№ files_lp_4_process_1_50172
File format: docx
Character count: 3908
File size: 56 KB
High Court criminal review judgment examining duplication of convictions arising from charges of assaulting a police officer and damaging the officer’s uniform during the same incident.
Country:
Namibia
Court:
High Court of Namibia Northern Local Division
Place of hearing:
Oshakati
Case number:
CR 16/2018
High Court review case reference number:
204/2017
Neutral citation:
S v Johannes (CR 16/2018) [2018] NAHCNLD 33
Type of document:
Review judgment
Legal field:
Criminal law
Subject:
Duplication of convictions and charges in criminal proceedings
Parties:
The State v Kondjamba Johannes
Accused:
Kondjamba Johannes
Judges:
M A Tommasi; M Cheda
Date delivered:
12 April 2018
Relevant legislation:
Police Act, 1990 (Act 19 of 1990) section 35(1); section 35(2)(a)
Charges:
Assault on a member of the Police force; assault by threat; malicious damage to property
Procedural posture:
Automatic review of magistrate’s court proceedings
Decision:
Conviction and sentence on count 1 confirmed; conviction and sentence on count 3 set aside
Key legal principle:
Application of the single intent test and same evidence test to determine duplication of convictions
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Windhoek
Subject:
Criminal Procedure – Bail Appeal
Document Type:
Legal Judgment
Organization / Institution:
High Court of Namibia
Author:
Claasen J, Christiaan J
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, judiciary
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
7 April 2025
Date of Amendments:
Not Applicable
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Windhoek
Theme:
Legal Case, Court Ruling
Document Type:
Court Ruling
Court/Institution:
High Court of Namibia
Judge:
Honourable Lady Justice De Jager J
Case No:
HC-MD-CIV-ACT-OTH-2020/02046, INT-HC-OTH-2024/01082
Hearing Date:
1 April 2025
Delivery Date:
23 April 2025
Neutral Citation:
Wirtz v Van Wyk (HC-MD-CIV-ACT-OTH-2020/02046) [2025] NAHCMD 191 (23 April 2025)
Applicants:
Robert Douglas Wirtz, Windhoek Renovations CC, LH Equipment Sales CC
Respondent:
Johannes Erasmus van Wyk
Relevant Legal Rule:
Rule 63(6) of the Rules of Court
Country:
Republic of Namibia
Court:
High Court of Namibia, Main Division, Windhoek
Case Number:
I 402/2014
Neutral Citation:
W W B v Johannes Aipanda N O (I 402/2014) [2018] NAHCMD 22
Parties:
W W B (Plaintiff) v Johannes Aipanda N.O (Defendant)
Judge:
PRINSLOO J
Dates Heard:
07 July 2017; 25 September 2017; 31 October 2017; 08 November 2017
Date Delivered:
07 February 2018
Date of Reasons:
09 February 2018
Type of Document:
High Court judgment (divorce proceedings)
Subject Matter:
Divorce; forfeiture of benefits; marriage in community of property; customary land rights; joint estate division
Relief Sought:
Restitution of conjugal rights; divorce; custody of minor child; specific forfeiture of immovable property; declaration regarding improvements to traditional homestead
Key Legislation Considered:
Divorce Laws Amendment Ordinance; Communal Land Reform Act 5 of 2002
Property Concerned:
Erf 375, Ohima Street, Okuruyangava, Katutura, Windhoek; traditional homestead at Omahalya-Omape, Omusati Region
Outcome:
Restitution of conjugal rights granted with conditional dissolution of marriage; specific forfeiture of urban immovable property granted to plaintiff; improvements at traditional homestead declared sole property of defendant; each party to bear own costs
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Windhoek
Topic:
Motor vehicle collision, negligence, ambulance
Document Type:
Court Judgment
Institution:
High Court of Namibia
Author:
Judge Usiku
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, parties involved in the case
Period of Action:
29 May 2021
Approval Date:
28 February 2023
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2018
Country:
Zimbabwe
Court:
High Court of Zimbabwe
Case name:
R M Africa Property Consultants versus Johannes Muchimika
Type of document:
Civil appeal judgment
Judges:
Mwayera J; Munangati-Manongwa J
Place of hearing:
Harare
Hearing date:
18 July 2017
Judgment date:
18 January 2018
Parties:
R M Africa Property Consultants (appellant); Johannes Muchimika (respondent)
Legal representatives:
T. S. Manjengwah (for the appellant); G. Simango (for the respondent)
Subject:
Estate agent commission dispute arising from cancellation of an immovable property sale agreement
Related parties:
Estate Late Stephen Omar Hayisa represented by Francis Haisa (Executor Dative); Delscart Properties (Pvt) Ltd
Legislation cited:
Estate Agents Act [Chapter 27:17]
Key legal issue:
Locus standi of an estate agent to claim commission from a purchaser under a penalty clause in a sale agreement
Monetary amount claimed:
USD 4,427.50
Outcome:
Appeal dismissed with costs
Year:
2018
Region / City:
Ongwediva, Oshana Region
Topic:
Law, Property Execution
Document Type:
Judgment
Institution:
High Court of Namibia
Author:
Judge M Cheda
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, general public interested in property law
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
04 December 2018
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Jaar:
2019
Regio / Stad:
Oshakati
Tematika:
Recusal application, impartiality, judicial review
Tipe dokument:
Hofbeslissing
Organ / instellings:
High Court of Namibia
Skrywer:
NAMWEYA AJ
Doelgroep:
Partye in die hofgeding
Periode van geldigheid:
1 Augustus 2019 tot 9 Desember 2019
Datum van goedkeuring:
24 September 2019
Datum van veranderinge:
Geen veranderinge aangedui
Judgment in Nghipangwa v Mwaetako (HC-NLD-CIV-MOT-REV-2023/00039) [2026] NAHCNLD 3 (20 January 2026)
Year:
2026
Country:
Republic of Namibia
Court:
High Court of Namibia, Northern Local Division, Oshakati
Case number:
HC-NLD-CIV-MOT-REV-2023/00039
Neutral citation:
Nghipangwa v Mwaetako (HC-NLD-CIV-MOT-REV-2023/00039) [2026] NAHCNLD 3
Judge:
Munsu J
Hearing date:
10 September 2025
Date delivered:
16 January 2026
Reasons date:
20 January 2026
Parties:
Fillemon Nghipangwa v Linda Mwaetako and Others
Applicant:
Fillemon Nghipangwa
Respondents:
Linda Mwaetako; Mwadhinomho Martha ya Kristian Nelumbu; Oukwanyama Traditional Authority; Arnolf Shihafelene Hangula Uahengo
Subject matter:
Review of suspension and election of village headman
Legal topic:
Administrative law; procedural fairness; natural justice
Type of document:
Judicial decision
Outcome:
Application for review dismissed with costs; matter removed from the roll
Country:
Republic of Namibia
Court:
High Court of Namibia, Northern Local Division, Oshakati
Case Title:
The State v Kotokeni Johannes Lucas
Case Number:
CR 23/2024
High Court Review Number:
149/2024
Neutral Citation:
S v Lucas (CR 23/2024) [2024] NAHCNLD 68 (21 June 2024)
Judges:
Kesslau J; Salionga J
Date Heard:
21 June 2024
Date Delivered:
21 June 2024
Type of Document:
Review Judgment
Legal Basis:
Section 302 and Section 262(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 (as amended)
Lower Court:
Magistrate’s Court of Eenhana
Charges:
Housebreaking with intent to commit a crime unknown to the State; Housebreaking with intent to steal and theft
Outcome:
Conviction on count 1 set aside and substituted with housebreaking with intent to steal; sentences on counts 1 and 2 confirmed
Sentence:
Twelve months’ imprisonment
Year:
2020
Country:
Namibia
Court:
High Court of Namibia, Northern Local Division
Location:
Oshakati
Case number:
CC 04/2015
Parties:
The State v Uunandapo Eliaser
Judge:
Tommasi J
Dates heard:
5–18 May 2017; 23 May 2017; 21–24 August 2017; 28–29 August 2017; 7–8 September 2017; 19 February 2018; 6 March 2018; 19 May 2018; 22 March 2018; 14 and 17 January 2019; 21 and 23 January 2019; 28 February 2019; 20–21 February 2020; 1 June 2020; 4 June 2020; 16 June 2020
Date delivered:
16 June 2020
Date of reasons:
25 June 2020
Legal topics:
Criminal law, murder, rape, robbery, forensic evidence, DNA analysis
Type of document:
Court judgment
Charges:
Murder; robbery with aggravating circumstances; rape; housebreaking with intent to steal and theft
Outcome:
Guilty of murder and rape; not guilty of robbery and housebreaking with intent to steal and theft
Legislation cited:
Combating of Rape Act 8 of 2000; Criminal Procedure Act; Act 51 of 1977
Year:
2016
Jurisdiction:
Namibia, Northern Local Division, Oshakati
Case Number:
CA 53/2013
Type of Document:
Court judgment
Court:
High Court of Namibia
Judges:
JANUARY J, TOMMASI J
Appellant:
The State
Respondent:
Johannes Immanuel
Charge:
Theft of motor vehicle gearbox
Date Heard:
25 July 2016
Date Delivered:
18 November 2016
Neutral Citation:
S v Immanuel [2016] NAHCNLD 92
Outcome:
Acquittal set aside, substituted with conviction for theft
Evidence Considered:
Admissible evidence supporting prima facie case
Country:
Namibia
Court:
High Court of Namibia, Northern Local Division, Oshakati
Case title:
The State v Katiku Hengua
Case number:
CR 32/2024
High Court review number:
566/2024
Judges:
Lady Justice Salionga J; Mr Justice Kesslau J
Judgment type:
Review judgment
Date delivered:
6 September 2024
Neutral citation:
S v Hengua (CR 32/2024) [2024] NAHCNLD 91
Lower court:
Magistrate’s Court of Opuwo
Legal basis for review:
Sections 302–304 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977
Subject matter:
Dealing in a dependence-producing substance
Substance mentioned:
“Skunk cannabis” (0.232 grams)
Legislation referenced:
Abuse of Dependence-Producing Substances and Rehabilitation Centres Act 41 of 1971
Outcome:
Conviction and sentence set aside
Reason for decision:
Misidentification of the substance under the Act, absence of evidence proving the nature of the substance and the accused’s knowledge, and incorrect calculation of the alleged value