident date:
January 21, 2022
Quarantine duration:
31 days
Species involved:
Cynomolgus macaques
Number of animals:
100
Outcome:
Three macaques euthanized, 97 survived
Health monitoring:
Tuberculosis testing and zoonotic disease surveillance
Regulatory reference:
42 CFR part 71.53
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Panama
Subject:
Plant Health and Agricultural Pests
Document Type:
Regulatory List
Issuing Authority:
Ministry of Agricultural Development, National Direction of Plant Health
Target Audience:
Importers, exporters, agricultural producers, phytosanitary inspectors
Scope:
Fresh and dried fruits, nuts, vegetables, wood, and propagation material
Pest Classification:
Insects
Application:
Consumption and propagation of plant products
Regulatory Status:
Quarantine pests under national legislation
Note:
Year
Document Type:
KB Article
Year:
2025
Region / City:
New York City
Theme:
City Planning
Document Type:
Public Notice
Organ / Institution:
City Planning Commission
Author:
City Planning Commission
Target Audience:
Public, Stakeholders
Period of Action:
October 8, 2025
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Software Licensing Agreement
Document Type:
Legal Agreement
Organization / Institution:
Schrödinger, L.L.C.
Author:
Schrödinger, L.L.C.
Target Audience:
Licensee, Users
Effective Period:
3 years
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
License Type:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters