№ lp_1_2_29295
File format: docx
Character count: 31624
File size: 180 KB
This document is an official application form template for submitting EU framework partnership applications, providing guidelines for preparing and submitting the required documents.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
European Union
Theme:
EU Framework Partnership Applications, Standardisation
Document Type:
Application Form, Annex
Organization / Institution:
EISMEA
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Consortium members, EU project applicants
Validity Period:
Until the call deadline
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Version 3.0, 24.03.2025
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2013
Region / City:
Cowlitz County, Washington
Theme:
Shoreline Management Program
Document Type:
Meeting Summary
Organization / Institution:
Washington State Department of Ecology (ECY), National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Cowlitz County
Author:
Sarah Sandstrom, The Watershed Company
Target Audience:
TAC members, government officials, stakeholders in shoreline management
Period of Action:
2013
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Whatcom County, Bellingham, WA
Theme:
Shoreline Management, Environmental Policy
Document Type:
Guide
Organization:
Whatcom County Council
Author:
Whatcom County Council
Target Audience:
County residents, Planning Commission, Department of Ecology, local stakeholders
Action Period:
2021
Approval Date:
March 9, 2021
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Global
Subject:
Static management program, system administration, device configuration
Document type:
User guide, administrative manual
Organization / Institution:
SCS
Author:
Unknown
Target audience:
System administrators, facility managers, IT professionals
Validity period:
Ongoing
Approval date:
2026
Modification date:
N/A
Year:
2019
Region / City:
N/A
Theme:
Service Metadata Publishing
Document Type:
Specification
Organization:
OASIS
Author:
Kenneth Bengtsson, Erlend Klakegg Bergheim, Sander Fieten, G. Ken Holman
Target Audience:
Technical Committee Members, Business Document Exchange Participants
Effective Period:
N/A
Approval Date:
May 2019
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2015
Region / City:
Aberdeen, Cosmopolis, Hoquiam
Subject:
Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Update
Document Type:
Meeting Agenda
Organization:
CAC (Citizen Advisory Committee)
Author:
Brad Medrud, Annalisa McDaniel
Target Audience:
CAC Members, Joshua Beach
Period of Validity:
May 26, 2015 – July 31, 2015
Approval Date:
May 26, 2015
Date of Changes:
None
Topics Discussed:
Shoreline Management Goals, Critical Areas Regulations, Restoration Plan, Shoreline Use Policies, and more
Meeting Dates:
June 23, 2015, July 28, 2015
Year:
2021
Organization:
OASIS Business Document Exchange (BDXR) TC
Chair:
Kenneth Bengtsson
Editors:
Kenneth Bengtsson, Erlend Klakegg Bergheim, Sander Fieten, G. Ken Holman
Type of document:
Committee Specification
Document format:
Prose specification with XML schemas and model documentation
Related standards:
Service Metadata Publishing (SMP) Version 1.0, Business Document Metadata Service Location Version 1.0
Status:
Authoritative
Abstract:
Protocol for publishing service metadata in 4-corner networks
Publication date:
22 January 2021
Technical scope:
Exchange of business document metadata between endpoints in a network
Intended audience:
Developers and organizations implementing 4-corner network services
License:
OASIS Non-Assertion Mode
Reference URLs:
https://docs.oasis-open.org/bdxr/bdx-smp/v2.0/cs03/bdx-smp-v2.0-cs03.html
, https:
//docs.oasis-open.org/bdxr/bdx-smp/v2.0/bdx-smp-v2.0.html
Year:
2019
Date:
30 January 2019
Version:
2.0
Document status:
Committee Specification Draft 02 / Public Review Draft 02
Document type:
Technical specification
Organization:
OASIS Open
Technical committee:
OASIS Business Document Exchange (BDXR) TC
Chair:
Kenneth Bengtsson
Editors:
Kenneth Bengtsson; Erlend Klakegg Bergheim; Sander Fieten; G. Ken Holman
Related specification replaced:
Service Metadata Publishing (SMP) Version 1.0 (01 August 2017)
Subject:
Service metadata publication protocol in 4-corner networks
Network model:
4-corner network for business document exchange
Key components:
Service Metadata Publisher; Access Points; client applications
Defined technologies:
XML schemas; namespaces for ServiceGroup, ServiceMetadata, AggregateComponents, BasicComponents, ExtensionComponents, QualifiedDataTypes, UnqualifiedDataTypes
Purpose:
Discovery of recipient endpoint metadata for business document exchange
Target users:
developers of business document exchange systems and gateway services
Year:
2026
Region / Location:
Global
Subject:
Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) and Electrical Overstress (EOS) Management
Document Type:
User Guide / Technical Manual
Organization:
SCS (Static Control Systems)
Author:
SCS Technical Documentation Team
Intended Audience:
Electronics manufacturers, engineers, and technical staff
Software Version:
SMP Client 2026
System Requirements:
Networked monitoring devices and SMP Server
Installation Date:
2026
Last Update:
2026
Year:
2024
Region / city:
United Kingdom
Theme:
Organic food certification
Document type:
Form
Organization / institution:
Soil Association
Author:
Soil Association
Target audience:
Companies submitting products for certification
Effective period:
From September 2025
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
March 2024
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
3GPP Specifications
Document Type:
Technical Report
Organization:
3GPP
Author:
Huawei
Target Audience:
Technical professionals involved in 3GPP specifications
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
15th January 2026
Change Date:
N/A
Year:
2020
Region / city:
Australia
Topic:
Biosimilar medicine submission
Document type:
Pharmaceutical submission
Organization / institution:
Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC)
Author:
Maxx Pharma Pty Ltd
Target audience:
Healthcare professionals, regulatory bodies
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
November 2022
Modification date:
November 2022
Year:
2021
Region / City:
West and Central Africa
Topic:
Electricity, Governance, Institutional Strengthening, Africa
Document Type:
Report
Organization:
European Union, African Union Commission
Author:
Dr. Dimitris Papastefanakis, Dr. William Gboney, Dr. George Kyriakarakos, Mr. Jian Bani
Target Audience:
Policy makers, energy sector professionals
Period of Validity:
2021-2040
Approval Date:
August 31, 2021
Date of Revisions:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Australia
Subject:
Chronic migraine, medicinal product submission
Document type:
Submission for PBS listing
Organization:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Australia Pty. Limited
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Health professionals, pharmaceutical regulatory bodies
Period of validity:
Not specified
Date of approval:
2 July 2018
Date of amendments:
November 2023
Year:
2015
Region / City:
Sacramento, California
Theme:
Education, Teacher Credentialing
Document Type:
Program Standards
Agency:
Commission on Teacher Credentialing
Author:
Commission on Teacher Credentialing
Target Audience:
Teacher candidates, educators, educational institutions
Effective Period:
Ongoing, with updates as of July 2024
Approval Date:
December 2015
Revision Date:
July 2024
Note:
Year
Theme:
Theatre Education
Document Type:
Course Matrix
Target Audience:
Teacher Candidates
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Maryland
Topic:
Mortgage Deed of Trust
Document Type:
Legal Instrument
Authority / Institution:
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Lenders, Notaries
Period of Effect:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
07/2021
Modification Date:
06/2025, 09/2025
Year:
2026
Document Type:
Procurement document
Jurisdiction:
United Kingdom
Regulation:
UK General Data Protection Regulation; Data Protection Act 2018
Version:
1.3
Sections:
Part I – Information concerning the procurement procedure and public body; Part II – Information concerning the bidder; Part III – Information on reliance on other entities; Part IV – Selection criteria; Part V – Reduction of qualified candidates; Part VI – Declarations and signature
Year:
2026
Region / city:
United States
Theme:
Housing Assistance, Housing Programs
Document Type:
Notice
Organization / institution:
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Author:
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research, HUD
Target Audience:
Public Housing Agencies, Housing Assistance Stakeholders
Period of Action:
Fiscal Year 2026
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Type of Instrument:
Mortgage - One Hundred Eighty
Instrument Revision Date:
07/2021
Day Redemption:
10/2024 (Authorized Change 12 revised)
Use This Document For:
SD
Lien Type:
First
Product Type:
All
Property Type:
All, except cooperatives
Occupancy Type:
All
Note:
Required Changes
The following changes MUST always be made to this document:
To comply with the requirements of the Truth in Lending Act and Regulation Z (12 C.F.R. § 1026.36(g)), lenders MUST add the name of the mortgage loan originator (LO) and NMLSR ID number for both an organization and individual to the last page of the security instrument.