№ files_lp_4_process_3_100986
File format: docx
Character count: 5798
File size: 18 KB
This essay discusses the nature of government and society, emphasizing the inherent distinctions between the two and advocating for the design of government based on security and freedom.
Year:
1776
Region / city:
Unknown
Subject:
Government, Society, Political Philosophy
Document Type:
Essay
Author:
Thomas Paine
Target Audience:
General public
Period of Effect:
Unknown
Approval Date:
Unknown
Date of Changes:
Unknown
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
RECOGNITION OF DISTINCTION 2026 CONFERMENT OF THE TITLE OF FULL PROFESSOR INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Oxford
Subject:
Academic titles
Document Type:
Application Guide
Organization / Institution:
University of Oxford
Author:
University of Oxford
Target Audience:
Applicants for the position of Full Professor
Period of Validity:
From November 17, 2025, to January 15, 2026
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Oxford
Topic:
University academic titles
Document type:
FAQ
Organization / Institution:
University of Oxford
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
University academic staff, department heads, and applicants
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Bowling Green, KY
Theme:
Psychology, Education
Document Type:
Thesis
Institution:
Western Kentucky University
Author:
Jane E. Doe
Target Audience:
Academic researchers, students, faculty
Period of Validity:
2021
Approval Date:
May 2021
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Publication:
European Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Author:
Damiano Costa
Type:
Academic article
Subject:
Philosophy of religion, metaphysics
Topics:
Existence, Aquinas, Peter Geach, first-order vs second-order properties
Language:
English
Year:
2026
Organization:
Welsh Photographic Federation
Document Type:
Application Form
Target Audience:
Photographers seeking AWPF distinction
Submission Types:
Prints, Digital Images
Application Fee:
£65 (members), £85 (non-members)
Submission Address:
Paul James, 21 Uxilla Terrace, Bridgend, CF31 3BBE
Contact Email:
[email protected]
Payment Method:
Bank Transfer (HSBC)
Rules Acceptance:
Required for submission
Year:
2020
Region / City:
London, ON
Subject:
Nomination for Award of Distinction
Document Type:
Nomination Form
Organization / Institution:
Thames Valley District School Board
Author:
Thames Valley District School Board
Target Audience:
Nominees, Nominators, and Supporters
Period of Validity:
February 17, 2020 (submission deadline)
Approval Date:
Not provided
Date of Changes:
April 2013 (Revised)
Note:
Year
Topic:
Military Families Support
Document Type:
Program Description
Target Audience:
Florida Public and Charter Schools
Period of Validity:
3 years
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Kingston
Topic:
Theatre, National Honours
Document Type:
Award Announcement
Institution:
Government of Jamaica
Author:
Chris Patterson
Target Audience:
General public, theatre professionals
Effective Period:
October 17, 2022
Approval Date:
October 16, 2022
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Scotland, United Kingdom
Subject:
Sale of Single Malt Scotch Whisky casks
Document Type:
Sales Agreement / Terms and Conditions
Organization:
Diageo Scotland Limited
Auction House:
Sotheby’s London
Author:
Diageo Scotland Limited
Target Audience:
Individual buyers of whisky casks
Period of Validity:
From auction date until completion of bottling or delivery
Date of Auction:
14 June 2022
Storage Location:
Diageo-owned bonded warehouse in Scotland
Bottle Design:
Subject to Diageo discretion and uniform design requirement
Payment Terms:
Full payment required to Sotheby’s from buyer’s own bank account
Legal Transfer:
Title to whisky contents transfers upon full payment
Insurance:
Covered up to purchase price until delivery
Year:
1950–2014
Type:
Award recipients list
Subjects:
Individual honors, recognition
Organization:
Unspecified awarding body
Format:
Text list
Geographic focus:
International/unspecified
Notable names:
Kenneth C. Bailey, Christian Michelsen, Sara Leland, Thomas Churchill
Coverage period:
1950–2014
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Oxford
Topic:
Academic Titles, Recognition, Research
Document Type:
Guidelines, Frequently Asked Questions
Organization / Institution:
University of Oxford
Author:
University of Oxford
Target Audience:
University academic and senior research staff
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2023
Region / City:
USA
Topic:
Writing guidelines, Document formatting
Document type:
Guide
Author:
Andrea Snarr
Target Audience:
Writers preparing documents for HTML publishing
Date of approval:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / city:
Australasia
Topic:
Short Story Writing, Emerging Writers
Document Type:
Prize Announcement
Organization:
Australasian Association of Writing Programs (AAWP), Australian Short Story Festival (ASSF)
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Emerging Writers
Period of Validity:
Opens New Year, closes 31 July 2022
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Context:
A prize offering publication, networking opportunities, and festival participation for emerging short story writers in Australasia.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Vancouver
Theme:
Literature, Authors, Book Lists
Document Type:
Event Schedule
Organization / Institution:
Vancouver Writers Fest
Target Audience:
General public, literary enthusiasts
Period of Action:
October 20–26, 2025
Approval Date:
June 26, 2025
Note:
Year
Year:
1886
Region / City:
United States / New Zealand
Theme:
Christmas, cultural perspectives, consumerism
Document Type:
Non-fiction texts
Author:
Washington Irving, Anonymous (journalist)
Target Audience:
General public
Period of Action:
19th century, 2016
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Brimbank
Topic:
Literature, Cultural Heritage
Document Type:
Event Program
Organization / Institution:
Brimbank City Council
Author:
Brimbank City Council
Target Audience:
General Public
Period of Action:
12–17 March 2026
Date of Approval:
Unknown
Date of Changes:
Unknown
Year:
1985
Note:
Region / City
Theme:
Literature, Transgression, Dystopian Fiction, Gothic Fiction
Document Type:
Literary Analysis
Year:
2025
Organization:
Royal Court Theatre
Program:
Writers’ Card Lottery Fund
Target Audience:
Writers holding a Royal Court Writers’ Card
Payment Amount:
£600 per winner
Number of Awards:
10
Eligibility Criteria:
Registered Writers’ Card members, with reserved awards for Black and/or Global Majority, Working Class, and D/deaf, disabled or neurodivergent writers
Application Deadline:
19 February 2025
Submission Method:
Online portal only
Document Type:
Guidance and application instructions