№ files_lp_4_process_3_128934
File format: docx
Character count: 986
File size: 45 KB
Court order determining whether the plaintiff may proceed without paying filing or service fees according to state poverty guidelines.
Year:
20__
Region / City:
South Carolina, ______ Judicial Circuit
Type of Document:
Court Order
Court / Institution:
South Carolina State Court
Case Number:
_____________________
Parties:
Plaintiff: _____________________, Defendant: _____________________
Legal Reference:
Ex parte Martin, 321 S.C. 533, 471 S.E.2d 134 (1995); Rule 3(b)(1), SCRCP
Filing Status:
In Forma Pauperis Request
Date Issued:
_____________________
Presiding Judge:
_____________________
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Jurisdiction:
Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania
Court:
Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County
Division:
Civil Division – Custody/Divorce
Document Type:
Court instruction packet and petition forms
Legal Subject:
In Forma Pauperis status for waiver of court costs
Applicable Case Types:
Custody and Divorce actions
Issuing Authority:
Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County
Related Organization:
Westmoreland County Bar Association
Date of Last Update:
March 9, 2016
Required Filing:
Petition and Verification for In Forma Pauperis
Associated Statute:
18 Pa. C.S. §4904
Date of Issuance:
6/28/2019
Decision Number:
19-06-022
Applications:
14-11-007, 14-11-009, 14-11-010, 14-11-011
Regulatory Body:
California Public Utilities Commission
Type of Document:
Regulatory Decision
Programs Covered:
Energy Savings Assistance (ESA), California Alternate Rates for Energy (CARE)
Program Years:
2015-2017, 2021-2026
Target Audience:
Investor-Owned Utilities, Low-Income Customers
Statutory References:
Public Utilities Code Section 2790(a), Section 382(e)
Petitions:
Public Advocates Office Petition for Modification (denied)
Funding Considerations:
Bridge funding for post-2020 program transition
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Symmes Township, Hamilton County, Ohio
Topic:
Zoning Resolution, Variance Request
Document Type:
Resolution
Author:
Symmes Township Board of Zoning Appeals
Target Audience:
Property Owners, Zoning Inspectors, Board of Zoning Appeals
Effective Period:
November 1, 2021
Date of Adoption:
November 1, 2021
Date of Denial:
September 13, 2021
Year:
2018
Region / City:
California
Subject:
Public Utilities Commission Decision
Document Type:
Order
Authority:
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
Author:
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
Target Audience:
Public Utilities Commission, Utility Workers Union of America
Period of Validity:
Indefinite
Approval Date:
April 26, 2018
Modification Date:
April 26, 2018
Document Number:
DA 24-373
Release Date:
April 22, 2024
Applicant:
Tahoma Preservation
Location:
Tacoma, Washington
Agency:
Federal Communications Commission
Bureau:
Media Bureau
Division:
Audio Division
Facility ID:
787979
Application File Number:
0000231404
Pleading File Number:
0000238844
Type of Document:
Order
Subject:
Petition for Reconsideration
Service:
Low Power FM (LPFM)
Relevant Rule Sections:
47 CFR §§ 73.807, 73.870
Related Legislation:
Local Community Radio Act of 2010
Decision:
Petition Denied
Signatory:
Albert Shuldiner
Title of Signatory:
Chief, Audio Division
Year:
2025
Region / City:
California
Subject:
Water Service Dispute
Document Type:
Legal Decision
Organization / Institution:
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Parties involved in the dispute, legal professionals
Period of Effect:
March 2022 - Present
Approval Date:
March 18, 2025
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2025
Date:
August 14, 2025
State:
California
Issuing Body:
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
Division:
Legal Division
Resolution Number:
L-624
Document Type:
Commission Resolution
Subject:
Public Records Act request PRA #25-35 and appeal by Seth Rosenfeld
Requestor:
Seth Rosenfeld
Relevant Law:
California Public Records Act; Government Code sections 7927.705, 7922.000, 1701, 1731 et seq.; Public Utilities Code sections 1731, 1756
Related Regulation:
General Order 66-D
Related Proceeding:
R.24-05-022
Related Decision:
D.25-05-006; D.25-01-005
Request Date:
January 16, 2025
Appeal Date:
March 11, 2025
Disposition:
Appeal denied; staff redactions and withholding affirmed
Scope of Records:
Studies, reports, summaries, memos, presentations, and records derived from annual reports of transportation network companies
Year:
2026
Jurisdiction:
California, United States
Subject:
Intrastate revenue requirement and rate design for Ducor Telephone Company
Document type:
Regulatory decision
Issuing authority:
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
Application number:
23-10-008
Related decision:
D.25-08-010
Relevant legislation:
Public Utilities Code §275.6
Entities involved:
Ducor Telephone Co., National Exchange Carrier Association, Eric N. Votaw, Jenifer Vellucci
Methodology:
Original cost methodology
Scope:
Test Year 2025
Purpose:
Approval and modification of GRC rate base and denial of rehearing
Year:
20__
Jurisdiction:
Miami-Dade County, Florida, United States
Document Type:
Court Order / Judicial Ruling
Division:
Probate Division, Eleventh Judicial Circuit
Case Number:
___________________________
Parties:
Petitioner, Respondent, Vulnerable Adult
Judge:
Circuit Court Judge
Filing Date:
_______________________
Hearing Date:
_______________________
Legal Basis:
Florida Statutes, section 655.0201
Subject:
Protective injunction, exploitation of vulnerable adult
Asset Considerations:
Temporary freezing of assets and credit lines, restitution measures
Enforcement:
Valid and enforceable in all Florida counties, law enforcement authorized under section 901.15(6)
Year:
2024
Jurisdiction:
State of California, United States
Subject:
Self-Generation Incentive Program, Demand Response Programs, Energy Storage Incentives
Document type:
Commission Decision
Issuing body:
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
Related proceedings:
Rulemaking 20-05-012; Decision D.24-03-071; Decision D.23-12-005; Decision D.16-09-056
Applicants:
Leapfrog Power, Inc.; CPower; Nostromo Energy, Inc.; Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Technologies; California Efficiency + Demand Management Council; OhmConnect, Inc.; QCells North America; Voltus, Inc.
Other parties:
Ava Community Energy Authority; Marin Clean Energy; Peninsula Clean Energy Authority; San Diego Community Power; Sonoma Clean Power Authority; City of San Jose; Cal Advocates
Key points:
Denial of rehearing application; clarification of SGIP DR program enrollment requirements; allocation of $280 million to Residential Solar and Storage Equity budget
Date of decision:
June 20, 2024
Effective period:
Until superseded by future Commission decisions
Legal basis:
Public Utilities Code section 1708; prior Commission precedents on qualified DR programs
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Washington, D.C.
Subject:
Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Telecommunications
Document Type:
Order
Organization / Institution:
Federal Communications Commission
Author:
Trent B. Harkrader, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau
Target Audience:
Telecommunications Carriers
Effective Period:
January 1, 2024 - Ongoing
Approval Date:
December 20, 2023
Modification Date:
None
Background:
Telecommunications, Cybersecurity
Compliance Requirements:
Cybersecurity risk management plan submission, NIST Framework compliance
Deadline:
January 2, 2024 or within 30 days of approval under PRA
Summary:
Regulatory decision related to cybersecurity and risk management plan deadlines for telecommunications carriers receiving Enhanced A-CAM support
Year:
2020
Region / City:
California
Topic:
Public Utilities
Document Type:
Decision
Authority / Institution:
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
Author:
Public Utilities Commission
Target Audience:
Stakeholders in energy transmission projects, public utilities
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
August 6, 2020
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / City:
California
Topic:
Utility Regulation
Document Type:
Commission Decision
Agency:
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
Author:
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
Target Audience:
Regulatory professionals, utility companies
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
February 11, 2021
Date of Changes:
None
Year:
2021
Region / City:
California
Topic:
Telecommunications, Federal Tax Law, California High Cost Fund A
Document Type:
Official Order
Organization / Institution:
California Public Utilities Commission
Author:
California Public Utilities Commission
Target Audience:
Telecommunications Companies, Regulatory Bodies
Effective Period:
December 14, 2018 – Present
Approval Date:
May 6, 2021
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Sacramento, California, United States
Subject:
Renewable energy regulation and Renewables Portfolio Standard compliance
Document Type:
Regulatory order
Institution:
California Public Utilities Commission
Proceeding:
Rulemaking 24-01-017
Related Decision:
Decision 24-12-035
Applicant for Rehearing:
Small Business Utility Advocates (SBUA)
Responding Parties:
San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E); Southern California Edison Company (SCE)
Program:
California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program
Legal References:
Public Utilities Code § 1732; California Code of Regulations, Title 20, § 16.1(c)
Date Issued:
February 5, 2026
Location of Issuance:
Sacramento, California
Signatories:
Alice Reynolds (President); Darcie L. Houck; John Reynolds; Karen Douglas; Matthew Baker (Commissioners)
Decision Outcome:
Application for rehearing denied
Status of Proceeding:
Rulemaking remains open
Year:
2026
Country:
United States
City / Region:
Oxnard, California
Subject:
Emergency Connectivity Fund reimbursement dispute and program rule compliance
Document Type:
Administrative order
Issuing Body:
Federal Communications Commission, Wireline Competition Bureau
Case / Application Number:
ECF202113179
Docket Number:
WC Docket No. 21-93
Applicant / Petitioner:
Child Development Resources of Ventura County, Inc.
Program:
Emergency Connectivity Fund (ECF)
Relevant Legislation:
American Rescue Plan Act of 2021
Adoption Date:
February 10, 2026
Release Date:
February 10, 2026
Decision:
Request for review and waiver denied
Related Organization:
Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC)
Key Issue:
Reimbursement request for more than 1,500 unused Wi-Fi hotspots and compliance with ECF eligibility and usage rules
Funding Amount Requested:
$375,484.98 for equipment and $83,060.60 for services
Affected Beneficiaries:
Pre-kindergarten students and staff in Head Start centers
Year:
2015
Region / City:
South Africa
Theme:
Civil Engineering, Construction Contracts
Document Type:
Guide, Pro Forma Forms
Organization:
South African Institution of Civil Engineering (SAICE)
Author:
South African Institution of Civil Engineering (SAICE)
Target Audience:
Contractors, Employers, Engineers
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
July 2018
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2019
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Subject:
Anti-money laundering compliance
Document Type:
Guidance
Author:
CIOT, ATT
Target Audience:
Small firms registered for AML Supervision with CIOT or ATT
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
8 April 2019
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2026
Note:
Region / city
Topic:
Project Management, Business Cases
Document Type:
Template
Note:
Year
Context:
A business case template based on HM Treasury Better Business Cases guidance following the Five Case Model for preparing business cases, used for evaluating expenditure proposals and their strategic, economic, and financial implications.