№ lp_1_2_48998
File format: docx
Character count: 2360
File size: 487 KB
Instructional guidance issued by a U.S. state agency describing procedures for account registration, document access, and common access issues related to shared electronic files.
Organization:
Wisconsin Department of Employee Trust Funds
Region:
Wisconsin
Topic:
Secure document access and account registration
Document type:
Instructional guide
Platform:
Box
Target audience:
External parties receiving electronic files from ETF
Contact information:
ETF customer service phone number 877-533-5020
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Document type:
Troubleshooting guide
Organization:
American Dental Association (ADA)
Target audience:
Membership service center staff and website users
Topics:
User authentication, access authorization, runtime errors, system administrator errors, firewall Port 88
Related systems:
ada.org, ada.org/godigital, CAQH, continuing education section
Issue scope:
Website access errors and user-side device problems
Procedures:
Steps for identifying error types and guiding users through fixes (login credentials, cache/cookie clearing, IT escalation)
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Troubleshooting, Connectivity, Patient Data Collection
Document Type:
Guide
Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Clinicians, Laboratory Staff
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Topic:
Troubleshooting, Software Errors
Document Type:
User Guide
Target Audience:
Users of AME Software
Year:
2009
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Network Security, Threat Management
Document Type:
White Paper
Organization / Institution:
Microsoft Corporation
Author:
Avi Ben-Menahem, Tanmay Ganacharya, Moshe Golan, Ziv Mador, Evgeney Ryzhyk, Tom Bolt, Jim Harrison, Adwait Joshi, Scott Lambert, Vladimir Lifliand, Duane Okamoto, Eli Pozniansky, Evgeny Skarbovsky, Jeff Williams
Target Audience:
IT Professionals, Network Administrators
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
2009
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Topic:
Troubleshooting, BFD, IPSEC
Document Type:
Technical Guide
Organization / Institution:
Cisco
Target Audience:
Network Engineers
Year:
2026
Author:
Karuna Jha
Organization:
Cisco
Document Type:
Technical report
Topic:
Mobile network authentication error
Target Audience:
Network engineers, telecom operators
System:
ASR5x00, SGSN, HLR
Protocols:
GSM, MAP, SS7
Issue:
SAI failures during UE attach
Data Collected:
Logs, session disconnect statistics, MAP statistics
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Networking, Routing
Document Type:
Technical Guide
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Network Engineers, System Administrators
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Context Description
Year:
2013
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Software Installation, Driver Installation, Troubleshooting
Document Type:
Installation Guide
Organization / Institution:
Moonlite
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Users of Moonlite controllers and focusers
Effective Period:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Institution:
Quinsigamond Community College
Service:
Microsoft Office 365 account access and authentication
Document type:
IT support instructions
Platform:
Microsoft Office 365
Target audience:
Students
Support contact:
IT Service Desk, 508-854-4427
Phone support availability:
24 x 7
On-site support location:
AB67, Administration Building
Regular support hours:
Monday–Friday 8am–5pm
Summer support hours:
Monday–Thursday 8am–5pm; Friday 8am–noon
Authentication methods:
Microsoft Authenticator app, phone, email, security questions
Related resources:
QCC Help website and Office 365 online help
Year:
2023
Note:
Region / City
Topic:
Technology, IT Support
Document Type:
Guide
Organization / Institution:
Dominion Energy
Target Audience:
Users of Dominion Energy’s QPTM and QQM systems
Date of Changes:
3.21.2023
Year:
2009
Applies to:
SQL Server 2008
Type of Document:
Technical Article / White Paper
Authors:
Sunil Agarwal, Boris Baryshnikov, Keith Elmore, Juergen Thomas, Kun Cheng, Burzin Patel
Technical Reviewers:
Jerome Halmans, Fabricio Voznika, George Reynya
Publisher:
Microsoft Corporation
Publication Date:
March 2009
Topics:
Database performance, SQL Server troubleshooting, resource bottlenecks, memory and I/O optimization, tempdb management, query performance
Intended Audience:
Database administrators, IT professionals
Tools Covered:
SQL Server Profiler, Performance Monitor, Dynamic Management Views, Extended Events, Data Collector
Year:
2021
Department:
International Relations
Author:
ENAYABA DIVINE
Assignment:
Discuss scenarios where troubleshooting skills were effectively applied
Audience:
Students, IT professionals, Business managers
Date of submission:
2021
Year:
2019
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
Veteran Health Identification Card Application
Document Type:
User Guide
Organization / Institution:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Information and Technology (OI&T)
Author:
REDACTED
Target Audience:
Veterans, Administrative Users, Technical Administrators
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Revision History:
Various revisions from 2015 to 2019
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Technical Support / Software Error
Document Type:
Troubleshooting Guide
Organization / Institution:
Blue Prism
Author:
Blue Prism Development Team
Target Audience:
Blue Prism Users
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Troubleshooting, Software
Document Type:
Troubleshooting Guide
Organization:
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Support staff, Field Operations, Enterprise Applications Management, Development team
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Multiple dates listed (see revision history)
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Clinical Study Documentation
Document Type:
Instructional Template
Institution / Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Study Teams, Clinical Researchers
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Maine
Topic:
Politics, Healthcare, Social Security, Abortion
Document Type:
Political Ad/Press Release
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Voters, Political Constituents, General Public
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A