№ lp_1_2_49439
File format: docx
Character count: 25600
File size: 69 KB
The document provides an overview of the organizational structure and functions of the Design and Construction Group within the Office of General Services (OGS) in New York State.
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
New York State
Topic:
Architecture, Engineering, Construction Management
Document Type:
Organizational Structure, Report
Agency / Institution:
New York State Office of General Services (OGS)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
State Agencies, Contractors, Consultants
Period of Activity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Chapter:
9
Section:
9.3
Subject:
Multiple Prime Contracts
Jurisdiction:
New York State
Governing law:
New York State Finance Law §135 (Wicks Law)
Related law:
New York State Labor Law §222
Issuing organization:
New York State Office of General Services Design & Construction
Project types:
Public building construction and alteration
Contracting method:
Multiple Prime Contracts
Cost thresholds:
$3 million (NYC counties), $1.5 million (Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester), $0.5 million (other counties)
Prime contracts:
Construction; Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning; Plumbing; Electrical
Document type:
Design and contracting guidance
Source type:
Administrative design guide
Scope exclusions:
Site utilities outside buildings; building demolition
Content period:
As amended through April 3, 1961
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Ontario
Theme:
Education, Graduate Studies
Document Type:
Administrative Guidelines
Institution:
University of Guelph
Author:
Ontario Government and Participating Institutions
Target Audience:
Graduate Program Assistants, Graduate Program Coordinators
Period of Action:
2021-2022
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Important Dates:
January 31, 2021, March 26, 2021, Early April 2021
International Applications:
Yes
Aboriginal Applications:
Yes
Maximum Support Duration:
6 years
Note:
Year
Organization / Institution:
OGS Design and Construction
Target Audience:
A/E Consultants, OGS D&C Staff
Form Number:
OGS Form 14
Revision Date:
March 2018
Institution:
Mindanao State University Iligan Institute of Technology
Location:
Iligan City
Office Addressed:
Dean, School of Computer Studies
Document Type:
Academic request form
Purpose:
Request for signing of approval sheet
Related Academic Work:
Special Project / Thesis / Dissertation
Submission Requirements:
CD-ROM with e-copy of manuscript, abstract in MS Word format, and research article
Additional Submission Requirements:
Three hard copies of the abstract and four hard copies of the research article
Research Information Fields:
Research Title, Degree, Adviser
Publication Option:
MSU-IIT Research Journal, Mindanao Forum, Asia Pacific Journal of Science, Mathematics & Engineering
Approval Authorities:
College Graduate Coordinator; Dean, School of Computer Studies
Intended Users:
Graduate students of the School of Computer Studies
Institutional Unit:
Office of Graduate Studies / School of Computer Studies
Note:
Year
Topic:
Produce Prescription Program, Community-Based Partnerships
Document Type:
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
Target Audience:
Community-based organizations, healthcare providers, clinics
Context:
Template for establishing a formal partnership agreement between a community-based organization and a clinic to implement a produce prescription program.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Geneva
Subject:
Basel Convention, Harmonized System, waste classification, World Customs Organization
Document Type:
Report
Organization:
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
Author:
UNEP Secretariat
Target Audience:
Parties to the Basel Convention, World Customs Organization
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Context:
A report outlining the progress made by the World Customs Organization regarding amendments to the Harmonized System related to the Basel Convention, focusing on waste classification and customs system adjustments.
Year:
2020-2022
Region/City:
Winston-Salem, NC
Theme:
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program, Transportation
Document Type:
Methodology Document
Organization/Agency:
City of Winston-Salem, Winston-Salem Transit Authority, Winston-Salem Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
Author:
Marlene Davis, DBE Liaison, Title VI Coordinator
Target Audience:
Local Government, Transportation Agencies, DBE Firms
Period of Validity:
FY 2020 – FY 2022
Approval Date:
August 2020
Date of Changes:
None listed
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Madison, Wisconsin
Topic:
Organization Rules and Membership Guidelines
Document Type:
Rules and Regulations
Author:
Wisconsin Organization of Furries
Target Audience:
Students and alumni of UW-Madison, MATC, and Edgewood College who self-identify as furries
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
2023
Date of Amendments:
None listed
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Geneva
Topic:
Climate Data Management
Document Type:
Resolution Draft
Organization:
World Meteorological Organization
Author:
Chair of the Standing Committee on Information Management and Technology (SC-IMT)
Target Audience:
WMO Members
Period of Action:
2024-2027
Approval Date:
15 April 2024
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Oregon
Topic:
Home energy assessments, energy incentives, funding
Document Type:
Q&A
Organization:
Energy Trust of Oregon
Target Audience:
Community-based organizations, Home Energy Assessors
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2025-2026
Region / City:
Ohio
Theme:
Student Organization Regulations
Document Type:
Guide
Institution:
Ohio State University
Author:
Ohio Union and Student Activities
Target Audience:
Registered student organizations
Period of Validity:
Annual
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
202X-202X
Region / City:
Washington, D.C.
Subject:
Lease Agreement, Education, Government, Tribal Affairs
Document Type:
Legal Agreement
Organization / Institution:
United States Department of the Interior
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Not specified
Period of Validity:
[START DATE] - [END OF YR 2]
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Year:
202X
Region / City:
Washington, D.C.
Topic:
Facility Lease Agreement
Document Type:
Legal Contract
Organization / Institution:
U.S. Department of the Interior
Author:
[TRIBE/TRIBAL ORGANIZATION NAME], U.S. Government
Target Audience:
Tribal Organizations, U.S. Government Agencies
Effective Period:
[START DATE] to [END OF YR 2]
Approval Date:
[Date of Signing]
Amendment Date:
[Date of Modification, if applicable]
Year:
202X
Region / City:
Washington, D.C.
Topic:
Facility Lease Agreement
Document Type:
Lease Agreement
Organization / Institution:
United States Department of the Interior
Author:
[TRIBE/TRIBAL ORGANIZATION NAME]
Target Audience:
U.S. Government, Tribal Organizations
Effective Period:
[START DATE] to [END OF YR 2]
Approval Date:
[Date of Agreement]
Amendment Date:
[Date of Modification]
Year:
2026
Region / city:
Not specified
Theme:
Formatting, Template Creation, Paper Preparation
Document Type:
Template
Organization:
Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Researchers, Authors
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Description:
Template for formatting papers in MS Word 2007, specifying required paper components and styling rules for scientific research documents.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Pomona, California
Topic:
Student organizations, leadership, university policies
Document type:
Handbook
Organization / Institution:
Cal Poly Pomona, Bronco Leadership Center
Author:
Bronco Leadership Center
Target Audience:
Cal Poly Pomona students and student organizations
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
2026
Date of changes:
2026
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Uganda, Kampala
Subject:
Procurement
Document Type:
Expression of Interest (EOI)
Organization / Institution:
GOAL Relief and Development Organization
Author:
GOAL Uganda
Target Audience:
Suppliers of goods, services, and works
Period of Validity:
2025-2028
Approval Date:
24th March 2025
Amendment Date:
14th April 2025
Note:
Description
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Maine
Topic:
Behavioral Health Home Organization
Document Type:
Health Care Regulations
Agency / Institution:
MaineCare
Target Audience:
Health care providers, mental health professionals
Year:
2005
Region / City:
Caribbean and Adjacent Regions
Theme:
Tsunami Warning System, Coastal Hazards
Document Type:
Organizational Structure
Organization:
Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC)
Author:
ICG/CARIBE-EWS
Target Audience:
Member States, Regional Stakeholders
Period of Effect:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified