№ lp_1_19699
File format: docx
Character count: 12760
File size: 77 KB
This document analyzes the alleged illegal actions and transparency violations surrounding the World Health Organization’s recent amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) and their broader implications for global health governance.
Year:
2024
Region / city:
Geneva
Topic:
International Health Regulations, WHO, Global Governance, Health Policy
Document type:
Report
Organization:
WHO
Author:
kla.tv
Target audience:
General public, policy analysts, legal experts
Period of validity:
2024
Approval date:
June 1, 2024
Date of changes:
June 1, 2024
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2025
Region:
Neath Port Talbot County Borough
Topic:
Social care services for children with disabilities
Document Type:
Consultation paper
Organization:
Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council
Target Audience:
Children with disabilities, young people, parent carers, stakeholders
Consultation Period:
28 April 2025 – 27 July 2025
Services Covered:
Family Link, Park House
Purpose:
Proposal to expand and potentially bring overnight short break services under direct Council provision
Assessment:
Children and young people assessed through Children’s Social Services
Year:
2026
Location:
Macon, Georgia, USA
Topic:
Health care, Intellectual and developmental disabilities
Document type:
Press release
Organization:
Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities (DBHDD)
Partners:
Mercer University, River Edge Behavioral Health
Facility size:
34,000 square feet
Expected opening:
January 2025
Services offered:
Behavioral health assessments, dentistry, psychiatry, neurology, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech and language pathology, ophthalmology, outpatient care
Target audience:
Adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities in Georgia
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Harborview Medical Center
Topic:
Employee Rest and Meal Break Policies
Document Type:
Agreement
Organization / Institution:
SEIU Healthcare 1199NW, Harborview Medical Center
Author:
SEIU Healthcare 1199NW, Harborview Medical Center
Target Audience:
Hospital Employees
Effective Period:
From November 1, 2024
Approval Date:
Tentatively agreed to
Date of Changes:
November 1, 2024
Health and safety considerations:
Yes
Meal Break Policy:
Unpaid 30-minute meal break for shifts over 5 hours
Rest Break Policy:
Paid 15-minute rest break for every 4 hours worked
Committee Work:
Harborview-wide Joint Labor Management Committee, monthly meetings from January 1, 2025
Description:
A formal agreement outlining the rest and meal break policies for Harborview Medical Center employees, including specific provisions for health care workers.
Year:
2016
Region / City:
Pasadena, California / Glasgow, UK
Topic:
Fibre breaks in suspension systems
Document Type:
Internal working note
Institution:
LIGO Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, University of Glasgow
Authors:
A. S. Bell, G. Hammond, J. Hough, K. Strain, N. Robertson, S. Rowan
Target Audience:
LIGO Scientific Collaboration
Date of Approval:
11th January 2016
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Period of Action:
2011–2013
Year:
2024 - 2025
Region / City:
Wakefield
Topic:
Short Breaks for children and young people with SEND
Document Type:
Annual Report
Organization:
Wakefield Local Authority
Author:
Wakefield Local Authority
Target Audience:
Families of children and young people with SEND, healthcare professionals, service providers
Period of Effect:
2024 - 2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2025-26
Region / City:
Leeds
Topic:
Fun activities and short breaks for children and young people with SEND
Document type:
Directory
Organization:
Leeds City Council
Target audience:
Children and young people aged 0-18 with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND)
Period of validity:
September 2025
Approval date:
September 2025
Last modified:
September 2025
Contact:
[email protected]
Service type:
Universal services, Targeted services
Age range:
0-18 years
Activities:
Play schemes, youth clubs, leisure activities, arts, sports, outdoor activities, personal care services
Breaks offered:
Weekend, after-school, holiday providers
Principles of care:
Intimate care, personal care
Activity provider:
Endorphins, Leeds Mencap, ASAS
Service cost:
Varies by provider
Context:
Directory of available services and activities for children and young people in Leeds with SEND, including details on how to access them and the costs involved.
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Merton
Topic:
Short Breaks for children and young people with disabilities
Document Type:
Form
Organization / Institution:
London Borough of Merton
Author:
London Borough of Merton
Target Audience:
Families and carers of children with disabilities
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Contextual Description:
A form for applying for short breaks for children and young people under 18 with disabilities in Merton.
Date:
January 25, 2024
Location:
Pecos, Texas
Organization:
Cyclone Ballparks
Note:
Organization
The Sports Facilities Companies
Project Developer:
Mammoth
Contact:
Cristina Gil, Marketing Manager
Event Date:
February 20, 2024
Rain Date:
February 21, 2024
Project Completion:
September or October 2024
Type of Document:
Press Release
Subject:
Phase II Expansion Groundbreaking Ceremony
Facilities Added:
Six additional baseball fields, two food and beverage buildings, 1,100-square-foot event space, expanded parking
Total Fields After Expansion:
11 baseball diamonds
Total Parking After Completion:
Over 700 paved spaces
Date:
17 June 2019
Location:
Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Organization:
Abdul Latif Jameel Land
Parent Organization:
Abdul Latif Jameel
Spokesperson:
Mohammed Abdul Latif Jameel, Chairman and CEO
Project Name:
Dari Q
Project Type:
Residential real estate development
Number of Units:
158 housing units
Apartment Types:
Two-bedroom, three-bedroom, and four-bedroom apartments
Number of Floorplans:
13
Facilities:
Retail outlets, rooftop gardens, rooftop swimming pool, gymnasium, outdoor seating areas, multipurpose yard, games room, ballroom, guest lounge
Related Developments:
J-ONE; Gallery N
Sales Model:
Pre-sales (off-plan sales)
Construction Period:
18 months
Strategic Framework:
Saudi Vision 2030
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Coventry
Theme:
Special Educational Needs & Disabilities
Document Type:
Event Schedule
Organization:
Coventry City Council
Target Audience:
Parents and Carers of Children with Disabilities
Period of Activity:
February Half-Term
Approval Date:
2026-01-26
Activity Date Range:
2026-02-16 to 2026-02-19
Required Documents:
Short Breaks passport, DLA letter or supporting letter
Activity Locations:
Broad Park House, Centre AT7, Mosaic Hub, Families For All
Context:
A schedule of community-based short breaks for children with disabilities in Coventry, offering various activities for different age groups.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Wilkinsburg, PA
Theme:
Affordable Housing, Community Development
Document Type:
Press Release
Organization / Institution:
ACTION-Housing, Hosanna House
Author:
Katherine Chamberlain
Target Audience:
Community Stakeholders, Local Government, Media
Effective Period:
February 28, 2025 - ongoing
Approval Date:
February 28, 2025
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Falkirk
Theme:
Carer Support, Short Breaks Services
Document Type:
Service Statement
Institution:
Falkirk Health and Social Care Partnership
Author:
Falkirk Health and Social Care Partnership
Target Audience:
Unpaid carers and professionals working with carers
Period of Effectiveness:
December 2023 onwards
Approval Date:
April 2024
Date of Changes:
December 2023
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Southwark
Topic:
Data Protection, Privacy Policy
Document Type:
Privacy Notice
Organization:
Southwark Council
Author:
Southwark Council
Target Audience:
Parents, carers, children, young people, and schools
Period of Validity:
Until end March 2029
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Physical Activity, Health Education
Document Type:
Guide
Organization:
Multiple Organizations
Author:
Multiple Authors
Target Audience:
Educators, Schools
Validity Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Manchester
Theme:
Security services, Licensing
Document type:
Consultation questionnaire
Organ / Institution:
Home Office
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Security professionals, Employers, Public bodies
Validity period:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Victoria, Australia
Topic:
HIV treatment, healthcare program
Document type:
Official publication
Organization / Institution:
Victorian Government, Department of Health
Author:
Victorian Government
Target audience:
Healthcare professionals, HIV patients, healthcare policy makers
Date of approval:
August 2025
Date of changes:
Not specified
Reference no:
HPV (GBMSM) PGD
Version no:
v5.0
Valid from:
1 September 2025
Review date:
1 April 2028
Expiry date:
1 September 2028
Author:
Suki Hunjunt, Sharif Ismail, David Green
Region / city:
England
Target audience:
Healthcare practitioners administering HPV vaccine to GBMSM
Type of document:
Patient Group Direction
Organisation:
UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA)
Date of approval:
17 July 2025
Date of modifications:
16 July 2025
Context:
A formal Patient Group Direction for the administration of HPV vaccine to GBMSM, detailing legal, clinical, and procedural requirements for healthcare practitioners in England.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Global
Topic:
Vaccine Policy, Maternal Health, Group B Streptococcus
Document type:
WHO Guidance
Institution:
World Health Organization (WHO)
Author:
WHO ECVP
Target audience:
Policymakers, Vaccine Developers, Public Health Authorities
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
March 11, 2025
Date of changes:
Not specified