№ lp_2_1_26738
File format: docx
Character count: 4797
File size: 16 KB
Note:
Year
Theme:
Immigration, American Dream
Document Type:
Narrative Essay
Context:
Personal narrative connecting immigration, personal experiences, and the American Dream.
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Note:
Year
Note:
Year
Author:
Brett MacFadden
Year:
1965 (historical reference); contemporary publication date not specified
Location referenced:
San Francisco; The Sea Ranch; California
Subject:
Supergraphics; large-scale wall graphics; collaborative mural design
Document type:
Educational project guide
Techniques described:
Use of colored masking tape for large-scale wall graphics
Materials:
Colored masking tape; rulers; straightedges; levels; Acto knives; foam core
Associated individuals:
Barbara Stauffacher Solomon; Frank Stella; Jan Van Der Ploeg
Institutional affiliation:
MacFadden & Thorpe; California College of the Arts
Author credentials:
Co-Founder and Creative Director; Senior faculty member; MFA from Cranbrook Academy of Art
Audience:
Students and workshop participants
Year:
2014
Region / City:
Utah
Topic:
Drug Use and Society
Document Type:
Reflection/Personal Essay
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Students/General Public
Period of Application:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Unknown
Date of Last Update:
Unknown
Year:
2020
Region / city:
Ireland
Topic:
Dementia, Disability Awareness, Advocacy
Document type:
Press Release
Organization:
The Alzheimer Society of Ireland
Author:
Sean Mackell
Target audience:
General Public, People with Dementia, Advocacy Groups
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Contextual description:
Press release marking UN International Day of Persons with Disabilities 2020, calling for support of people with dementia in contributing to society through advocacy groups.
Year:
2021
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Injury Prevention, Older Adults, Health Awareness
Document Type:
Campaign Toolkit
Organization:
CDC National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
Author:
CDC National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
Target Audience:
Older Adults (ages 65 and older), Caregivers
Period of Action:
May 2021 - September 2023
Date of Approval:
May 2021
Date of Updates:
September 2023
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
World Hunger, Technology, Solutions
Document Type:
Video
Author:
Science Unbound, TEDx Talks, Second Thought, Seeker, World Food Program USA, Quora, PA Consulting, Action Against Hunger, United Nations, World Vision, Wikipedia contributors
Target Audience:
General Public, Researchers, Policymakers
Period of Action:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
2023
Modification Date:
2024
Context:
A compilation of various sources discussing global hunger and technological innovations addressing hunger, providing insights into the potential solutions and ongoing efforts.
Year:
2012
Region / Country:
United States
Topic:
Media transition from print to digital, reading habits
Document Type:
Article / Research summary
Publisher / Organization:
Youngzine; Pew Internet and American Life Project
Author:
Sri Subramaniam; Lee Rainie, Kathryn Zickuhr, Kristen Purcell, Mary Madden, Joanna Brenner
Target Audience:
General public, educators, media analysts
Publication Date:
4 Nov 2012; 4 Apr 2012
Access Date:
20 Oct 2015
Format:
Web
Key Subjects:
Newsweek, Time, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, digital media, magazine subscriptions, online news consumption, demographic reading patterns
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Global
Subject:
Language, Writing, Citation
Document Type:
Educational Resource
Institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Writers, Students, Researchers
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Subject:
English 1
Assignment Type:
Literary Analysis Project
Text Studied:
“Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been”
Format:
Storybird Picture Book
Educational Level:
High School
Components:
Retelling and Analytical Essay
Focus:
Characterization, Conflict, Plot Sequence, Bildungsroman Analysis
Submission Method:
Email
Due Date:
Not specified
Assessment Type:
Summative Grades
Evaluation Criteria:
Main Idea; Analysis
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Chelston, Cockington & Livermead
Topic:
Community events and activities
Document Type:
Event guide
Organization / Institution:
Torbay Communities
Author:
Joey and Kelly, Community Builders
Target Audience:
Local residents
Event Period:
February 2026 - March 2026
Date of Approval:
February 2026
Date of Last Update:
February 26, 2026
Contact:
[email protected]
Social Media:
Facebook (for updates on local events)
Author:
Dr Clare Fernandes
Topic:
Physical activity during lockdown
Type of document:
Health and fitness guidance article
Context:
COVID-19 lockdown
Intended audience:
General public
Geographical relevance:
United Kingdom
Referenced organisations:
NHS, British Society of Exercise Medicine, Sport England, Nottingham University
Key subjects:
Exercise planning, goal setting, mental health, chronic conditions, online fitness resources
Health considerations:
Diabetes, hypertension, chronic depression, chronic anxiety, arthritis, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder
Format:
Structured advisory text with resource links
Year:
June 2025
Choreographer:
Lesley Stewart (SCO)
Music:
GO HOME W U - Keith Urban & Lainey Wilson
Level:
Beginner
Count:
32
Wall:
4
Target Audience:
Dance enthusiasts
Document Type:
Dance routine
Region / City:
International
Date Approved:
June 2025
Year:
2025
Region / City:
International
Theme:
Dance choreography
Document Type:
Dance steps guide
Organization:
N/A
Author:
Lesley Stewart
Target Audience:
Beginner dancers
Effective Period:
June 2025
Approval Date:
June 2025
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Environmental Education
Document Type:
Educational Worksheet
Organization / Institution:
School / Educational Platform
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students
Activity Period:
Single class session or unit
Submission Platform:
Padlet
Activity Options:
Poster, Crossword, Voki Avatar, ChatterPix, Podcast, Video
Resources / Tools:
PosterMyWall, Crossword Labs, Voki, ChatterPix, Powtoon
Version:
1.1
Review date:
12/04/2024
Edited by:
CW
Approved by:
CW
Year:
2024
Region / city:
Mandalay
Topic:
Healthcare, Patient Management
Document type:
Policy
Organ / institution:
Mandalay Medical Centre
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Employees of the organisation, including agency workers, locums, and contractors
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2009
Region / city:
Western Europe
Topic:
Electoral Systems, Proportional Representation, Political Parties
Document Type:
Academic Paper
Institution:
Stanford University
Author:
Jonathan Rodden
Target Audience:
Political Scientists, Academics
Period of Effect:
Late 19th to Early 20th Century
Approval Date:
2009
Date of Revisions:
December 30, 2009
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Chernobyl, Former Soviet Union
Subject:
Military Technology, Environmental Modification, Nuclear Disaster
Document Type:
Documentary, Report
Institution:
Kla.TV
Author:
Werner Altnickel
Target Audience:
General Public, Scholars of History and Military Technology
Period of Action:
1986, 1997, 2002
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
[Station/Post Office]
Subject:
Work hour limits, overtime
Document Type:
Grievance form
Organization / Institution:
[NALC]
Author:
[Union Representative]
Target Audience:
Union representatives, management
Period of validity:
[Date] through [Date]
Approval Date:
[Date]
Date of Changes:
[Date]