№ files_lp_4_process_3_100790
File format: docx
Character count: 8388
File size: 50 KB
Meeting minutes of the GRPE Fuel and Energy Source and Charging Task Force drafting group discussing procedures and key performance indicators for determining electric vehicle fast-charging performance based on usable battery energy measurements and ISO 12906 methodology.
Date:
2 February 2026
Time:
16:00–18:00 (CET)
Location:
Online meeting (Teams)
Type of document:
Meeting minutes
Meeting format:
Drafting meeting
Working group:
GRPE F&SC TF (Fuel and Energy Source and Charging Task Force)
Agenda reference:
FPCP-11-01e
Previous meeting reference:
FRPC-10-02e
Participants:
List undisclosed
Organizations mentioned:
OICA; JRC; UTAC
Subject:
Charging performance determination procedure and KPIs for fast charging
Technical references:
ISO 12906; WLTP test cycle
Main topics discussed:
Definition of charging performance KPIs; determination of usable battery energy window; reproducibility of fast-charging tests; methodology based on Coulomb counting; testing procedures for electric vehicle battery charging
Key proposals discussed:
OICA proposal for determining charging time for a window corresponding to 70% of usable battery energy starting from 10% UBE condition
Related activities:
Testing campaign results presentation and methodological discussion
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Geneva
Topic:
Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE), Battery Durability for Electrified Heavy Duty Vehicles
Document Type:
Informal Working Document
Organ / Institution:
United Nations, Economic Commission for Europe, World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations
Author:
Informal Working Group on Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE)
Target Audience:
Parties involved in vehicle regulation, manufacturers, environmental experts
Period of Validity:
2025-2026
Approval Date:
2025
Date of Changes:
2025
Year:
2025-2026
Region / City:
Geneva
Topic:
Electric Vehicles and the Environment
Document Type:
Informal Working Document
Body/Institution:
Economic Commission for Europe
Author:
Informal Working Group on Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE)
Target Audience:
Experts and stakeholders in the field of electric vehicle regulations
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
March 2025
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Geneva
Subject:
Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE)
Document Type:
Informal Working Document
Organization:
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE)
Author:
Informal Working Group on Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE)
Target Audience:
Experts and stakeholders in the field of electrified vehicles and environmental regulation
Period of Validity:
2025–2026
Approval Date:
January 2025
Date of Changes:
March 2025–2026
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Geneva
Topic:
Electric Vehicles, Environmental Impact, Battery Durability
Document Type:
Informal Working Document
Organization:
Economic Commission for Europe, Inland Transport Committee
Author:
Informal Working Group on Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE)
Target Audience:
Policy makers, stakeholders in vehicle regulation, and environmental experts
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Last Revision:
2025
Context:
This document presents updates and proposals for regulations concerning battery durability in heavy-duty electrified vehicles. It was prepared by the Informal Working Group on Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE) in the context of the United Nations Global Technical Regulation.
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Geneva
Topic:
Electric Vehicles, Battery Durability, Heavy Duty Vehicles
Document Type:
Informal Document
Organization / Institution:
United Nations, Economic Commission for Europe
Author:
Informal Working Group on Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE)
Target Audience:
Governments, regulators, and manufacturers involved in vehicle regulations
Period of validity:
2025-2026
Approval Date:
13 January 2025
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Geneva
Topic:
Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE), Battery Durability
Document Type:
Informal Document
Organization / Institution:
Economic Commission for Europe, World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations, Working Party on Pollution and Energy
Author:
Informal Working Group on Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE)
Target Audience:
Regulatory bodies, vehicle manufacturers, environmental agencies
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2013
Region / City:
Europe
Topic:
Retrofit emissions control systems for vehicles
Document type:
Draft regulation comments
Author:
Environmental Industries Commission (EIC)
Target audience:
Industry stakeholders, government bodies
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
February 2013
Modification date:
N/A
Note:
Date
Tuesday, 25th October 2016:
14:00 – 18:00 CET (Draft group meeting)
Wednesday, 26th October 2016:
9:30 – 17:00 CET (VIAQ IWG meeting)
3.1 Task from 5th meeting:
Comments on test temperature ambient mode 23° or 25°C (all)
3.2 Task from 5th meeting:
Korea opinion to refer to vehicle category 1-1 (Korea)
4.1 Task from 5th meeting:
Comments to draft document (all)
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Geneva
Organization:
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE)
Body:
World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29)
Working Party:
Working Party on Pollution and Energy (GRPE)
Session:
Ninety-fourth session
Agenda Item:
Item 5 – UN Regulations Nos. 24, 85, 115, 133, 143 and 177
Document Code:
ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2026/XX
Type of Document:
Regulatory amendment proposal
Regulation Concerned:
UN Regulation No. 85
Submitting Body:
Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulations Screening (AVRS)
Related Framework:
1958 Agreement and Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3.)
Subject:
Integration of vehicles equipped with Automated Driving Systems into the scope of Regulation No. 85
Proposed Change:
Update of references to R.E.3 and associated footnotes to reflect categories X and Y vehicles introduced in Revision 8
Language:
English
Distribution:
General
Date of Issue:
December 2025
Year:
2023
Region / City:
UNECE
Topic:
Electric Vehicles, Smart Charging
Document Type:
Terms of Reference
Organ / Institution:
UNECE
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Stakeholders in electric vehicle and energy sectors
Effective Period:
2025–2026
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Chain of Custody procedures
Document Type:
Guide
Organization / Institution:
Preferred by Nature
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Companies seeking FSC and PEFC certification
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Year:
2024
Region / City:
South Korea
Topic:
Financial services, banking
Document type:
Press release
Organization:
Financial Services Commission (FSC)
Author:
Financial Services Commission (FSC)
Target audience:
Financial industry professionals, regulatory bodies
Effective period:
From July 5, 2024
Approval date:
July 5, 2024
Changes date:
Not specified
Contact:
[email protected]
Description:
Press release from the Financial Services Commission announcing the identification of Domestic Systemically Important Banks (D-SIBs) and Domestic Systemically Important Financial Institutions (D-SIFIs) for 2024.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Grahamsville, New York, USA
Subject:
FSC Chain of Custody Audit
Document Type:
Internal Audit Report
Organization:
FSC Certification Body
Author:
FSC Auditor
Target Audience:
FSC-certified organizations, certification bodies
Audit Period:
2023
Approval Date:
2023-10-01
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2021
Country:
Canada
Topic:
Labour standards; labour rights compliance; certification requirements
Document type:
Self-assessment form
Organization:
Forest Stewardship Council Canada (FSC Canada)
Standard referenced:
FSC-STD-40-004 V3-1
Related conventions:
ILO Fundamental Conventions
Intended audience:
FSC Chain of Custody Certificate Holders and organizations seeking FSC certification in Canada
Purpose:
Demonstration of conformance with FSC Core Labour Requirements
Submission recipient:
Certification bodies conducting FSC audits
Effective deadline mentioned:
31 December 2022
Version:
1.0
Publication date:
15 December 2021
Contact:
[email protected]
Year:
Not specified
Country referenced:
South Africa
Subject:
Labour standards and employment practices
Document type:
Self-assessment form and compliance declaration
Standard framework:
FSC Core Labour Requirements
Related international standards:
ILO Conventions C029, C105, C100, C111, C138, C182
Organization:
FSC certificate holder organization
Department referenced:
Human Resources; Payroll/Finance
Author:
Not specified
Intended users:
FSC certificate holders
Key topics:
Child labour; Forced labour; Non-discrimination in employment
Compliance clauses referenced:
Clause 7.2; Clause 7.3; Clause 7.4
Supporting records:
Employment contracts, identity documents, payroll records, HR procedures, trade union meeting minutes, recruitment documentation
Policy references:
Company policy statements signed by management representative or director
Verification method:
Internal documentation review and employee records
Geographical compliance reference:
National labour laws and ILO conventions ratified by South Africa
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters