№ files_lp_4_process_1_22101
File format: docx
Character count: 6819
File size: 31 KB
Checklist detailing all mandatory requirements, deadlines, and submissions for incoming nursing students to enroll in the Shepherd University program, including health, safety, and administrative verifications.
Year:
2018
Institution:
Shepherd University
Department:
Nursing Education
Document Type:
Instruction / Checklist
Audience:
New nursing students
Program Start:
Spring 2019 Semester
Required Actions:
Immunizations, CPR certification, health forms, drug screening, criminal background check, professional liability insurance, reading and testing modules
Deadlines:
Various, between October 29, 2018 and January 11, 2019
Contacts:
Dr. Sharon Mailey, Esther Stitt
Web Resources:
CastleBranch.com, ATItesting.com, American Heart Association
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2018
Region / city:
Harare
Subject:
Legal procedure
Document type:
Court ruling
Organization / institution:
High Court of Zimbabwe
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Legal professionals, judiciary
Effective period:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
Not specified
Year:
2012
Region / City:
Shepherdstown, West Virginia
Topic:
Teacher Education, Student Teacher Evaluation
Document Type:
Guidelines
Institution:
Shepherd University
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Student Teachers, University Supervisors, Cooperating Teachers
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
UK
Topic:
Physical Activity for Children
Document Type:
Informational Resource
Author:
UK Chief Medical Officers
Target Audience:
Children, Parents, School Staff
Action Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Context:
Document provides information about daily physical activity recommendations for children and suggests resources for engaging in physical activities.
Year:
2025-2026
Region / City:
New Orleans, LA
Topic:
School Meals
Document Type:
Media Release
Organization:
Good Shepherd School
Author:
Good Shepherd School
Target Audience:
Students, Parents, General Public
Period of Action:
2025-2026
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2019
Institution:
Shepherd University
Course Code:
FYEX 101
Term:
Spring 2019
Credit Hours:
1
Instructor:
Name
Location:
Section 00, campus classrooms
Course Type:
First-Year Seminar
Target Audience:
First-year undergraduate students
Core Curriculum Competencies:
Critical Thinking, Life-Long Learning, Wellness, Information Literacy, Experiential Learning
Required Materials:
Step by Step to College and Career Success (7th Edition), The Girl With Seven Names
Assessment Components:
Attendance, Participation, Assignments, Exams
Support Services:
Academic Support Center, Disability Support Services
Policies:
Academic Integrity, Class Attendance, Inclement Weather, Electronic Communication
Organization:
American Kennel Club
Host Club:
Gold Canyon German Shepherd Dog Club
Event Type:
Specialty Show
Event Dates:
Friday, Dec. 10, 2010; Saturday, Dec. 11, 2010; Sunday, Dec. 12, 2010
Event Numbers:
#2010009355; #2010087903; #21010087902
Venue:
Clarion Hotel Phoenix
Venue Address:
5121 E. La Puenta Ave, Phoenix, AZ 85044
Entry Closing Date:
Wednesday, November 24, 2010, 6:00 PM
Superintendent:
Jackie Lawrence
Mailing Address for Entries:
2070 E. Melrose St., Gilbert, AZ 85297-1130
Applicable Rules:
AKC Rules, Regulations, Policies and Guidelines
Arbitration Body:
American Arbitration Association
Classes Offered:
Conformation, Obedience, Rally, Junior Showmanship
Eligible Participants:
Owners, authorized agents, Junior Handlers
Year:
2022
Location:
Honolulu, HI, USA
Type:
Enrollment Form
Institution:
Good Shepherd Preschool
Program:
Summer Fun 2022, School Year 2022-2023
Schedule Options:
Half Day, School Day, Extended Day
Target Audience:
Children eligible for preschool enrollment
Emergency Contacts:
Required
Medical Information:
Required
Language Support:
English and optional Chinese translation
Observation Dates:
January–July 2022
Religious Background:
Optional
Financial Aid Programs:
Preschool Open Doors, Pauahi Keiki Scholars, Childcare Connection, ARBOR
Year:
2026
Institution:
University of Georgia
Position:
Associate Dean for Research, Scholarship, and Partnerships, Franklin College of Arts and Sciences
Distinguished Title:
Georgia Athletic Association Distinguished Professor of Geography and Atmospheric Sciences
Other Roles:
Director, Atmospheric Sciences Program; Associate Director for Climate and Outreach, Institute for Resilient Infrastructure Systems
Education:
Ph.D. in Physical Meteorology, Florida State University, 1999; M.S. in Physical Meteorology, Florida State University, 1993; B.S. in Meteorology, Florida State University, 1991
Research Areas:
Hydrometeorology, Urban Climate, Tropical Precipitating Systems, Extreme Weather and Climate Events, Climate Vulnerability, Innovative Applications of Climate Data, Diversity in Atmospheric Sciences
Professional Experience:
NOAA-NWS Meteorological Technician, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Research Meteorologist, Purdue University Graduate Faculty
Memberships:
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, American Academy of Arts and Sciences
Outreach:
Host at Weather Channel, Senior Contributor at Forbes
Tenure Status:
Tenured since 2009
Graduate Faculty Status:
Full Graduate Faculty at University of Georgia since March 2006
Publications and Grants:
Over 110 peer-reviewed journals, more than $12 million in extramural grants
Context:
Academic CV detailing the educational background, professional appointments, research focus, leadership roles, and outreach activities of a prominent meteorologist and climate scientist.
Year:
2016-2017
Institution:
Good Shepherd Episcopal School
Type:
Financial Aid Application Guide
Partner Organization:
School and Student Services (SSS) by the National Association of Independent Schools
Contact:
Donna Blythe, Heather Vaughn
Application Deadline:
January 29, 2016
Required Documents:
2014 Tax Return (1040, 1040A, or 1040EZ), 2014 Schedule C
Fee:
$41 nonrefundable
Submission Method:
Online via SSS PFS account or by mail
Audience:
Parents of prospective students applying for financial aid
Context:
Guide provides step-by-step instructions for completing and submitting the Parents’ Financial Statement and additional required documents for the 2016-17 academic year financial aid process.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Marshfield
Theme:
Religion
Document Type:
Church Service Bulletin
Organization:
Good Shepherd Lutheran Church
Author:
Rev. Katie Anderson, Rev. Lois Swanson
Target Audience:
Congregants, Church Members
Period of Validity:
June 4, 2023
Approval Date:
June 4, 2023
Date of Changes:
None
Year:
2013
Region / City:
Shepherdstown, West Virginia
Theme:
Core Curriculum, Academic Proposals
Document Type:
Meeting Minutes
Organization / Institution:
Shepherd University
Author:
Timothy K. Nixon, Ph.D.
Target Audience:
Faculty, Committee Members, Academic Administrators
Period of Effect:
March 20, 2013
Approval Date:
March 20, 2013
Date of Changes:
N/A
Date:
May 13, 2024
Time:
6:00 PM
Organization:
Good Shepherd Catholic Church
Document Type:
Finance Committee Meeting Minutes
Location:
Parish finance meeting
Participants:
Ruth Becker; Steve Piper; Ken Schenk; Ben Joergens; Ron Pohl; Fr. Zach Etienne; Dianne Thomas
Agenda Topics:
Financial review; capital expenditures; preschool finances; SCRIP inventory; staffing expenses; endowment income adjustments; cleaning services; 2024–2025 budget planning; copier lease expenses; technology accounts; financial aid projections; fire alarm system replacement; copier lease proposals; school lunch pricing
Budget Period Discussed:
2024–2025 fiscal year
Financial Topics:
Sunday collection projections; parish assessments; salary categorization; copier lease expenses; restricted technology funds; tuition assistance
School Matters:
Fire alarm system quotes; copier lease agreements; school lunch price increase
Prepared By:
Dianne Thomas
Approval Status:
Previous meeting minutes approved
Date:
November 1, 2016
Biblical passages:
1 Kings 1:1–2:46; 1 Chronicles 21:28–30; 1 Chronicles 22–27; 2 Samuel 6; 2 Samuel 12:2–25; Ephesians 2:19–22
Subject:
Life and final years of King David
Theme:
Preparation for the Temple and succession of Solomon
Type:
Bible study class notes
Religious tradition:
Christianity
Primary figures:
David, Solomon, Bathsheba, Adonijah, Nathan, Zadok
Historical context:
Kingdom of Israel during the reign of King David
Topics:
Temple preparation, Levitical organization, military administration, royal succession
Audience:
Bible study participants
Note:
Year
Year:
2016
Region / City:
Ziklag, Hebron
Topic:
Biblical History
Document Type:
Lesson
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Students of the Bible
Period of Validity:
September 20, 2016
Date of Approval:
September 20, 2016
Note:
Year
Theme:
Child development, Early Years Education
Document type:
Progress Check
Target audience:
Parents, caregivers, childcare providers
Contextual description:
A progress check document assessing the developmental milestones of a child at age two, focusing on key areas such as communication, physical, social, and emotional development, completed by the childcare provider.
Year:
2016
Region / City:
Wisconsin
Topic:
Background Check Consent
Document Type:
Form
Organization / Institution:
Wisconsin Department of Administration
Author:
Wisconsin Department of Administration
Target Audience:
Job applicants in Wisconsin
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2020
Region / City:
European Space Agency
Topic:
Space Technology, Business Incubation
Document Type:
Guideline
Organization / Institution:
European Space Agency Business Incubation Centres (ESA BICs)
Author:
European Space Agency
Target Audience:
Entrepreneurs, Start-ups, ESA BIC Applicants
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
23/06/2020
Modification Date:
30/09/2022
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters