№ lp_2_3_33197
File format: docx
Character count: 3957
File size: 337 KB
Detailed specifications for the installation and operation of digital speed limit signs in work zones, including materials, installation guidelines, and operational requirements.
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Work Zone
Topic:
Traffic Safety
Document Type:
Technical Specification
Agency / Organization:
NCDOT
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Engineers, Contractors
Effective Period:
Until 12/16/2025
Approval Date:
5/10/2021
Amendment Date:
12/16/2025
Note:
Contextual Description
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2025
Document type:
Worksheet
Regulatory focus:
Human Research Protection and Engagement
Applicable regulations:
DHHS Common Rule, FDA regulations
Intended users:
Designated/Staff Reviewers
Purpose:
Determining organizational engagement in Human Research
Scope:
Non-exempt Human Research
Reference documents:
HRP-401 Checklist, FDA Information Sheet January 1998
Date issued:
12/16/2025
Retention requirement:
Not required
Document code:
HRP-301
Date:
12/16/2025
Document type:
Worksheet
Subject:
Institutional Review Board review materials preparation
Topic:
Human research oversight and protocol review documentation
Purpose:
Guidance for preparing materials for IRB review processes
Institutional body:
Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Audience:
IRB staff, IRB members, designated reviewers, scientific or scholarly reviewers, consultants
Related forms and documents:
HRP-310, HRP-311, HRP-312, HRP-314, HRP-314a, HRP-315, HRP-316, HRP-317, HRP-318, HRP-320, HRP-321, HRP-323, HRP-333, HRP-334, HRP-410, HRP-411, HRP-412, HRP-413, HRP-414, HRP-415, HRP-416, HRP-417, HRP-418, HRP-419, HRP-441
Review stages covered:
Initial review, continuing review, review of modifications, review of new information
Special review categories:
Humanitarian Use Device (HUD)
Regulatory references:
DHHS approved protocol and consent documentation; HIPAA authorization waiver
Content structure:
Checklist of required materials for different IRB review roles and submission types
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Victoria, Australia
Topic:
Waste to Energy, Circular Economy, Environmental Regulation
Document type:
Regulatory Impact Statement
Organization / Agency:
Recycling Victoria
Author:
Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action
Legislation referenced:
Circular Economy (Waste Reduction and Recycling) Act 2021; Environment Protection Act 2017; Environment Legislation Amendment Acts 2022 and 2023
Policy framework:
Victorian Waste to Energy Framework 2021; Circular Economy Policy
Target audience:
Policymakers, regulatory bodies, industry stakeholders
Period of implementation:
2025–2050
Data sources:
Victoria’s Waste Projection Model, National Electricity Market, EPA datasets
Note:
Year
Topic:
Lead Abatement, Safety Procedures
Document Type:
Work Plan
Agency / Organization:
Environmental Health and Safety Office
Target Audience:
Contractors, Workers, Safety Supervisors
Work Description:
Lead hazard control measures, including abatement, encapsulation, and removal.
Project Location:
Site with known lead hazards
Control Measures:
HEPA vacuums, wet methods, protective clothing, respirators, etc.
Equipment and Materials:
HEPA vacuums, protective clothing, respirators, and other abatement tools
Crew:
Lead abatement supervisor and a crew of workers
Competent Person:
Lead abatement supervisor (certified)
Technology Considered:
HUD Guidelines for lead hazard control, specialized equipment for lead abatement
Respirators:
NIOSH/MSHA approved respirators provided to workers
Protective Clothing:
Disposable, breathable fabric clothing worn at all times
Hygiene Facilities:
Hand washing and decontamination facilities provided on-site
Air Monitoring Data:
Air sampling to be conducted for lead monitoring
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Not specified
Subject:
Academic research, Scientific articles
Document type:
Article
Institution:
Elsevier B.V.
Author:
Firstname Lastname a, Firstname Lastname b, Firstname Lastname b
Target audience:
Academic, Researchers
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Theme:
Baseball, Outfield Training
Document Type:
Training Manual
Target Audience:
Coaches, Baseball Trainers
Context:
This document outlines strategies and drills for training outfield players in baseball, focusing on skills, techniques, and philosophies for different age groups.
