№ lp_1_2_02980
File format: docx
Character count: 178060
File size: 1399 KB
The document is a technical guide for implementing a Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) in the Judicial Information System (JIS), outlining the integration of business processes, service definitions, and system components to ensure smooth and secure functionality.
Year:
2018
Region / city:
Podgorica
Theme:
Judicial Information System, Service Oriented Architecture, Business Process Integration
Document type:
Technical documentation
Organization / institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Not specified
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2024
Event date:
23 October 2024
Event type:
Judicial training event
Subject matter:
Transparency in family court proceedings
Legal framework referenced:
Administration of Justice Act 1960; Children Act 1989; Family Procedure Rules 2010
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Court context:
Family Court and High Court (Family Division)
Author / speaker:
His Honour Judge Talbott
Organising body:
Sussex Family Justice Board
Intended audience:
Judges, advocates, legal professionals, journalists and legal bloggers
Document type:
Training presentation and guidance notes
Related initiatives:
Family Court Transparency Pilot
Includes annex:
Template Transparency Order
Judicial guidance cited:
Practice Guidance on Publication of Judgments (19 June 2024)
Case law referenced:
Griffiths v Tickle [2021] EWCA Civ 1882; Tickle v Herefordshire CC [2022] EWHC 1017; Hannah Summers & Anor v White & Ors [2024] EWFC 182
Publication date:
September 2022
Legislation:
Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022
Document type:
FAQ
Issuing authority:
Ministry of Justice and Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service
Target audience:
Youth Offending Teams (YOTs)
Related guidance:
Youth Justice Board Case Management Guidance
Scope:
Custodial sentencing, detention orders, community sentencing, electronic monitoring, youth rehabilitation orders
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Year:
2022
Region / City:
England and Wales, Birmingham, Bristol, Cardiff, Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester, Newcastle
Topic:
Legal Practice Direction, Disclosure
Document Type:
Practice Direction
Authority / Institution:
Business and Property Courts
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, Court personnel
Period of validity:
From 1 October 2022
Approval Date:
1 October 2022
Date of last modification:
Not specified
Year:
N/A
Region / City:
Singapore
Theme:
Divorce, Family Law
Document Type:
Legal Form
Agency / Organization:
Family Justice Courts of the Republic of Singapore
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Defendants in divorce cases
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Ontario
Topic:
Judicial conduct
Document Type:
Legal Decision
Organization / Institution:
Ontario Judicial Council
Author:
Ontario Judicial Council
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, judicial members, and the public
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Context description:
This is a legal decision regarding the judicial conduct of Justice Donald McLeod, following a complaint to the Ontario Judicial Council concerning his involvement with the Federation of Black Canadians.
Case No:
[…]
Year:
2020
Region / City:
England and Wales
Subject:
Remote hearings in court proceedings
Document type:
Legal order
Author:
[Court]
Target audience:
Legal professionals, court participants
Period of validity:
Until further notice
Date of approval:
[date of order]
Date of amendments:
[if applicable]
Year:
2012
Region / City:
Queensland
Subject:
Domestic and Family Violence Protection
Document Type:
Legal Request Form
Organization:
Queensland Courts
Author:
Queensland Department of Justice and Attorney-General
Target Audience:
Authorized representatives of prescribed entities, specialist DFV service providers, and support services
Period of Effect:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Eighth Circuit, United States
Topic:
Legal, Jury Instructions
Document Type:
Manual
Organization:
Committee on Model Jury Instructions for the District Courts of the Eighth Circuit
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, judges, jurors in the Eighth Circuit
Effective Period:
Reflecting changes made through July 30, 2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
July 30, 2025
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Eighth Circuit
Theme:
Criminal Jury Instructions
Document Type:
Manual
Organization / Institution:
Judicial Committee on Model Jury Instructions for the Eighth Circuit
Author:
Judicial Committee on Model Jury Instructions
Target Audience:
Judges, Lawyers
Period of Validity:
2025 Edition
Approval Date:
July 30, 2025
Date of Changes:
July 30, 2025
Year:
2023
Region:
Richmond area; Hanover County, Virginia
Geographic scope:
City of Richmond and Hanover County
Subject matter:
Court administration; local court practices; professional conduct
Document type:
Committee report; interview summary
Issuing body:
Administration of Justice Committee
Related organizations:
Richmond Bar Association
Courts referenced:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division; Hanover Circuit Court; Hanover General District Court; Hanover Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court
Judges referenced:
J. Overton Harris; Hugh S. Campbell; David B. Caddell; Frank G. Uvanni
Intended audience:
Attorneys and members of the local bar
Time period covered:
Annual interviews conducted in 2023
Topics addressed:
Local rules and forms; continuances; scheduling practices; courtroom decorum; remote hearings; professional development; guardian ad litem practice
Note:
Year
Description:
A form for requesting a CCT Friend to provide support during legal proceedings.
