№ files_lp_3_process_7_060145
File format: docx
Character count: 6022
File size: 44 KB
Graffiti prevention and removal guidelines provided for property and business owners to address vandalism.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Saskatoon
Topic:
Graffiti Prevention and Removal
Document Type:
Informational Guide
Organization:
City of Saskatoon
Author:
City of Saskatoon
Target Audience:
Property and business owners, community members
Action Period:
Ongoing
Date of Approval:
2023
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Topic:
Environmental and Social Management Framework
Document Type:
Report
Author:
Ministry of Finance
Target Audience:
Government bodies, development organizations, stakeholders involved in project implementation
Period of Effectiveness:
Not specified
Approval Date:
August 2022
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Description:
This document is a framework for managing environmental and social impacts of the 3R-4-CACE project in conflict-affected communities in Ethiopia, outlining policy, legal frameworks, risks, and mitigation measures.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Global
Theme:
Human rights, HIV response, Trans and gender diverse communities
Document type:
Advocacy submission
Organization / Institution:
Global Action for Trans Equality (GATE)
Author:
Global Action for Trans Equality (GATE)
Target audience:
Policymakers, international health organizations, NGOs
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Document type:
Statutory approval form
Legal basis:
Resource Management Act 1991, sections 95E(3)(a) and 95F(c)
Jurisdiction:
New Zealand
Responsible authority:
Northland Regional Council
Related process:
Resource consent application
Intended signatories:
Owners or occupiers of affected property
Associated documents:
Resource consent application, Assessment of Environmental Effects, site plans
Rights and conditions:
Right to withhold or withdraw written approval prior to determination
Geographic scope:
Northland Region
Source type:
Government administrative form
Year:
2026
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Eating Disorders, Binge Eating, Bulimia
Document Type:
Workshop Material
Organization:
New Maudsley Skills
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Carers, Families affected by eating disorders
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2016-2030
Region / City:
Malaysia
Topic:
HIV, Human Rights, Public Health
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
Malaysian AIDS Council (MAC), Ministry of Health (MOH)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Policymakers, Healthcare Providers, NGOs, Key Populations (MSM, PWID, Transgender Women)
Period of Validity:
2016-2030
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Theme:
Medical referral for chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS)
Document type:
Referral form
Organ / Institution:
BCFS (British Columbia Fatigue Syndrome)
Author:
Unknown
Target audience:
General Practitioners (GPs) and healthcare professionals
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Amendment date:
N/A
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Victoria, Australia
Topic:
Health and Safety
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
Department of Health, Victorian Government
Author:
Department of Health
Target Audience:
General public, people in fire-affected areas
Period of Validity:
Ongoing (until further notice)
Approval Date:
February 2021
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
Unknown
Region / City:
Dynamic Springs
Topic:
Fiction, Sci-Fi
Document Type:
Short Story
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
General Public
Period of Activity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Unknown
Date of Changes:
Unknown
Year:
2015
Region / City:
Global
Subject:
Leprosy, Human Rights, Discrimination
Document Type:
Questionnaire
Author:
Human Rights Council
Target Audience:
Non-Governmental Organizations, Governments, International Organizations
Period of Validity:
N/A
Date of Approval:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2015
Region / City:
Sri Lanka
Topic:
Discrimination, Leprosy, Human Rights
Document Type:
Questionnaire
Organization:
Human Rights Council
Author:
Advisory Committee of the Human Rights Council
Target Audience:
Non-governmental organizations, health organizations, human rights advocates
Period of Validity:
2014-2016
Approval Date:
December 2010
Date of Last Changes:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Cambridge, Milan, Catanzaro, Rome, Rochester
Topic:
Neuroticism, neuroimaging, vestibular disorders, fMRI, persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD)
Document Type:
Research Article
Institution:
University of Cambridge, National Research Council, Mayo Clinic, Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences
Authors:
Luca Passamonti, Roberta Riccelli, Francesco Lacquaniti, Jeffrey P Staab, Iole Indovina
Target Audience:
Researchers, medical professionals, clinicians, neuroscientists
Period of Activity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Al-Hussainiya, Karbala Governorate, Iraq
Subject:
Avocado sapling growth and chemical composition
Document Type:
Research Article
Institution:
Local agricultural nursery
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Agronomists, horticulturists, researchers in tropical fruit cultivation
Experimental Design:
Randomized Completely Block Design (RCBD) factorial
Treatment Factors:
Humic acid concentrations (0, 3, 5 ml/L), Seaweed extract concentrations (0, 2, 4, 6 ml/L)
Measurement Period:
March–November 2022
Measured Parameters:
Plant height, stem diameter, number of branches, number of leaves, leaf area, leaf carbohydrates, macronutrients (N, P, K, Ca)
Application Method:
Foliar spray
Key Findings:
Combined application of 5 ml/L humic acid and 6 ml/L seaweed extract maximized vegetative growth and leaf nutrient content
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Massachusetts, US
Topic:
Public Health / Drinking Water Safety
Document Type:
Notification Letter / Sample Template
Agency / Institution:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP)
Intended Audience:
Households served by the public water system
Lead Sampling Date:
[sample date]
Lead Result:
Greater than 15 ppb
Action Level (90th percentile):
Below 15 ppb
Health Guidance Included:
Yes
Instructions for Household:
Yes
Document Language:
English
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Manchester
Theme:
Security services, Licensing
Document type:
Consultation questionnaire
Organ / Institution:
Home Office
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Security professionals, Employers, Public bodies
Validity period:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Victoria, Australia
Topic:
HIV treatment, healthcare program
Document type:
Official publication
Organization / Institution:
Victorian Government, Department of Health
Author:
Victorian Government
Target audience:
Healthcare professionals, HIV patients, healthcare policy makers
Date of approval:
August 2025
Date of changes:
Not specified
Reference no:
HPV (GBMSM) PGD
Version no:
v5.0
Valid from:
1 September 2025
Review date:
1 April 2028
Expiry date:
1 September 2028
Author:
Suki Hunjunt, Sharif Ismail, David Green
Region / city:
England
Target audience:
Healthcare practitioners administering HPV vaccine to GBMSM
Type of document:
Patient Group Direction
Organisation:
UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA)
Date of approval:
17 July 2025
Date of modifications:
16 July 2025
Context:
A formal Patient Group Direction for the administration of HPV vaccine to GBMSM, detailing legal, clinical, and procedural requirements for healthcare practitioners in England.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Global
Topic:
Vaccine Policy, Maternal Health, Group B Streptococcus
Document type:
WHO Guidance
Institution:
World Health Organization (WHO)
Author:
WHO ECVP
Target audience:
Policymakers, Vaccine Developers, Public Health Authorities
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
March 11, 2025
Date of changes:
Not specified