№ files_lp_4_process_1_50533
File format: docx
Character count: 2013
File size: 38 KB
This document provides the instructions and guidelines for nominating teachers for the Break the Mold Award in Boone County.
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Boone County
Topic:
Education
Document Type:
Instructions
Organization / Institution:
Boone County School District
Author:
Kathy Ruetman, Barbara Brady
Target Audience:
Teachers in Boone County School District
Period of Validity:
Indefinite
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Global
Subject:
Mold Design and Specifications
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Tooling Engineers, Mold Builders, Manufacturers
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Last Revision:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Building Materials / Gypsum Board
Document Type:
Product Specification
Organization / Institution:
United States Gypsum Company (USG)
Author:
USG Corporation
Target Audience:
Architects, Engineers, Contractors, Building Code Officials, Design Professionals
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Contextual Description:
A product specification detailing the properties, standards, and certifications of the USG Sheetrock® Brand Mold Tough® VHI Firecode® X Panels, a type of gypsum board.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Eastern USA, Western USA
Topic:
Building Materials, Sustainability
Document Type:
Product Specification
Organization / Institution:
USG Corporation
Author:
USG Corporation
Target Audience:
Architects, Engineers, Designers, Construction Professionals
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Manufacturer:
United States Gypsum Company (USG)
Product Name:
USG Sheetrock® Brand Mold Tough® Gypsum Liner Panels
UL Type Designation:
SLX
Section Number:
09 29 00
Product Type:
Moisture- and mold-resistant Type X gypsum shaftliner panel
Applicable Standards:
ASTM C1396, ASTM C840, ASTM C473, ASTM D3273, ASTM E84, ASTM E136, GA-216
Fire Classification:
Class A
Flame Spread:
20
Smoke Developed:
0
Thickness:
1 in. (25.4 mm)
Width:
2 ft. (610 mm)
Available Lengths:
8 ft. (2438 mm), 10 ft. (3048 mm), 12 ft. (3658 mm)
Weight:
4.0 lb./sq. ft. (19.5 kg/sq. m.)
Edge Type:
Double-beveled
Core Type:
Noncombustible, moisture- and mold-resistant gypsum core
Certifications:
UL Classified, GREENGUARD Gold (meets CA 01350)
Intended Use:
Shaft wall and area separation wall systems
Document Category:
Product specification and technical data sheet
Intended Audience:
Architects, engineers, design professionals, contractors, building code officials
Year:
2024
Date:
27 November 2024
Time:
6pm
Location:
Bailey Hill Centre, Mold (and via Video Conferencing)
Governing Body:
Mold Town Council
Document Type:
Council Meeting Minutes
Chair:
Councillor Brian Lloyd (Mayor and Chairman)
Deputy Mayor:
Councillor Paul Beacher
Clerk and Responsible Finance Officer:
Jo Lane
Officers Present:
Jane Evans, Events and Community Engagement Officer
Councillors Present:
Brian Lloyd, Paul Beacher, Robin Guest, Sarah Taylor, Chris Bithell, Haydn Jones, Pete Dando, Joanne Edwards, Teresa Carberry, Tina Claydon, Catherine Frances Claydon, Tim Maunders
Councillors Absent:
Haydn Bateman, Geoff Collett
Apologies Received From:
Bryan Grew, Megan Lloyd-Hughes
Agenda Items:
Apologies; Declarations of Interest; Mayor’s Announcements; Approval of Minutes; Action List; Officer Reports; Summer Playscheme 2025; Uniform Recycling Initiative; Winter Preparations; Dementia Friendly Community; Planning Decisions; Accounts and Payments
Financial Information:
Month 7 account balances and payment schedules approved
Key Resolutions:
Approval of previous minutes; continuation of store room hire for uniform recycling scheme; winter service nominations; representation on Dementia Friendly steering group; approval of payment schedules
Public Participation:
None
Note:
Year
Certification:
GREENGUARD Gold Certification, CA 01350 compliant
Product Dimensions:
1 in. (25.4 mm) thickness, various lengths
Product Weight:
4.0 lb./sq. ft. (19.5 kg/sq. m.)
Fire Resistance:
Meets ASTM E136, ASTM E84
Moisture Resistance:
Meets ASTM C1658, ASTM C3273
Warranty:
5 years manufacturing defects, 12-month limited exposure
Testing Compliance:
ASTM C473, ASTM D3273, ASTM C840
Design Basis:
USG Sheetrock® Brand Glass-Mat Liner Panels Mold Tough®
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Camp Mackall, North Carolina
Theme:
Mold Preventive Maintenance Services
Document Type:
Contract
Organization:
United States Government
Author:
Contractor
Target Audience:
Government contractors and facility maintenance personnel
Period of Effectiveness:
1 August 2020 – 31 July 2021, with option years
Approval Date:
1 August 2020
Modification Date:
Not specified
Description:
Professional services contract outlining mold preventive maintenance for various facilities at Camp Mackall, North Carolina, targeting mold mitigation in latrines, dining facility, laundry, and gym.
Product name:
My Mold Detective
Document type:
User guide / testing instructions
Topic:
Mold detection and indoor air quality testing
Testing methods:
Air sampling and tape lift surface sampling
Sampling locations:
Indoor rooms and outdoor control environment
Sampling duration:
5 minutes per air sample (75 liter air sample)
Laboratory analysis:
Third-party AIHA accredited laboratory
Laboratory turnaround time:
Three business days standard; one business day expedited
Laboratory fee:
$35 per sample; $15 additional for expedited analysis
Registration method:
Online registration via www.MyMoldDetective.com/Register
Data required for registration:
Sample serial numbers, property information, personal information
Result format:
Online laboratory report with interpretation
Result categories:
Normal, Slightly Elevated, Elevated
Notification method:
Email notification when report is available
Applicable environments:
Residential homes, apartments, condominiums, commercial properties
Comparison methodology:
Outdoor control sample compared with indoor air samples
Additional service:
Access to a network of Indoor Air Quality professionals
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Grand Rapids, MI
Topic:
Employment Testing, Physical Evaluation
Document Type:
Test Report
Organization:
The Center for Physical Rehabilitation - Cascade
Author:
Ken Follett, AT, ATC
Target Audience:
Employer, Health Professionals
Period of Validity:
May 30, 2019
Approval Date:
05/30/2019
Date of Last Modification:
05/30/2019
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
North Karanpura
Theme:
Price breakdown for construction and engineering services
Document Type:
Contract / Tender
Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Contractors and service providers in the construction and engineering field
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2007
Region / city:
England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales
Subject:
Adoption, Fostering, Health Assessment
Document type:
Health Report
Organization:
Agency responsible for adoption and fostering
Author:
Unknown
Target audience:
Prospective adoptive parents, foster carers, GP
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / city:
Manchester
Topic:
Property law, Lease disputes
Document type:
Judgment
Court / institution:
High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts in Manchester
Author:
Judge Hodge QC
Target audience:
Legal professionals, Property lawyers, Academics
Period of validity:
2021
Approval date:
1 April 2021
Date of changes:
None
Year:
2007
Region / city:
British Columbia
Topic:
Dam Safety, Flood Inundation, Consequence Classification
Document Type:
Guideline
Institution:
Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Dam safety officers, engineers, dam owners
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Year:
20XX
Keywords:
A; B; C; D; F
Type:
Review/Research Article
Corresponding Author:
[email protected]
Date Received:
XX Month 20XX
Date Accepted:
XX Month 20XX
Date Published:
XX Month 20XX
Institution:
Name of Institution, Country
Author 1:
Firstnames Lastname
Author 2:
Abcd E. Ghij
Author 3:
Klmn Opqr
Author 4:
Stuv Wx Yz4
References:
[1] Ogheneochuko Ubrurhe et al., "A Review of Energy Efficiency in Wireless Body Area/Sensor Networks", Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1 Jan 2020, DOI: 10.33166/AETiC.2020.01.001
Form number:
RHW25
Jurisdiction:
Wales
Country:
United Kingdom
Legislation:
Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016
Related legislation:
Housing (Wales) Act 2014; Housing Act 2004; Renting Homes (Fees etc.) (Wales) Act 2019
Document type:
Statutory notice form
Subject:
Termination of fixed term standard occupation contract under landlord’s break clause
Notice period:
Minimum two months
Parties:
Landlord; Contract-holder(s)
Property:
Dwelling subject to occupation contract
Grounds:
Exercise of landlord’s break clause under section 194(1)
Restrictions:
Sections 194, 196, 197, 198, 200 and 217 of the Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016
Court involvement:
Possession claim required if dwelling not vacated
Intended recipients:
Contract-holders of fixed term standard contracts with two-month minimum notice period
Note:
Year
Year:
2024-2025
Region / City:
Australia, New Zealand
Topic:
Promotion Terms and Conditions
Document Type:
Terms and Conditions
Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Australian and New Zealand residents aged 18+
Validity Period:
November 14, 2024 - March 28, 2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified