№ lp_1_2_21867
File format: docx
Character count: 29742
File size: 586 KB
This document provides a summary of key principles and case examples related to the formation of contracts, focusing on offer, acceptance, and the intention to create legal relations.
Year:
1918-1919
Region / City:
Canada, United Kingdom
Subject:
Contract Law, Legal Relations, Offer and Acceptance
Document Type:
Legal Case Summary
Organization / Institution:
None specified
Author:
None specified
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, law students
Effective Period:
Not specified
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2021
Region / City:
European Union
Topic:
Cross-border marketing of EU AIFs
Document type:
Notification letter
Author:
European Commission
Target audience:
AIFMs, regulatory bodies, financial institutions
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Elmira, Chemung County
Topic:
Aviation Infrastructure
Document Type:
Public Notice
Agency / Organization:
Chemung County
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
General Public, Aviation Industry Stakeholders
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Organization / Institution:
AFL Victoria
Target Audience:
Affiliate Clubs, Club Representatives
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Intention Economy, Large Language Models, AI Ethics, Persuasive Technology
Document Type:
Article
Author:
Yaqub Chaudhary, Jonnie Penn
Target Audience:
Tech industry professionals, researchers in AI and ethics, policymakers
Period of Action:
2020s
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Region / City:
United States of America
Subject:
Trademark Law
Document Type:
Legal Declaration
Organization / Institution:
United States Patent and Trademark Office
Target Audience:
Individuals or entities submitting international trademark applications to the United States
Year:
1997
Region / City:
Victoria, Australia
Subject:
Residential Tenancies
Document Type:
Notice
Authority:
Consumer Affairs Victoria
Target Audience:
Renters in Victoria
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Education, Home Education
Document Type:
Form
Organization / Institution:
Shropshire Council
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Parents / Guardians of children registered at maintained or independent schools
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
Contextual Description:
A form for parents to notify a school about their intention to deregister their child for elective home education.
Year:
2020
Region / city:
Sydney, Australia
Topic:
Insurance, Legal Notice
Document type:
Legal notice
Organization:
Federal Court of Australia, Great Lakes Insurance SE, Gordian RunOff Ltd
Author:
Great Lakes Insurance SE
Target audience:
Affected policyholders
Effective period:
Not specified
Approval date:
26 June 2020
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2011
Jurisdiction:
European Union
Legal Basis:
Directive 2011/61/EU, Article 33(2) and Article 33(3)
Subject:
Cross-border management of alternative investment funds and establishment of branches
Document Type:
Regulatory notification form
Issuing Framework:
Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
Addressee:
Competent authority of the AIFM home Member State
Applicant:
EU Alternative Investment Fund Manager (AIFM)
Scope:
Management of EU AIFs in host Member States or establishment of a branch
Referenced Legislation:
Directive (EU) 2016/2341
Structure:
Part 1 (Information on the AIFM); Part 2 (Freedom to provide services); Part 3 (Establishment of a branch)
Required Information:
Identification data, programme of operations, information on AIFs, branch details, delegation arrangements, master-feeder structures
Country:
England
Scheme:
Right to Acquire
Form code:
RTA1
Document type:
Statutory notice form
Subject:
Notice of intention to purchase social housing property
Eligible applicants:
Assured or secure tenants of Registered Providers
Administering bodies mentioned:
Homes England; Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Sections:
Property details; Tenant details; Family members; Income details; Qualification period; Previous discount; Tenants’ improvements; Signatures
Legal warning:
False information may lead to prosecution
Data use:
Fraud prevention and statistical surveys
Related schemes:
Right to Buy; Preserved Right to Buy
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Dover, United Kingdom
Topic:
Electronic Communications
Document Type:
Notice
Authority / Institution:
Dover District Council
Author:
Michael Tayler
Target Audience:
Local Planning Authority
Period of Action:
28 days from receipt of this letter
Date of Approval:
26/03/2025
Date of Changes:
N/A
Context Description:
A notice regarding the intention to install broadband apparatus near 14 Mill Road, Wingham, in compliance with the Electronic Communications Code and relevant Planning Acts.
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Torts (Interference with Goods) Act, Uncollected Items
Document Type:
Legal Notice
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Customers
Effective Period:
3 months from the notice date
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Theme:
History
Document Type:
Educational Text
Target Audience:
Students
Year:
2026
Region / City:
San Antonio, Texas
Theme:
Retinoblastoma, Fundraising, Medical Conferences
Document Type:
Crowdfunding Page Template
Organization:
WE C Hope USA
Author:
Marissa Gonzalez, Abby White
Target Audience:
Parents, Survivors, Medical Professionals, Supporters
Period of Action:
September 2026
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Document type:
Guidance document
Subject area:
Clinical research compliance
Topic:
Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA)
Applicable field:
Clinical trials
Responsible parties:
Sponsor, monitor, site personnel, principal investigator
Regulatory body referenced:
Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Key components:
Root cause analysis, corrective action, preventive action, follow-up evaluation
Authorship requirements:
Responsible individual or organization
Approval requirements:
Author signature, IRB review
Record retention:
Site regulatory file
Intended use:
Documentation of discrepancies and corrective measures in clinical research
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Middlesex University
Topic:
Research Ethics, Online Survey Tools
Document Type:
Guide
Institution:
Middlesex University
Author:
Middlesex University
Target Audience:
Staff and Students
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
August 2024
Date of Revisions:
August 2024
Year:
2025
Note:
Region / City
Theme:
Business Software / Presentation Software
Document Type:
Lesson Plan
Author:
Glenda Liddell-White
Target Audience:
Students
Period of Validity:
April 14 – 18, 2025
Contextual Description:
A lesson plan for teaching students how to create and manage professional presentations using Microsoft PowerPoint.