№ lp_2_3_09348
File format: docx
Character count: 8330
File size: 70 KB
Year:
2024
Region / City:
North Central Texas
Subject:
Fuel Gas Code Amendments
Document Type:
Amendments
Organization / Institution:
North Central Texas Council of Governments
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Code Officials, Contractors, Plumbers, and other stakeholders involved in fuel gas systems
Effective Period:
2024
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
2024
Contextual Description:
Amendments to the 2024 International Fuel Gas Code for the North Central Texas region detailing changes, exceptions, and clarifications to various sections regarding gas system installation, maintenance, and safety.
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2009
Region / City:
East Africa
Topic:
Regional integration, East African Community
Institution:
Aalborg University
Author:
Klaas B. J. Overlade
Target Audience:
Researchers, policymakers, academics
Period of Validity:
N/A
Date of Approval:
01-04-2009
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
[ENTER YEAR]
Region/City:
San Mateo County
Topic:
Contract Agreement, Consultant Services
Document Type:
Agreement
Organ/Institution:
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG)
Author:
[CONSULTANT NAME]
Target Audience:
C/CAG, Consultant, Project Managers
Period of Validity:
[DATE] to [DATE]
Approval Date:
[ENTER DATE]
Amendment Date:
[DATE]
Context:
Agreement between C/CAG and a consultant to provide services for the evaluation of salary ranges and total compensation structure, including detailed terms and conditions regarding payment, performance, and termination.
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Queensland
Subject:
Domestic and family violence reforms
Document type:
Government report
Organization / institution:
Queensland Government
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Non-government stakeholders, government officials
Period of validity:
2023-2025
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Jurisdiction:
United States
Agency:
Department of Justice
Office:
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Adjudicatory body:
Board of Immigration Appeals
Case type:
Removal proceedings
Document type:
Legal memorandum
Procedural posture:
Opposition to government appeal
Subject matter:
Immigration detention and bond determination
Standard of review:
Clearly erroneous and de novo
Parties:
Respondent and Department of Homeland Security
Legal issues:
Dangerousness, flight risk, burden of proof
Cited authorities:
8 C.F.R. § 1003.1; federal appellate case law
Purpose:
Challenge to appeal of bond grant
Year:
2015–2016
Country:
Zimbabwe
Jurisdiction:
Constitutional Court of Zimbabwe
Type of document:
Court judgment / legal ruling
Applicant:
T Biti, Member of Parliament for Lobengula Constituency
Respondents:
Samuel Sipepa Nkomo, Minister of Local Government, Rural & Urban Development; Minister of Justice, Legal & Parliamentary Affairs
Legal basis:
Sections 56(1), 85(1), 267, 270, 273 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe
Issue:
Alleged breach of constitutional rights due to failure to enact devolution legislation
Hearing dates:
June 17, 2015 & June 29, 2016
Representation:
T Biti for applicant; M Chimombe for respondents
Year:
2026
Region / City:
North Carolina
Theme:
Economic Development, Infrastructure, Job Creation
Document Type:
Grant Guidelines
Agency / Institution:
Rural Economic Development Division, North Carolina
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Local government units, businesses, economic developers
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Kennebec Valley, Maine
Type of Document:
Application form
Organization / Agency:
Kennebec Valley Council of Governments
Program:
Brownfields Revolving Loan Fund
Intended Recipients:
Businesses, municipalities, nonprofits, and tribes
Purpose:
Request for grant or loan for environmental cleanup and redevelopment of contaminated sites
Required Documentation:
Phase I/II Environmental Assessments, Hazardous Materials Inventory, Site Plans, VRAP correspondence, Deed
Contact:
Jessie Cyr, Economic and Community Development Director, [email protected]
Submission Requirement:
Mandatory meeting or conference call prior to submission
Year:
2013
Region / City:
India
Subject:
Political Systems
Document Type:
Book
Institution:
Kalyani Publishers
Author:
K. K. Ghai
Target Audience:
Undergraduate students of Indian universities and autonomous colleges
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
2013
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2020
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
National Security Law
Document Type:
Syllabus
Organization / Institution:
University of Houston
Author:
Dycus et al.
Target Audience:
Students of Law
Period of Validity:
Fall Semester
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Note:
Year
Topic:
Historic Preservation
Document Type:
Ordinance
Organization / Institution:
Oregon State Historic Preservation Office
Target Audience:
Local Governments
Context:
A model ordinance for local governments to comply with the Certified Local Government (CLG) program, addressing historic preservation processes such as inventory, designation, design review, and appeals.
Year:
2013
Region / City:
Queensland
Topic:
Trade and Investment
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
Queensland Government
Author:
Geoffrey Thomas, John Mickel
Target Audience:
Government officials, policy makers
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
January 2013
Date of Changes:
None
Year:
2015
Region / city:
Wales
Theme:
Management and disposal of higher activity radioactive waste
Document type:
Consultation response
Organization / institution:
CoRWM (Committee on Radioactive Waste Management)
Author:
CoRWM
Target audience:
Welsh Government, policy makers, stakeholders in radioactive waste management
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Theme:
Hazard Mitigation
Document Type:
Data Collection Questionnaire
Target Audience:
Local Governments
Year:
2012
Region / City:
Wales
Subject:
School-based Counselling
Document Type:
Academic Article
Organization / Institution:
British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy, University of Strathclyde
Author:
Joanne Pybis, Andy Hill, Mick Cooper, Karen Cromarty
Target Audience:
Researchers, Policy Makers, Educational Stakeholders
Period of Validity:
2007 and onwards
Approval Date:
2007
Modification Date:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Note:
and the site visit team chair eight (8) weeks prior to the site visit)(4.2024)
Year:
2024
Region / City:
N/A
Theme:
Accreditation
Document Type:
Schedule Template
Organization / Institution:
ARC-PA
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Program administrators, Site visit team
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2022
Organizations:
Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE), Silicon Valley Clean Energy (SVCE), East Bay Community Energy (EBCE)
Document Type:
Code Amendment Recommendations
Scope:
Residential and Nonresidential EV Charging Requirements
Version Dates:
May 11, 2022; July 8, 2022; September 2022; October 2022
Target Audience:
Local jurisdictions and code administrators
Reference:
2022 Title 24 Part 11 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen)
Topics:
EV Charging Stations, EV Ready Spaces, Direct Current Fast Charging, Automatic Load Management Systems, Multifamily and Nonresidential Buildings
URL:
BayAreaReachCodes.Org
Year:
2022
Region / city:
California
Theme:
Water Quality, Environmental Assessment
Document Type:
Technical Report
Organization / Institution:
Caltrans
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Environmental regulators, project managers
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Idaho
Topic:
Conservation, Big Game Species
Document Type:
Guideline
Agency:
Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG)
Author:
Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
Target Audience:
Wildlife managers, conservationists, land management authorities
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified