№ files_lp_3_process_7_048171
File format: docx
Character count: 1094
File size: 1479 KB
This document provides a customizable daily schedule for caregivers to plan and visually organize activities for individuals, using images and words.
Year:
N/A
Region / City:
N/A
Subject:
N/A
Document type:
Instructional guide
Organization / Institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target audience:
Caregivers, educators, parents
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Theme:
Employment Package, Prison Service
Document Type:
Employment Policy
Author:
Michelle Jarman-Howe, Chief Operating Officer Prisons
Target Audience:
HMPPS Employees
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
December 2023
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Sundial contest
Document type:
Participation sheet
Organization:
EAAE (European Association for Astronomy Education)
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Participants of the sundial contest
Effective period:
Until October 31, 2024
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Global
Theme:
Pharmaceutical industry, R&D, patient groups
Document type:
Questionnaire
Organization / institution:
PatientView
Author:
PatientView
Target audience:
Pharmaceutical companies, patient groups
Effective period:
2025-2026
Approval date:
March 30, 2026
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / city:
London
Topic:
Disability, Neurodiversity, Higher Education, Personal Experience
Document Type:
Article
Organization:
University of London
Author:
Sarah Hopp
Target Audience:
Researchers, Educators, Neurodivergent Learners, Academic Professionals
Period of Action:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Date:
December 1, 2024
Series:
Extra! Ideas for Adults – Looking Forward to Christmas
Session:
1
Theme:
Hope through the coming of Jesus
Biblical References:
Isaiah 40:1–2; Isaiah 40:3–5; Isaiah 40:9–11
Subject:
Christian hope in the context of Christmas and contemporary disasters
Geographical References:
North Carolina; Florida; Gulf Coast; Forest City, NC; Southwest Michigan
Individuals Mentioned:
Paul McGinnis; Erika Morrison; Chris Morrison
Organization:
Grace Chapel, Forest City, NC
Type of Document:
Adult Bible study session guide
Intended Audience:
Adult small group leaders and participants
Source Referenced:
Heroes of Hurricane Helene: How communities are rallying to help
This site gives you a list of the top 50 think tanks. It’s a good place to start. I like to consult the University of Pennsylvania’s “Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program.” They provide de:
//www.brookings.edu/
Brookings Institute is usually ranked as the #1 think tank in the U.S. and as one of the five think tanks with the greatest global influence, often ranked #1 in that category as well. Brookin:
//www.heritage.org/
Heritage Foundation focuses on public policy “based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense.” :
//www.cato.org/mission
Cato Institute focuses on public policy, and its aim is “…to originate, disseminate and increase understanding of public policies based on principles of individual liberty, limited government:
//www.hrw.org/
Note:
Human Rights Watch focuses on civil liberties and human rights worldwide. Their work is truly global in scale and they bring scholarship to bear on every aspect of human rights. Today, for example, they offer commentary on worker safety in the U.S., how the jewelry industry fuels human rights violations, Trumps actions and comments since the election, the effects of US “remain in Mexico” policy on children and families, infringements on journalism in China, rebel violence in Central African Republic, and the inequalities in availability of COVID-19 vaccines. Perspective – traditional liberalism; global www.csis.org
The Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS) focuses on international affairs. Its daily brief The Evening is great going to bed reading – not in the sense of “it’s boring,” but in:
“CSIS’s purpose is to define the future of national security. We are guided by a distinct set of values – non-partisanship [they mean that], independent thought, innovative thinking, cross-disciplinary scholarship, integrity and professionalism, and talent development.” A modest agenda. Their definition of national security is well beyond “military strategy” and includes issues like global health, climate change, and human rights and the have programs with a regional focus as well. They DO have a strong focus on defense strategy. It is the overarching concern within which climate change, food security, poverty, and the African program are critical issues. Perspectives – traditional conservatism, US but with a strong global focus as well. www.jointcenter.org
The Black Institute is an action oriented think tank that is “… a Black-led policy and organizing institution dedicated to solving local problems and addressing the concerns of Black families:
education, economic fairness, environmental justice, and immigration reform. You have to click on the menu button (upper right of banner) and ten on research and publications to see the full range of issues TBI addresses. These are well-developed and documented policy pieces with a strong focus on community. Perspective – independent, national (but includes immigration) https://aipi.asu.edu/
Year:
2017
Region / city:
Scotland
Theme:
Youth justice, criminal justice
Document type:
Research paper
Institution:
Scottish Prison Service, Scottish Government, Centre for Youth & Criminal Justice
Author:
Dr Gill Robinson, Jenny Leishman, Dr Claire Lightowler
Target audience:
Professionals in youth justice, social workers, policy makers
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of amendments:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Metro region
Theme:
Medical Recruitment
Document Type:
Job Posting
Organization / Institution:
Affinity Health Group
Author:
Michael Echols
Target Audience:
Physicians seeking new opportunities
Period of Action:
Open recruitment
Approval Date:
N/A
Change Date:
N/A
Standard:
ChemBio 1.2
Subject Area:
Chemistry and Biology
Level:
Secondary Education
Document Type:
Teacher Guidance for Assessment Activity
Focus:
Chemical reactions in te ao Māori contexts
Key Concepts:
Reaction types; reactants and products; diagnostic tests; conservation of mass; balanced chemical equations
Assessment Component:
Portfolio of laboratory practical investigations
Referenced Note:
Explanatory Note 2
Intended Audience:
Kaiako and ākonga
Educational Context:
Laboratory modelling of five specified reaction types
Learning Outcomes:
Identification and categorisation of reaction types; selection of generic and chemical terms; application of balanced equations; explanation of conservation of mass
Count:
40
Wall:
4
Level:
Beginner
Choreographer:
Siggi Güldenfuß (DE) & Andrea Dorn (DE) - January 2026
Music:
Looking For Happy - Lost Hollow
Year:
2026
Region / City:
N/A
Theme:
Dance
Document Type:
Dance routine
Organization / Institution:
N/A
Author:
Siggi Güldenfuß, Andrea Dorn
Target Audience:
Beginners
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Event title:
Secure Care in Scotland, Looking Ahead
Date:
Thursday 21 April 2016
Type of document:
Conference programme – presenter biographies
Subject:
Secure care, residential child care, social work, youth justice, child protection
Geographical focus:
Scotland
Organisations represented:
Good Shepherd Centre; Who Cares? Scotland; CoSLA; St Mary’s Kenmure; Social Work Scotland; CYCJ; Kibble; Rossie Young People’s Trust; WithScotland; Scotland Excel
Audience:
Professionals and stakeholders in secure care, social work and related services
Presenters:
Audrey Baird; Laura Beveridge; Mike Callaghan; Jim Crawford; Cheryl-Ann Cruickshank; Karen Dyball; Alison Gough; Dan Johnson; David Mitchell; Beth Smith; Julie Welsh
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Perth
Topic:
COVID-19 Vaccination Promotion
Document Type:
Entry Form
Organization / Institution:
NACCHO
Author:
NACCHO
Target Audience:
Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations and their representatives
Period of Action:
2023
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2020
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
Software procurement and support
Document Type:
Request for Information
Organization:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Author:
David Melton
Target Audience:
Vendors, small businesses, contractors
Period of Effectiveness:
05/19/2020 - 05/18/2021
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2013
Location:
Michigan, Indiana, USA
Theme:
Sustainable small-scale farming
Document type:
Workshop series announcement
Organizer:
Bertrand Farm, Clay Bottom Farm, Prairie Winds Farm
Audience:
Beginner and small-scale farmers
Dates:
May 20 – August 12, 2013
Format:
Series of six hands-on workshops
Topics covered:
Organic farming, greenhouse production, poultry and beekeeping, permaculture practices, food preservation
Registration:
Payment required, limited space, discount for full series
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Manchester
Theme:
Security services, Licensing
Document type:
Consultation questionnaire
Organ / Institution:
Home Office
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Security professionals, Employers, Public bodies
Validity period:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Victoria, Australia
Topic:
HIV treatment, healthcare program
Document type:
Official publication
Organization / Institution:
Victorian Government, Department of Health
Author:
Victorian Government
Target audience:
Healthcare professionals, HIV patients, healthcare policy makers
Date of approval:
August 2025
Date of changes:
Not specified
Reference no:
HPV (GBMSM) PGD
Version no:
v5.0
Valid from:
1 September 2025
Review date:
1 April 2028
Expiry date:
1 September 2028
Author:
Suki Hunjunt, Sharif Ismail, David Green
Region / city:
England
Target audience:
Healthcare practitioners administering HPV vaccine to GBMSM
Type of document:
Patient Group Direction
Organisation:
UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA)
Date of approval:
17 July 2025
Date of modifications:
16 July 2025
Context:
A formal Patient Group Direction for the administration of HPV vaccine to GBMSM, detailing legal, clinical, and procedural requirements for healthcare practitioners in England.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Global
Topic:
Vaccine Policy, Maternal Health, Group B Streptococcus
Document type:
WHO Guidance
Institution:
World Health Organization (WHO)
Author:
WHO ECVP
Target audience:
Policymakers, Vaccine Developers, Public Health Authorities
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
March 11, 2025
Date of changes:
Not specified