№ lp_2_1_30206
File format: docx Character count: 123579 File size: 147 KB
This document is a legal ruling addressing the constitutionality of a provision restricting freedom of expression, delivered by the Supreme Court of Zimbabwe.
Year: 2010
Region / city: Harare
Topic: Constitutional law, freedom of expression
Document type: Court ruling
Institution: Supreme Court of Zimbabwe
Author: Constantine Munyaradzi Chimakure, Vincent Kahiya
Target audience: Legal professionals, constitutional law scholars
Period of validity: 2010-2013
Date of approval: June 3, 2010, October 30, 2013
Date of amendments: N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.

Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?

You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:
  1. Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
  2. In the app, tap Send.
  3. Select network, paste our wallet address.
  4. Send the exact amount shown above.
After sending, paste your TXID (transaction ID) and your email to receive the download link. Need help? Contact support and we’ll guide you step by step.

The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Duties of Directors under the Companies Act of 1973 and Partial Codification in 2008
Year: 1973
Jurisdiction: South Africa
Document Type: Legal Case Study / Academic Study Unit
Legislation: Companies Act of 1973, partial codification in 2008
Sections Discussed: 75, 76, 77, 78
Case References: Robinson v Randfontein Estate Gold; Regal Hastings Ltd v Gulliver; Atlas Organic Fertilizers (Pty) Ltd v Pikkewyn Ghwano; Sibex Construction (SA) (Pty) Ltd v Injectaseal CC; Fisheries Development Corporation of SA v Jorgenson; Industrial Development Consultants Ltd v Cooley
Author: Academic / Legal Educator
Audience: Law students, legal practitioners
Legal Principles: Fiduciary duties, duty of care, business judgement rule, conflict of interest, statutory and common law provisions
Period of Application: 1973–present (with updates in 2008)
Divided Performance of Patented Methods in Australia: Analysis of Procured Infringement and Recommendations for Codification
Year: 2026
Region: Australia
Subject: Patent Law, Intellectual Property, Method Claims
Document Type: Academic Article
Institution: University / Legal Research Institute (implied)
Author: Johnathon E Liddicoat
Target Audience: Legal scholars, patent attorneys, policymakers
Legal Context: Patents Act 1990 (Cth), Australian patent law, US Supreme Court precedents (Akamai, McKesson)
Key Concepts: Divided performance, procured infringement, direct and indirect patent infringement
Case Studies: Akamai Technologies Inc v Limelight Networks Inc, McKesson Technology v Epic Systems
Recommendations: Codification of procured infringement in Australian patent law
Topics: 31aiii 923 Codification