Document Type:
Application guidelines
Subject:
Research project proposal requirements
Page Limit:
4 pages
Submission Format:
Single PDF document
Submitting Body:
Review committee
Sections Required:
Rationale; Background; Sample Information; Project Details
Project Components:
Hypothesis; Methodology; Power and effect size; Data analysis; Sample management; Plans for the next phase
Scope:
Biospecimen-based research projects
Evaluation Condition:
Non-adherence to criteria results in no review
Date:
4 December 2023
Embargo:
00:01, Monday 4 December 2023
Geographical Area:
Wales, United Kingdom
Subject:
Two-child limit on benefits and child poverty
Document Type:
Press release
Issuing Organisation:
End Child Poverty Coalition
Data Sources:
Department for Work and Pensions; HMRC; Department for Communities Northern Ireland
Referenced Organisation:
Bevan Foundation
Spokesperson:
Dr Steffan Evans, Head of Policy (Poverty)
Statistical Reference Period:
2021/22 (poverty rates data)
Affected Population:
Children in families with three or more children born after 6 April 2017
Policy Reference Date:
6 April 2017
Note:
Year
Topic:
Environmental Regulation
Document Type:
Application Form
Organization:
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation
Target Audience:
Facility Operators
Note:
Primary Institution
Co-Authors:
Please consider defining co-authors at time of presentation. Further info: Preparing Your MPOG Manuscript Requirements: ICMJE requirements for co-authorship
Statistician(s):
Please note, if statisticians are seeking access to case-level data to execute the proposed analysis, they must have a primary appointment (i.e. non-adjunct/affiliate faculty appointment) at the active MPOG site for which the IRB is obtained.
Type of Study:
<< Exploratory / Retrospective Observational / Prospective Trial >>
Data Source(s):
<< MPOG Database / Surgical Registry (e.g. STS, NSQIP) / Other (describe) >>
IRB Number/Status:
<> / <>☐ IRB is specific to this project ☐ IRB specifies that dataset is a limited dataset (i.e., not de-identified)☐ PI is listed on the study IRB
Hypotheses / Aims:
Please be sure to describe how you plan to define your cohort, exposure, and outcome Tip: review Tips & Tricks Modules on the MPOG website: “MPOG Research Process Overview” “Developing a Research Proposal” Please be sure to describe your cohort, exposure (if applicable), and outcome.
Number of Patients/Participants:
Please list the cohort sample size estimated using MPOG DataDirect
Resources (Brief summary of resources for data collection, personnel, financial):
STOP Before investing the substantial time to develop the rest of this proposal, please submit the Cover Sheet to the MPOG Coordinating Center via the ‘Research Consultation Form,’ as detailed in Step 3 of the MPOG website --> Research --> “Research Proposal Process”. Submission of the Cover Sheet enables the MPOG Central Research Team to provide early feedback on your project idea, in its formative stages, in order to: ensure feasibility; identify potential collaborators across MPOG who are developing similar projects; position your project for maximal chance of successful publication in a high-impact journal. Please note, successful completion of an MPOG project typically requires an integrated team-based scientific approach with: Clinical subject matter expertise (usually with a primary medical qualification and perioperative clinical practice insight), and Statistical methods expertise (usually with doctoral level training and experience in public health science, e.g. biostatistics, epidemiology) Please consider seeking collaboration from those with complementary expertise to ensure these skills are reflected in your study team. The remainder of this template includes all the sections necessary to complete your PCRC proposal. Please include all the following sections as applicable to your project. The MPOG Central Research team is committed to your success!
Introduction (target 300-500 words; limit 750 words) Tip:
consider writing the Introduction and Methods, exactly as intended for submission to target journal (links to Instructions for Authors can be found here: Anesthesiology, BJA, JAMA, A&A). The introduction should cover: What is the significance of the clinical problem being addressed? What current gaps exist in understanding this problem? How will this project address this gap and advance clinical care and/or research knowledge? What is the primary (and secondary if applicable) aim(s) / hypothes(es)? [hypotheses should be predictive] Note: Occasionally, PCRC proposals may have 2-3 aims, although each proposal is intended to correspond to one manuscript. For proposals with 2-3 aims, please clearly identify which outcomes / exposures / covariates / statistical analyses / power analyses correspond to each aim. For proposals exceeding the scope of 2-3 aims, please consider developing separate PCRC proposals, or discussing with the MPOG Coordinating Center.