Year:
2014
Region / City:
California
Topic:
Tax forms
Document Type:
Form
Organization / Institution:
Judicial Council of California
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Vendors doing business with the Judicial Council of California
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
England, Wales, Scotland
Subject:
Language interpreter and translation services in courts and tribunals
Document type:
Statistical publication
Organization:
Ministry of Justice
Author:
Ministry of Justice
Target audience:
Courts, tribunals, legal professionals, public sector organizations
Period of validity:
31 October 2016 onwards
Date of approval:
31 October 2016
Date of amendments:
27 March 2025
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Northern Ireland, Scotland
Topic:
Legal reform, Court proceedings
Document type:
Consultation paper
Organization / institution:
Department of Justice
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Court users, people working within the justice system, media, community and voluntary sector organizations, and those interested in promoting open justice
Period of validity:
2025-2025
Approval date:
20 May 2025
Date of amendments:
None
Year:
2025
Region / City:
India
Theme:
Justice System, Gender Representation, Police, Judiciary, Prisons, Legal Aid
Document Type:
Report
Author:
Tata Trusts
Target Audience:
Policymakers, Legal Professionals, Researchers
Period of Validity:
2025
Approval Date:
15 April 2025
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Nairobi
Theme:
Judicial review, public procurement
Document type:
Judgment
Organization / Institution:
High Court of Kenya
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Legal professionals, government procurement officials, and entities involved in public tenders
Effective period:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
Not specified
Year:
2020
Region / city:
Kingman County, Kansas
Theme:
Property auction
Document type:
Court notice
Organization / institution:
Kingman County District Court
Author:
Randy L. Hill, Sheriff of Kingman County
Target audience:
Public, potential bidders
Effective period:
July 13, 2020
Approval date:
June 11, 2020
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Jurisdiction:
California, United States
Document Type:
Contractual Attachments / Bid Submission Forms
Related Laws:
California Public Contract Code (PCC) Sections 10365.5, 10410, 10411, 10476, 10477, 10478, 10490; Government Code Sections 1090 et seq., 87100 et seq.; California Rules of Court 10.103, 10.104
Organization:
Judicial Council of California
Purpose:
Submission of proposals, certifications, and acceptance of contract terms
Attachments Included:
3 – Proposer’s Acceptance, 4 – Darfur Contracting Act Certification, 5 – General Certifications Form, 6 – Technical & Cost Proposal Submission Form
Target Audience:
Contractors and firms bidding on Judicial Council contracts
Dates of Program/Proposal:
November 15 – 20, 2026; November 29 – December 4, 2026
Document type:
Administrative form
Issuing body:
Judicial Council of California
Related institutions:
Superior Courts of California
Purpose:
Collection of payee identification and tax information for payment processing
Jurisdiction:
California, United States
Applicable law:
California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 18646; Internal Revenue Code Section 6109(a)
Intended users:
Vendors and payees receiving payments
Tax reporting:
Form 1099
Residency classification:
California resident or nonresident
Form status:
Updated 08/26/2014
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Geneva
Subject:
Judicial Independence
Document Type:
Statement
Author:
Margaret Satterthwaite
Target Audience:
General public, legal professionals
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Last Modification:
Not specified