№ lp_1_2_36225
File format: docx
Character count: 7462
File size: 77 KB
The document outlines the procedures for auditing compliance with the VAR-002-WECC-2 standard, which regulates the operation of automatic voltage regulators for synchronous generators and condensers in the Western Interconnection.
Year:
2015
Region / city:
Western Interconnection
Subject:
Reliability Standards, Automatic Voltage Regulators
Document type:
Compliance Audit Worksheet
Organization / institution:
WECC
Author:
WECC Compliance Staff
Target audience:
Entities subject to compliance audits for VAR-002-WECC-2
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
July 2011
Revision date:
July 2015
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2021
Region / city:
Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC)
Topic:
Power System Stabilizer Compliance
Document type:
Audit Worksheet
Organization:
Compliance Enforcement Authority
Author:
Compliance Enforcement Authority
Target audience:
Registered Entities and Compliance Auditors
Period of validity:
From the effective date of the standard
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
Not specified
Year:
2019
Region / city:
Western Interconnection
Subject:
Interchange requirements, reliability assessment, and corrective actions
Document type:
Criteria
Organization:
WECC
Author:
WECC Standards Committee
Target audience:
Functional Entities, Balancing Authorities, Transmission Service Providers
Period of validity:
From June 18, 2019
Approval date:
June 18, 2019
Modification date:
June 18, 2019
Context:
This document outlines the requirements and measures for managing Arranged Interchange within the Western Interconnection, detailing corrective actions for wrongful denial and associated reliability assessments.
Document type:
Process document
Status:
Not a WECC/NERC Standard
Posting:
Posting Two
Region:
Western Interconnection
Organization:
Western Electricity Coordinating Council
Regulatory context:
NERC / FERC
Related standards:
WECC-0141; WECC-0149; FAC-501-WECC-4; FAC-003-4; PRC-023-4
Subject matter:
Bulk Electric System transfer paths
Purpose:
Revision of the Major WECC Transfer Paths table content
Applicability:
Transmission Owners, Transmission Operators, Reliability Coordinators in the Western Interconnection
Decision-making bodies:
WECC Reliability Risk Committee; WECC Board of Directors
Effective date:
First day of the second quarter following regulatory approval of FAC-501-WECC-4 and approval of this Process
Source type:
Regulatory process specification
Year:
2026
Region / city:
WECC Interconnection
Topic:
Load Shedding Assessment
Document Type:
Methodology
Organization / Institution:
WECC
Author:
WECC UFLSWG
Target Audience:
WECC stakeholders, Planning Coordinators, NERC-defined Planning entities
Effective Period:
Biennial assessments
Approval Date:
N/A
Revision Date:
N/A
Year:
2021
Region / city:
Firth of Forth
Theme:
Environmental Regulations, Habitat Conservation, Development Impact Assessment
Document Type:
Guide
Organization / Institution:
European Union
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Developers, Regulators, Environmental Impact Assessors
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2026
Organization:
NAIC Innovation, Cybersecurity and Technology (H) Committee
Type of document:
Regulatory guidance / Supplementary tool
Audience:
State insurance regulators
Topics:
Artificial intelligence, machine learning, insurance risk assessment, consumer protection
Sections:
Exhibit A – Quantify Regulated Entity’s Use of AI Systems; Exhibit B – AI Systems Governance Risk Assessment Framework; Exhibit C – AI Systems High-Risk Model Details; Exhibit D – AI Systems Model Data Details
Scope:
Financial and consumer risk evaluation of AI systems usage in insurance companies
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
Artificial Intelligence, Insurance, Risk Management
Document Type:
Regulatory Tool
Institution:
National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC)
Author:
Big Data and AI Working Group (BDAIWG)
Target Audience:
State Regulators, Insurance Companies
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Amendments:
N/A
FROM:
NAIC Staff
RE:
Information Regarding the Transition to TeamMate+
Year:
2023
Region / city:
NA
Subject:
Pricing and transition details for TeamMate+ implementation
Document type:
Memorandum
Author:
NAIC Staff
Target audience:
State regulators and procurement officers
Period of validity:
Ongoing transition
Approval date:
January 2023
Date of changes:
None specified
Note:
Year
Organization / institution:
Energy Intensive Users Group (EIUG)
Year:
2016
Region / City:
UK
Topic:
Business regulation
Document type:
Impact Assessment
Organization / Institution:
Department for Business Innovation and Skills / Cabinet Office
Author:
Margot James
Target audience:
Regulators, policymakers, businesses
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
25/11/2016
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Organization:
International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T)
Focus Group:
ITU-T Focus Group on AI for Health (FG-AI4H)
Study Period:
2017–2020
Document Code:
FG-AI4H-J-039
Deliverable:
DEL2.2
Version:
0.2.0
Draft Date:
20-09-2020
Meeting:
E-meeting, 30 September – 2 October 2020
Source:
Editors
Editors:
Luis Oala; Christian Johner; Pradeep Balachandran
Contributors:
Alixandro Werneck Leite; Andrew Murchison; Anle Lin; Juliet Rumball-Smith; Pat Baird; Peter G. Goldschmidt; Shan Xu; Sven Piechottka; Zack Hornberger
Purpose:
Discussion
Type of Document:
Technical paper / Draft deliverable
Keywords:
Regulatory Checklist; Software-as-a-Medical Device; AI based Medical Devices
Scope:
Good machine learning practice guidelines for AI-based health solutions
Regulatory References:
IMDRF; FDA
Lifecycle Coverage:
Pre-market and post-market requirements for AI-based medical devices
Year:
2021
Region / city:
South Asia
Topic:
Telecommunication and ICT Regulation
Document Type:
Action Plan
Organization:
South Asian Telecommunication Regulators’ Council (SATRC)
Author:
South Asian Telecommunication Regulators’ Council (SATRC)
Target Audience:
Telecommunication regulators
Period of Action:
2022 – 2023
Approval Date:
3 November 2021
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2023–2025
Location:
ICAR- National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Malegaon, Baramati, Maharashtra, India
Crop:
Mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Kesar
Subject:
Plant growth regulators, biostimulant and deficit irrigation
Irrigation Regimes:
100% ETc and 75% ETc
Experimental Design:
Split plot design with three replications
Treatment Combinations:
Fourteen (T1–T14)
Plant Growth Regulators:
Salicylic acid (200 ppm), CPPU (2.5 ppm)
Biostimulant:
Seaweed extract (4 ml/litre)
Phenological Stages of Application:
Flowering (December–January), Fruit development (February–March), Maturity (April–May)
Parameters Studied:
Vegetative growth, canopy characteristics, yield attributes, biochemical traits
Key Measurements:
Plant height, canopy spread, canopy volume, fruit number, fruit yield, TSS, ascorbic acid, titrable acidity
Document Type:
Experimental research study
Year:
2026
Region / Country:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Technology regulation and economic growth
Document type:
Written evidence
Organization:
ACT | The App Association
Authors:
ACT members and small technology companies
Target audience:
House of Lords Industry and Regulators Committee
Relevant legislation:
Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024; EU Digital Markets Act
Key issues:
Regulatory impact on SMEs, AI policy, standard-essential patent licensing, mobile ecosystem security
Date submitted:
16 January 2026
Appendices included:
Appendix 1 – Mobile Ecosystem SMS designations and roadmaps, 22 December 2025
Document type:
Research proposal section
Research area:
Systems biology and epigenetics
Scientific field:
Gene regulatory network modeling
Research focus:
Integration of epigenetic regulators into gene network inference
Model organism:
Arabidopsis thaliana
Key regulator studied:
SET Domain Group 8 (SDG8)
Homologous human protein:
SETD2
Epigenetic mechanism:
H3K36 histone methylation
Biological processes referenced:
Gene regulation and chromatin modification
Methodological approaches:
Time-course transcriptome analysis, predictive network modeling, dynamic Bayesian networks, state-space modeling
Data sources referenced:
Epigenomics datasets and ENCODE resources
Research objectives:
Identification of genomic targets of epigenetic regulators and evaluation of their role as predictors in gene regulatory network models
Proposed framework:
EpiNet
Research components:
Significance, Innovation, and Approaches
Experimental strategy:
Integration of experimental perturbation data with computational network inference
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Milsons Point, NSW, Australia
Subject:
Financial services regulation, credit card debt, consumer protection
Document type:
Letter
Organization / Institution:
Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC)
Author:
PJ Scribe
Recipients:
Sam Lipski, Robert Raymond
Target audience:
Executive Producers of Four Corners
Period covered:
2001–2017
Reference:
Proposed Four Corners programme "Nobody Cares in a Christian Country"
Key topics:
Persistent revolvers, financial literacy, Reserve Bank of Australia, ASIC, predatory credit card practices
Year:
2026
Date:
3 February 2026
Time:
10.30 am
Location:
London, United Kingdom
Institution:
House of Lords Industry and Regulators Committee
Type of document:
Uncorrected oral evidence transcript
Evidence session number:
10
Questions:
118–130
Hearing format:
Public evidence session
Witnesses:
John Fingleton CBE; Dan Corry OBE; Rebecca Shrubsole
Committee Chair:
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town
Committee members present:
Lord Barber of Ainsdale; Lord Best; Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill; Baroness Drake; Lord Fuller; Baroness Harding of Winscombe; Lord Teverson; Viscount Thurso; Viscount Trenchard; Lord Udny-Lister; Baroness Valentine
Subject:
Regulation and economic growth
Policy areas discussed:
Regulatory policy; nuclear sector regulation; environmental regulation; governance and public administration
Government departments referenced:
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Publication status:
Uncorrected transcript of oral evidence
Broadcast:
Parliamentlive.tv
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Global
Theme:
Plant growth regulators, Seed production, Cherry tomato
Document Type:
Research Review
Author:
Various
Target Audience:
Agricultural researchers, Crop scientists, Horticulturists
Period of Action:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Journal:
Journal of Applied Life Sciences International
Manuscript Number:
Ms_JALSI_151529
Article Title:
Dietary Bioactives as Genomic Regulators: A Critical Review of Gene Control, Biomarker Validation, and Translational Barriers in Nutrigenomics
Article Type:
Review Article
Document Type:
Peer Review Report
Reviewer:
Sumon Rahman Chowdhury
Reviewer Affiliation:
Chittagong Diabetic General Hospital
Country:
Bangladesh
Subject Area:
Nutrigenomics; Nutrigenetics; Epigenetics; Precision Nutrition
Key Scientific Topics:
Gene regulation by dietary bioactives, biomarkers, molecular mechanisms, obesity-related genes, translational barriers
Genes and Pathways Mentioned:
NRF2, NF-κB, FFAR1, FTO, GLUT4, PPARγ, leptin
Methodological Note:
Recommendation to describe methodology as “a narrative critical review using structured literature search”
Ethical Issues Statement:
No ethical issues reported
Purpose of Document:
Evaluation and revision recommendations for a submitted scientific manuscript