Methods Tip:
review Tips & Tricks Module on the MPOG website: “Developing a Research Question Answerable with MPOG Data”
Study Design Please include:
Type of study (e.g. exploratory, retrospective, prospective, etc.) IRB approval/pending approval statement
Reporting Guidelines:
Please review the EQUATOR Network and determine the appropriate guidelines for reporting your proposal and that your proposal is in accordance with the checklist. Common examples include: Observational studies using routinely collected EHR data (i.e., MPOG data) - RECORD extension of the STROBE guidelines Clinical prediction or diagnostic models - TRIPOD guidelines Systematic reviews and meta-analysis - PRISMA guidelines Quality Improvement Studies - SQUIRE guidelines
Study Population Tip:
review Tips & Tricks Module on the MPOG website: “Using DataDirect for Self-Serve Data Access” Text to include: Date range Participating institutions (or selection criteria for institutions) Please state whether non-US institutions should be included in study, versus US institutions only NOTE: EHR Data from international sites may be different from US Sites (e.g., CPT Codes may not be available). Including both US and International Sites may add a layer of complexity to the analysis.
Study population Inclusion criteria – Which cases/patients are included in the dataset that you will receive (e.g., certain timeframes, procedures, ages). Some notes:
Start dates earlier than Jan 1st, 2015 have less consistent data quality compared to more recent dates. End dates later than 3 months before the current date may have lower rates of data completeness. Consider using a pre-defined starting population, such as “Intraoperative Research Standard” or “Outcome Research Standard”; see MPOG DataDirect for details.
Exclusion/Screening criteria – Those criteria your team will want to use to exclude/screen cases from the dataset you receive, as part of your analysis processes. For example, if you list “Ou:
Demonstration of Inclusions vs. Exclusions, and Initial Dataset received from MPOG Central vs. Final Analytic Dataset that study team creates
Covariates Tip:
Review the Tips & Tricks Module on the MPOG website, “Transforming Raw Data into Clinical Inferences: Phenotypes” Text to describe the relevant, specific covariates to the study and their derived parameters. To promote generalizability and comparison to other studies, please consider using MPOG Phenotyp
Country:
United Kingdom
Institution:
University of Birmingham
Related Authority:
Home Office
Note:
Related Authority
UK Visas and Immigration (UKVI)
Document Type:
Administrative form
Purpose:
Assessment of study time limit and authorisation for representation
Visa Category:
Student Route visa
Study Levels Referenced:
RQF Level 6, RQF Level 7, RQF Level 8
Applicable Age Threshold:
From 18 years old
Required Information:
Personal details, visa history, study history, authorisation details
Signatures Required:
Student signature
Intended Audience:
International students applying for CAS
Year:
2023
Region / city:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Abortion law, neonatal care
Document type:
Statement
Organization:
British Association of Perinatal Medicine (BAPM)
Author:
British Association of Perinatal Medicine (BAPM)
Target audience:
Medical professionals, policymakers
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Montana
Subject:
Local Government Compliance
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
Department of Administration
Author:
Director of the Department of Administration
Target Audience:
Legislature
Period of Effectiveness:
Fiscal year ended June 30, 2024
Approval Date:
August 27, 2025
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
Context:
Report on the compliance of local government entities with state regulations regarding local charge for services funds and fund balance limits, based on audits of fiscal year 2024.
Year:
2021
Organization:
BH
Plan Name:
BH 401(k) Plan (401(k))
Related Plan:
SRP
Subject:
Retirement plan contributions and IRS compensation limit
Document Type:
Explanatory financial plan examples
Regulatory Reference:
IRS compensation limit of $290,000
Contribution Types:
Pre-tax, Roth, Matching contributions, Automatic base contributions, Basic contributions
Compensation Types:
Base salary, Bonus
Audience:
Employees eligible for BH 401(k) Plan and SRP
Contribution Rate Reference:
5% employee contribution; 5% matching; 4% automatic base; 9% total company contribution
Note:
Year
Organization / Institution:
CERN
Author:
A. Grudiev, W. Wuensch