№ lp_1_18182
File format: docx
Character count: 12293
File size: 54 KB
This document is a formal notice from Massachusetts Department of Family and Medical Leave to employers about their obligations under the Massachusetts Paid Family and Medical Leave (PFML) law.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Massachusetts
Topic:
Paid Family and Medical Leave (PFML)
Document Type:
Employer Notice
Organization / Institution:
Massachusetts Department of Family and Medical Leave (DFML)
Author:
Massachusetts Department of Family and Medical Leave
Target Audience:
Massachusetts employers with 25 or more employees and covered contract workers
Period of Validity:
2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2020
Region / City:
European Space Agency
Topic:
Space Technology, Business Incubation
Document Type:
Guideline
Organization / Institution:
European Space Agency Business Incubation Centres (ESA BICs)
Author:
European Space Agency
Target Audience:
Entrepreneurs, Start-ups, ESA BIC Applicants
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
23/06/2020
Modification Date:
30/09/2022
Note:
Year
Theme:
Menu
Document Type:
Restaurant Menu
Year:
2014
Region / city:
Geneva
Subject:
Assessing uniformity by off-types
Document type:
Report
Organization / institution:
International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV)
Author:
UPOV Office
Target audience:
UPOV members and experts in plant variety assessment
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Mental Health, Cultural Dynamics, Faith and Work
Document Type:
Assignment
Organization / Institution:
Grand Canyon University
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Mental Health Workers, Students of Mental Health
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
Not specified
Region / city:
Australia
Topic:
Economy, taxation, corporate policy
Document type:
Draft Recommendation
Organization / institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Policymakers, economists, public officials
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / city:
-
Theme:
Research Paper Submission Guidelines
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
CRC-SPAST
Author:
John Doe, Smith Jones, Ananva Sharma
Target Audience:
Authors submitting to CRC-SPAST
Period of Validity:
-
Approval Date:
-
Date of Changes:
-
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Travel Services, App Development, Tourism
Document Type:
Press Release
Organization / Institution:
Airbnb
Author:
Brian Chesky
Target Audience:
Travelers, Airbnb Users, Service Providers
Effective Period:
2025 and beyond
Approval Date:
2025
Modification Date:
Ongoing updates
Year:
2024
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Cybersecurity and Anti-virus Software Certification
Document Type:
Compliance Requirement
Organization / Institution:
Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Author:
FCC
Target Audience:
Telecommunications Certification Bodies (TCBs), Equipment Manufacturers
Period of Validity:
From July 23, 2024
Approval Date:
July 23, 2024
Date of Amendments:
None
Year:
N/A
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Academic Writing
Document Type:
Thesis Outline
Organization / Institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Students, Scholars
Effective Period:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Revision Date:
N/A
Year:
2019
Note:
Region / City
Theme:
Psychiatric nursing, practice placement
Document Type:
National Competence Assessment Document
Target Audience:
Undergraduate nursing students
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Ashland, Ohio
Subject:
Terms of Call for Non-Installed Ministers
Document Type:
Terms of Call Form
Ordaining Body or Ordaining Denomination:
Presbyterian Church (USA)
Target Audience:
Non-Installed Ministers of Word & Sacrament
Approval Date:
N/A
Effective Date:
N/A
Date of Last Review:
N/A
Benefits:
Medical, Pension, Death and Disability, Long-term Disability, Dental, Vision, SECA
Professional Expenses:
Continuing Education, Travel Reimbursement, Other
Special Provisions:
Paid Time Off, Study Leave, Sabbatical
Minimum Effective Salary:
$25,000
Compensation Review Date:
N/A
Year:
2019
Region / City:
N/A
Subject:
Committee Structure, Strategic Planning, Faculty Review
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Faculty Members
Effective Period:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2018
Region / City:
Oxfordshire
Topic:
Mental Health Services
Document Type:
Service Information Leaflet
Organization:
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust
Author:
Oxford Health CAMHS
Target Audience:
Young People, Parents, Carers
Period of Effectiveness:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Context:
Information document about the Getting More Help service in Oxfordshire CAMHS for children and adolescents experiencing mental health difficulties.
Year:
Not provided
Region / City:
Not provided
Theme:
Research methodology
Document type:
Academic paper
Organization:
AGH University of Science and Technology Press
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Researchers, academics, students
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not provided
Date of amendments:
Not provided
Year:
2026
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Occupational illness compensation, impairment evaluation
Document type:
Letter, response form
Organization / Institution:
U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs
Author:
Unknown
Target audience:
Claimants under EEOICPA
Period of validity:
Indefinite
Approval date:
Not provided
Modification date:
Not provided
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Kentucky
Topic:
Personnel Policies
Document Type:
Policy
Organization / Institution:
Kentucky Board of Education
Author:
Superintendent
Target Audience:
Classified Employees
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
07/27/2020
Date of Changes:
N/A
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Ottawa
Subject:
Health Insurance Coverage
Document Type:
Contractual Agreement
Organ / Institution:
Embassy of Italy
Target Audience:
Economic Operators
Period of Validity:
Five years
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Jersey
Subject:
Employment law, employee rights
Document type:
Contract, legal terms
Institution:
Employment Tribunal, JACS
Author:
Unknown
Target audience:
Employers, employees in Jersey
Period of validity:
Indefinite
Approval date:
September 2025
Amendment date:
None