№ lp_2_3_66348
File format: docx
Character count: 16805
File size: 38 KB
This document is a legal decision concerning the admissibility of an application to the European Court of Human Rights, related to the sentence and conditions of release of the applicant, Brian Uttley, from imprisonment in the United Kingdom.
Year:
2005
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Legal case, Human rights
Document type:
Court decision
Institution:
European Court of Human Rights
Author:
European Court of Human Rights
Target audience:
Legal professionals, scholars, human rights organizations
Period of validity:
N/A
Date of approval:
29 November 2005
Date of amendments:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Date:
September 31, 2011
Jurisdiction:
Texas
Legal area:
Criminal evidence law
Topic:
Demonstrative evidence
Document type:
Legal memorandum
Author:
John Stride
Recipient:
Clay Abbott
Subject:
Use of recorded HGN tests in jury trials
Relevant courts:
Texas intermediate courts of appeals
Cases discussed:
Thrasher v. State; Hartsock v. State; Redfearn v. State
Evidence format:
Video, DVD, CD recordings
Procedural posture:
Appellate review
Time period covered:
2010–2011
Year:
2001
Region / City:
Strasbourg
Subject:
Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights
Document Type:
Court Decision
Institution:
European Court of Human Rights
Author:
L. Wildhaber, E. Palm, C.L. Rozakis, G. Ress, J.-P. Costa, G. Jörundsson, L. Caflisch, P. Kūris, I. Cabral Barreto, R. Türmen, V. Strážnická, C. Bîrsan, J. Casadevall, J. Hedigan, W. Thomassen, A.B. Baka, K. Traja
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, human rights experts
Effective Period:
1999-2001
Approval Date:
12 December 2001
Modification Date:
None
Year:
1997
Region / City:
Ireland
Subject:
Human Rights, Legal Proceedings, Abortion Laws
Document Type:
Court Decision
Institution:
European Commission of Human Rights
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, Human Rights organizations
Period of Validity:
N/A
Date of Approval:
9 April 1997
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Jurisdiction:
State of Arizona
Statute Number:
13-3989.02
Legal Field:
Criminal Procedure and Evidence
Document Type:
Statutory Provision
Governing Body:
Arizona Legislature
Subject:
Admissibility and authentication of public safety radio traffic records and recordings
Referenced Rules:
Arizona Rules of Evidence Rule 901(b)(10)
Related Statute:
Section 122292
Scope:
Public safety answering point communications facilities
Definitions:
“Records and recordings” including radio calls, data compilations, copies, and explanatory materials
Year:
2008
Region / City:
Berlin, Germany
Subject:
Admissibility of application
Document type:
Court decision
Institution:
European Court of Human Rights
Author:
European Court of Human Rights
Target audience:
Legal professionals, scholars, and individuals interested in European human rights law
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
8 January 2008
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
2009
Region / City:
Strasbourg
Theme:
Human Rights, Bereavement Benefits, Same-Sex Partnership
Document Type:
Court Decision
Institution:
European Court of Human Rights
Author:
European Court of Human Rights
Target Audience:
Legal Professionals, Human Rights Advocates
Period of Application:
2001-2009
Approval Date:
23 June 2009
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2010
Region / City:
Europe
Subject:
Human Rights, Missing Persons
Document Type:
Court Decision
Organ / Institution:
European Court of Human Rights
Author:
European Court of Human Rights
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, Human Rights organizations, Policy makers
Period of Validity:
Not applicable
Approval Date:
1 June 2010
Date of Changes:
Not applicable
Year:
2004
Region / City:
Penza, Russia
Topic:
Human rights, legal case
Document type:
Court decision
Organization / Institution:
European Court of Human Rights
Author:
European Court of Human Rights
Target audience:
Legal professionals, researchers, individuals interested in human rights law
Period of validity:
2004
Approval date:
13 May 2004
Modification date:
N/A
Year:
2004
Region / City:
Penza, Russia
Subject:
Civil defamation, Media freedom
Document Type:
Legal decision
Author:
European Court of Human Rights
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, scholars, human rights organizations
Period of Action:
Ongoing legal proceedings
Date of Approval:
13 May 2004
Date of Modifications:
None
Field of law:
Law of Evidence
Jurisdiction:
South Africa
Legal framework:
Criminal Procedure Act; Civil Proceedings Evidence Act; Constitution of the Republic of South Africa
Key constitutional provisions:
Section 35(1); Section 35(2); Section 35(3); Section 36
Subject matter:
Admissibility and relevance of evidence
Core concepts:
Proof; Evidence; Evidentiary material; Relevance; Admissibility
Sources of law:
Historical sources; English law; Legislation; Court cases
Incorporation of foreign law:
Direct incorporation; Indirect incorporation (residuary clauses)
Reference date for incorporated law:
30 May 1961
Type of proceedings addressed:
Criminal proceedings; Civil proceedings involving the state; Civil proceedings
Notable case discussed:
Shabalala
Related case:
Trupedo
Key issues examined:
Tracking dog evidence; Hearsay; Probative value; Distinction between weight and admissibility
Intended audience:
Law students and legal practitioners
Jurisdiction:
United States
Legal Framework:
Federal Rules of Evidence
Subject:
Admissibility of Evidence in Jury Trials
Document Type:
Educational outline and doctrinal summary
Primary Focus:
Relevance, prejudice, hearsay, character evidence, witness examination, authentication, and best evidence rule
Referenced Provisions:
FRE 104, 401–415, 501, 601–611, 701–706, 801–807, 901–902, 1001–1007
Constitutional Reference:
Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause
Key Case Referenced:
US v. Tanner
Intended Audience:
Law students preparing for examinations
Structure:
Topical outline with objection chart and explanatory notes
Year:
2008
Region / City:
Czech Republic
Topic:
Legal Decision
Document Type:
Court Decision
Institution:
European Court of Human Rights
Author:
European Court of Human Rights Judges
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, individuals involved in human rights law
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
12 February 2008
Amendment Date:
None
Year:
2011
Region / City:
Cyprus
Theme:
Human rights, Law
Document Type:
Legal Decision
Institution:
European Court of Human Rights
Author:
European Court of Human Rights
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, Scholars, Human Rights advocates
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
21 June 2011
Amendment Date:
N/A
Contextual description:
Legal decision from the European Court of Human Rights regarding the admissibility of a human rights application by Panayiotis Agapiou Kafkaris against Cyprus, focusing on his detention and the legal quality of his life sentence.
Year:
2010
Court:
European Court of Human Rights, Fifth Section
Application number:
37142/07
Applicant:
Gesine Mielke
Respondent State:
Germany
Date of decision:
9 March 2010
Place of origin of case:
Berlin, Germany
Subject matter:
Expropriation of property in the former German Democratic Republic and subsequent restitution proceedings
Legal context:
Property Act (Gesetz zur Regelung offener Vermögensfragen), Act on the Allocation of Former Public Property
Historical context:
Dissolution of the German Democratic Republic and German reunification (1989–1990)
Type of document:
Judicial decision on admissibility
Section Registrar:
Claudia Westerdiek
Chamber President:
Peer Lorenzen
Year:
2003
Region / City:
Romania
Topic:
Human Rights, Roma Minority, Violent Incident, Court Decision
Document Type:
Legal Decision
Institution:
European Court of Human Rights
Author:
European Court of Human Rights
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, human rights advocates, researchers in the field of minority rights
Period of Validity:
N/A
Date of Adoption:
3 June 2003
Date of Changes:
N/A