№ lp_1_25740
File format: docx
Character count: 6321
File size: 43 KB
This explanatory note outlines the tracking mechanisms for measuring psychomotor and affective competencies in the MAERB Core Curriculum for Medical Assistants.
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Medical Assistant Education
Document Type:
Explanatory Note
Institution:
MAERB (Medical Assisting Education Review Board)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Educational institutions offering Medical Assistant programs
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2008
Region / City:
Durban
Subject:
Intellectual Property, Technology Transfer
Document Type:
Agreement, Policy Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN)
Author:
University of KwaZulu-Natal
Target Audience:
Researchers, Students
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
November 2010
Year:
2024
Region / city:
Australia
Theme:
Disability insurance, legislative amendments, transition to new framework plans
Document Type:
Explanatory document
Organization / Institution:
National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Participants, families, carers, representative organizations, state and territory authorities
Effective Period:
1 July 2026 – 2 October 2029
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Description:
Explanatory document providing details on the transition of participants to new framework plans under the National Disability Insurance Scheme following legislative amendments.
Year:
2019–2024
Region / City:
European Union
Topic:
Invasive Alien Species Reporting
Document Type:
Guidelines
Institution:
European Commission
Author:
European Commission
Target Audience:
Member States of the European Union
Effective Period:
2019–2024
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Document type:
Explanatory memorandum
Legal act concerned:
Regulation (EU) 2023/1115
Policy area:
Environment and climate policy
Subject matter:
Deforestation-free supply chains
Commodities covered:
Cattle, cocoa, coffee, oil palm, rubber, soya, wood
Proposed change:
Postponement of date of application
Length of postponement:
12 months
Original application date:
30 December 2024
Legal basis:
Article 192(1) TFEU
EU institution:
European Commission
Geographical scope:
European Union
Stakeholders concerned:
Member States, operators, traders, third countries
Related strategies:
European Green Deal, EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030, Farm to Fork Strategy
Regulatory impact assessment:
Carried out for Regulation (EU) 2023/1115
Budgetary implications:
As set out in the legislative financial statement attached to Regulation (EU) 2023/1115
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Australia
Topic:
Design and Distribution Obligations
Document Type:
Regulatory Explanatory Statement
Author:
Treasurer
Target Audience:
Financial Product Distributors, Legal and Regulatory Professionals
Period of Action:
Starting April 5, 2021
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2014
Region / city:
United Kingdom
Subject:
Overseas Registration of Births and Deaths
Document Type:
Explanatory Document
Organization:
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Author:
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Target Audience:
Legislators, Government Officials, Public
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Australia
Theme:
Aviation, Safety Regulations
Document Type:
Legislative Instrument
Organ / Institution:
Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA)
Author:
Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA)
Target Audience:
Aviation operators, helicopter operators, emergency service authorities
Period of Effectiveness:
From 2025 onwards
Date of Approval:
2025
Date of Amendments:
2025
Context:
A legislative instrument outlining amendments to the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations (CASR), specifically Part 138, to prescribe fireground personnel carriage operations as aerial work operations.
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Australia
Topic:
Civil aviation regulations, exemptions, aircraft maintenance
Document Type:
Exemption instrument
Issuing Organization:
Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA)
Author:
Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA)
Target Audience:
Aircraft operators, maintenance personnel, certification authorities
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
2022
Amendment Date:
None
Contextual Description:
This document is a legislative instrument that provides exemptions to maintenance requirements for specific Cessna aircraft operating in private and aerial work sectors in Australia.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
European Union
Theme:
Waste management, battery recycling, hazardous waste
Document Type:
Delegated Act
Institution:
European Commission
Author:
European Commission
Target Audience:
Member State authorities, businesses, stakeholders in the waste and battery sectors
Effective Period:
Ongoing after adoption
Approval Date:
5 March 2025
Amendment Date:
Not yet amended
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2020
Region / city:
Global
Topic:
Aviation Safety Oversight
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
ICAO
Author:
ICAO
Target Audience:
Aviation authorities, civil aviation organizations
Validity Period:
N/A
Approval Date:
18 June 2018
Date of Amendments:
2020
Contextual Description:
Detailed explanation of the revisions and structure of the 2020 edition of the ICAO USOAP CMA Protocol Questions (PQs), which are used to assess aviation safety oversight systems.
Year:
2013
Region / city:
Australia
Subject:
Labor Relations, Workplace Bullying, Family-Friendly Workplace Policies, Fair Work Act Amendments
Document Type:
Explanatory Memorandum
Organization / Institution:
Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia
Author:
Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations, the Honourable William Shorten MP
Target Audience:
Legislators, Employers, Unions, Employment and Workplace Relations Stakeholders
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Australia
Topic:
Passport Application Fees
Document Type:
Legislative Instrument
Agency / Institution:
Australian Government
Author:
Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade
Target Audience:
Australian Citizens
Period of Action:
From 1 July 2024
Approval Date:
4 June 2024
Date of Amendments:
4 June 2024
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Geneva
Topic:
Harvested Material, UPOV Convention
Document Type:
Meeting report
Organization:
International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV)
Author:
UPOV Office
Target Audience:
WG-HRV members, UPOV stakeholders
Action Period:
2025-2026
Approval Date:
September 24, 2025
Amendment Date:
N/A
Contextual description:
Report on the possible next steps for the WG-HRV’s work on the Explanatory Notes regarding harvested material under the UPOV Convention, with a focus on the breeder’s right and exhaustion principle.
Year:
2021
Region / city:
Geneva
Theme:
Plant variety protection, UPOV Convention
Document type:
Draft, Explanatory Notes
Organization / institution:
International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV)
Author:
UPOV Secretariat
Target audience:
UPOV members, stakeholders in plant breeding and intellectual property
Period of validity:
Ongoing (as per 1991 UPOV Act)
Approval date:
September 3, 2021
Date of amendments:
None stated
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Switzerland
Topic:
Clinical research, human research projects
Document Type:
Report
Organization:
Swiss Clinical Trial Organisation (SCTO)
Author:
Education Platform of the Swiss Clinical Trial Organisation (SCTO)
Target Audience:
Clinical research professionals, project leaders, and researchers
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Last Update:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2026
Region / city:
Global
Theme:
Education, Healthcare
Document Type:
Guideline
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Healthcare educators, trainers, facilitators
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / city:
United States
Topic:
MDS 2023 Updates, Training Plan Design
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
Author:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
Target Audience:
Healthcare facilities, staff involved in resident care
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Revision Date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Topic:
Competency assessment, audit, Corporations Act
Document type:
Logbook, guidance
Target audience:
Applicants for RCA registration, assessors
Period of validity:
3–5 years