№ lp_1_2_33146
File format: docx
Character count: 4758
File size: 52 KB
This is a product datasheet detailing the specifications and features of the 8ch AI Box (AIB) for IP and analog video surveillance systems, offering AI analytics and advanced object detection capabilities.
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Global
Subject:
Video Surveillance
Document Type:
Product Datasheet
Organization:
Hanwha Vision
Author:
Hanwha Vision
Target Audience:
Security professionals, System integrators
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Revision Date:
N/A
Note:
Context
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Energy certificates, transaction services
Document type:
Contract
Institution:
AIB (Association of Issuing Bodies)
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
AIB Hub Participants, Market Participants
Effective period:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Note:
Contextual description
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Clinical Study Documentation
Document Type:
Instructional Template
Institution / Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Study Teams, Clinical Researchers
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Maine
Topic:
Politics, Healthcare, Social Security, Abortion
Document Type:
Political Ad/Press Release
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Voters, Political Constituents, General Public
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Global
Theme:
Video Surveillance, Security Systems
Document Type:
Product Specification
Organization / Institution:
Hanwha Techwin
Author:
Hanwha Techwin
Target Audience:
Security system integrators, specifiers
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Revision Date:
Not specified
Year:
2016
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Video Surveillance, Electronic Safety and Security
Document Type:
Product Specification
Organization / Institution:
Hanwha Techwin
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Security System Installers, Specifiers
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Manufacturer:
Hanwha Techwin
Website:
http://www.hanwha-security.com/
Product Type:
4K AI Box Type IP Video Camera
Video Compression:
H.265, H.264, MJPEG
Standards Compliance:
ISO/IEC 23008-2:2013, ISO/IEC 14496–10, ISO/IEC 10918, ONVIF Profile S/G/T, FCC, ANSI, ICES, EMC-Directive 2014/30/EU, EN 55032, EN 50130-4, VCCI-CISPR 32, AS/NZS CISPR32, UL, CE EN 50581
Specification Reference:
CSI MasterFormat 2014 and 2016 (Division 28 – Electronic Safety and Security)
Warranty:
Minimum 3 years
Installation:
Authorized installer required
Camera Model:
PNB-A9001
Features:
Multi-streaming, WiseStream technology, DORI detection standard, Dynamic GOV, Multi-exposure WDR, Dynamic fps
Note:
Year
Note:
Year
Organization / institution:
Texas A&M University-Kingsville
Contextual description:
A template for a thesis or dissertation submission at Texas A&M University-Kingsville, including guidelines for abstract, dedication, acknowledgements, contributors, funding sources, and the table of contents structure.
Note:
Year
Topic:
Creative Writing & Literature
Document type:
Thesis
Institution:
Harvard University
Author:
Author’s Name
Target audience:
Graduate students, researchers
Year:
Not applicable
Region / City:
Not applicable
Subject:
Research Procedures Documentation
Document Type:
Manual of Procedures (MOP) / Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Research teams, study staff
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / country:
Canada
Subject:
Phytosanitary certification for box tree moth (Cydalima perspectalis)
Document type:
Certification standard
Organization / institution:
CNCI (Canadian Nursery Certification Institute)
Regulatory body:
CFIA (Canadian Food Inspection Agency)
Target audience:
Nursery operators and facilities participating in Clean Plants program
Reference documents:
CFIA directive D-22-04, ISPM 4, ISPM 10, RSPM 24, RSPM 28
Certification module:
Box Tree Moth (BTM) Pest Module
Funding:
AgriAssurance Program, Canadian Agricultural Partnership
Application procedure:
Details for both existing and new Clean Plants participants
Version:
BTMCS-2023-03-A