№ files_lp_4_process_3_135099
File format: docx
Character count: 20255
File size: 98 KB
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Western Kenya
Topic:
Charity Financial Statements
Document Type:
Financial Report
Organization:
Team Kenya
Author:
Lynda Evans, Bhakti Modha, Frithiof Wilhelmsen, Sally Alayarian, Val Wilson, Helen Hodgson, Kamaljeet Singh Kundi, Maire Kennan, Neil Haddow, Pavandeep Rai, Victoria Webber
Target Audience:
Charity stakeholders, partners, and donors
Period of Validity:
2023
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Modifications:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2018/2019
Region / City:
North Lanarkshire
Subject:
Health and social care integration
Document Type:
Annual report
Organization / Institution:
North Lanarkshire Integration Joint Board (IJB)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Stakeholders in health and social care
Period of validity:
2018/2019
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Company registration number:
{000000XXX} / {00000XXXXX}
Company name:
{Company name}
Reporting period:
Year ended {Accounting Reference Date} / {XXXX}
Currency:
USD
Jurisdiction of registration:
Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM)
Registered office address:
{insert office address}, Abu Dhabi Global Market Square, Al Maryah Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Regulatory framework:
ADGM Companies Regulations 2020
Audit status:
Exempt from audit under section 449 (small companies regime)
Directors’ statement:
Responsibilities acknowledged under sections 448 and 449 of the Regulations
Approval date:
{ }
Approving body:
Board of directors
Document structure:
Balance Sheet and Notes to the Financial Statements
Financial statement components:
Non-current assets, Current assets, Liabilities, Shareholders’ equity, Retained earnings
Average number of employees:
{XXX}
Company type:
{insert company type}
Year:
2025
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Financial Results
Document Type:
Financial Report
Organization / Institution:
Metropolitan Housing Trust Ltd / Metropolitan Funding PLC
Author:
Mel Barrett, Chief Executive
Target Audience:
Investors, Stakeholders, Residents
Period of Validity:
FY 2024/25
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Sturminster Marshall
Theme:
Local government, financial records, public rights
Document type:
Public notice
Organization / institution:
Sturminster Marshall Parish Council
Author:
Alison Clothier, Parish Clerk and RFO
Target audience:
Local electors, interested persons
Period of validity:
9 June 2023 - 21 July 2023
Date of approval:
9 June 2023
Date of changes:
N/A
Company:
Silverwood Brands Plc
Alternative name:
Silverwood
Ticker:
SLWD
Market:
Aquis
Reporting period:
Six months ended 30 June 2023
Publication date:
29 January 2024
Document type:
Unaudited interim financial results announcement
Accounting status:
Unaudited
Group structure:
Holding company with subsidiaries
Business focus:
Investment in branded consumer businesses
Brands mentioned:
Balmond Skincare Ltd; Nailberry; Sonotas (Steamcream and Cigarro)
Financial highlights:
Sales £5,847,148; Gross profit £4,440,139; Pre-tax loss £189,232
Currency:
GBP
Geographical markets:
United Kingdom; United States; Japan
Related transaction:
Acquisition of 19.8% stake in Lush Cosmetics Limited and Lush Cosmetic Warriors
Settlement date:
10 January 2024
Chief Executive’s Statement included:
Yes
Financial statements included:
Consolidated Profit and Loss and Other Comprehensive Income; Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
Company:
JD.com, Inc.
Document type:
Form 6-K report of foreign private issuer
Regulatory authority:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Legal basis:
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
Reporting period:
May 2024
Commission file number:
001-36450
Principal executive offices:
20th Floor, Building A, No. 18 Kechuang 11 Street, Yizhuang Economic and Technological Development Zone, Daxing District, Beijing 101111, People’s Republic of China
Signatory:
Ian Su Shan
Position of signatory:
Chief Financial Officer
Date of signature:
May 21, 2024
Exhibits:
Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements; Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Financial reporting period covered in statements:
Three months ended March 31, 2023 and March 31, 2024
Currencies used in statements:
RMB and US$
Accounting scope:
Consolidated financial statements including balance sheets, statements of operations and comprehensive income, cash flows, and changes in shareholders’ equity
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Redmond, OR
Industry:
Battery Storage Solutions
Document Type:
SEC Filing
Organization:
Expion360 Inc.
Author:
Expion360 Inc.
Target Audience:
Investors, Financial Analysts
Period of Effectiveness:
2025
Approval Date:
January 28, 2026
Date of Amendments:
None
Year:
Not provided
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Research ethics, manuscript submission
Document type:
Template
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Authors submitting research articles
Period of validity:
Not provided
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Document Type:
Instructional Template
Audience:
Authors submitting manuscripts to journals
Topics:
Research ethics, Author contributions, Use of AI and LLMs, Conflicts of interest, Funding, Data availability
Organization:
Academic Publishing
Mandatory Sections:
Acknowledgments, Research ethics, Informed consent, Author contributions, Use of LLM, AI and MLT, Conflict of interest, Research funding, Data availability
Optional Sections:
Consultant or advisory role, Role of sponsor, Employment or leadership, Honorarium, Patents, Other remuneration, Software availability, Clinical trial registration
Note:
Year
Year:
2013
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Dependency Claims, Military Benefits
Document Type:
Justification Statement
Organization / Institution:
Department of Defense
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Military members applying for dependency benefits
Effective Period:
N/A
Approval Date:
June 11, 2013
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
Telecommunications and video surveillance services or equipment representations
Document Type:
Certification Form
Organ / Institution:
U.S. Government
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
U.S. Government contractors
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Australia
Topic:
Renewable Energy, Solar Energy
Document Type:
Form
Organization / Institution:
Clean Energy Regulator
Author:
Clean Energy Regulator
Target Audience:
Registered agents, solar battery system owners, installers
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / city:
UK
Subject:
Nuclear Transport Security
Document Type:
Technical Assessment Guide
Organization:
Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR)
Author:
Principal Inspector
Target Audience:
ONR Inspectors
Effective Period:
From publication until next review
Approval Date:
March 25, 2023
Next Scheduled Review:
March 28, 2023
Document Reference:
CNS-TAST-GD-6.7
Record Reference:
ONRHH-822789359-19855
Year:
2024/25
Region / city:
United Kingdom
Theme:
Healthcare, Governance
Document type:
Guidance, Policy
Organization:
NHS England
Author:
NHS England
Target audience:
NHS Trusts, Healthcare Administrators, Compliance Officers
Effective period:
March 2025 and onwards
Approval date:
March 2025
Date of changes:
N/A
Note:
Contextual description
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Global
Theme:
Performance evaluation, Air Force leadership qualities
Document Type:
Instructional guide
Organization:
Air Force
Author:
Unspecified
Target Audience:
Airmen, supervisors, performance evaluators
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2011
Regulation:
The Companies Regulations 2011, as amended
Region / Market:
Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE)
Document Type:
Regulatory guidance / compliance document
Scope:
Pre-Listing Statements (PLS), Revised Listing Particulars (RLP), Circulars
Language:
English
Applicable Parties:
Issuers and applicants seeking listing on JSE
Requirements:
Disclosure obligations, material contracts, corporate actions
Website Obligation:
Operational website for disclosure compliance
Audience:
Investors, shareholders
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Ba Ria-Vung Tau Province
Industry:
Petroleum Equipment, Construction
Document Type:
Official Dispatch
Organization:
Petroleum Equipment Assembly & Metal Structure J.S.C
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Shareholders, Investors, Financial Analysts
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
April 10, 2024
Date of Changes:
N/A