№ files_lp_3_process_9_73197
File format: docx
Character count: 1374
File size: 23 KB
The document outlines the approved tax rates for the Town of Dalton for the fiscal year 2026, providing detailed information on changes in property tax rates, exemptions, and payment procedures.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Dalton, Massachusetts
Topic:
Tax rates and assessments
Document Type:
Tax Information
Organization / Institution:
Town of Dalton
Author:
Board of Assessors
Target Audience:
Taxpayers of Dalton
Period of Validity:
FY 2026
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Huddersfield, UK
Theme:
Residential Development, Construction
Document Type:
Tender Request
Client:
Stonewater Developments Ltd.
Architect:
Vaughan Architecture Ltd.
Target Audience:
Contractors, Construction Companies
Project Type:
Design & Build
Anticipated Completion Date:
Late 2024
Start Date:
December 2023
Tender Period:
6 Weeks
Site Location:
Rear of 11 Holme Avenue, Dalton, Huddersfield
Project Details:
22 new build houses, refurbishment of a bungalow
Building Type:
Detached and semi-detached houses, 2 and 3 storeys
Energy Features:
Thermal performance, PV cells, air source heat pumps
Construction Phases:
Design & Build, RIBA stage 4 complete
Regulations:
CDM, Building Regulations, Warranty approvals
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Lawrence, Kansas
Subject:
Research Funding
Document Type:
Guideline
Institution:
University of Kansas
Author:
Jie Zhang
Target Audience:
Faculty, Research Staff, Postdoctoral Fellows, Graduate/Undergraduate Students
Period of Validity:
FY2026
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Date:
June 11, 2025
Region / City:
Shelby County, Tennessee
Topic:
Budget Planning, Finance, and Fiscal Year Allocations
Document Type:
Meeting Agenda
Organ / Institution:
Shelby County Board of Commissioners
Author:
Shelby County Board of Commissioners
Target Audience:
County commissioners, financial officers, public officials
Period of Validity:
Fiscal Year 2026
Approval Date:
June 11, 2025
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Kingston, Massachusetts
Theme:
Real Estate Tax Billing, Municipal Liens
Document Type:
Letter
Authority / Organization:
Town of Kingston, Office of the Tax Collector
Author:
Kenneth G. Moalli, Tax Collector; Debora Barry, Assistant Collector
Target Audience:
Attorneys, Financial Institutions, Property Owners
Period of Validity:
Fiscal Year 2026
Approval Date:
July 1, 2025
Date of Changes:
None
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Illinois
Topic:
College Substance Use
Document Type:
Survey
Institution:
Illinois Institutions
Author:
Illinois Higher Education Consortium (IHEC)
Target Audience:
Higher education institutions in Illinois
Period of Activity:
Late winter/early spring 2026
Approval Date:
Not specified
Revision Date:
2025
Grant Program Name:
Partnership for Reading Success – Massachusetts (PRISM) III
Track:
Track 1
Fiscal Year:
FY2026
Year of Grant:
Year 1
Funding Period:
July 1, 2025 – August 31, 2025
Fund Code:
0594
Issuing Organization:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Grant Type:
State education grant
Subject Area:
ELA/Literacy
Eligible Recipients:
Local Education Agencies and LEA consortia
Purpose of Funding:
Procurement of high-quality ELA/Literacy curricular materials and related implementation supports
Covered Costs:
Educator stipends, substitute coverage, curricular materials, leadership coaching
Curricular Standards Reference:
CURATE review standards alignment and classroom application ratings
Maximum Funding Amount:
$400,000 per LEA/consortium for curricular materials
Implementation Timeline:
FY2026–FY2028, pending funding availability and performance
Approval Requirement:
All purchases require prior approval by DESE
Administrative System Referenced:
GEM$ budgeting system
Year:
FY2026
Region / City:
Georgia
Topic:
Family and Children Services
Document Type:
Application Form
Organization / Institution:
Georgia Department of Human Services, Division of Family and Children Services
Author:
Georgia Department of Human Services
Target Audience:
Applicants for funding in FY2026
Period of Validity:
FY2026
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Year:
2026
Note:
Region / City
Topic:
Training Courses for CACFP Institutions
Document Type:
Training Resource
Organization / Institution:
OSDE Connect
Target Audience:
CACFP Institutions
Period of Action:
FY2026
Context:
A list of training courses for CACFP institutions, including course details, credits, and update schedule.
Year:
2026
Region / city:
Not specified
Topic:
Research grant application
Document type:
Application form
Organization / institution:
ALMA
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Researchers applying for ALMA research grants
Period of validity:
FY2026
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2026-2027
Region / City:
Tinton Falls, New Jersey
Topic:
Organizational Leadership
Document Type:
Directory
Organization:
The Arc of New Jersey
Author:
Lauren Zalepka, Marnie McNany, Karen Santiago, Andy Sharick, Pamela Corrigan, Kevin Sturges, S. Paul Prior, Charles Pinto, Joanne Bergin, Ruby Goyal-Carkeek, Kathy Mullery, Jennifer Mudd, Michael Prendergast, Céline Fortin
Target Audience:
Members of The Arc of New Jersey, staff, and partners
Effective Period:
FY2026-2027
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Salt Lake City
Topic:
Brownfield Cleanup, Environmental Protection
Document Type:
Public Notice
Author:
Housing Authority of Salt Lake City
Target Audience:
General Public
Period of Action:
January 12, 2026 - January 26, 2026
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Context:
Public notice announcing a meeting for community input on a Brownfield Cleanup Grant application for the Pacific Northwest Pipeline Building renovation project.
Year:
2026
Note:
Region / City
Topic:
Grant Application, Organizational Leadership
Document Type:
Grant Application Form
Target Audience:
Organizations applying for FY2026 Creative Capacity Grant
Effective Period:
FY2026
Context Description:
Form used for collecting detailed information about the executive leadership, governing board, organizational changes, and grant-related updates for the FY2026 Creative Capacity Grant.
Year:
2026
Program:
Creative Capacity Grant
Target Audience:
Nonprofit arts organizations applying for grant funding
Document Type:
Guidance / Instructional Document
Organization:
National Endowment for the Arts (implied)
Content Focus:
Grant application narrative questions, organizational information, program development, leadership, community engagement
Application Level:
Levels 1-5
Word Limits:
Specified per question
Submission Method:
Online application platform
Year:
FY2026
Region / City:
United States
Theme:
Project Management, Research, Education, Extension
Document Type:
Template
Institution:
USDA
Author:
AFRI
Target Audience:
Researchers, Educators, Extension Specialists
Period of Validity:
Ongoing throughout project duration
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
United States
Theme:
Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration Appropriations
Document Type:
Community Project Request Form
Organization / Institution:
Office of Congresswoman Deborah Ross
Author:
Congresswoman Deborah Ross
Target Audience:
Members of Congress, Organizations submitting community projects
Effective Period:
FY2026
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Tokyo
Theme:
Interdisciplinary Collaborative Research
Document Type:
Application Form
Institution:
Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo
Author:
Applicant (Representative)
Target Audience:
Researchers, Collaborators
Research Period:
From MM/DD/YYYY to MM/DD/YYYY
Approval Date:
MM/DD/YYYY
Date of Changes:
N/A
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2022
Event:
3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 Meeting #118
Location:
Online
Topic:
Coarse UE location information format and reporting mechanism
Document type:
Meeting report / technical discussion
Organization:
3GPP
Author:
Thales
Agenda item:
6.10.1.1
Deadline for feedback:
2022-05-19 08:00 UTC
Deadline for rapporteur summary:
2022-05-19 10:00 UTC
Proposals for agreement by session chair:
2022-05-19 20:00 UTC
Year:
2020
Region / city:
Johns Hopkins University
Topic:
Coronavirus, Medical Research, Virus Characteristics
Document type:
Informational Article
Organization / institution:
Johns Hopkins University
Author:
Irene Ken
Target audience:
General Public, Researchers
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Date of approval:
4/3/2020
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Eastern
Theme:
Conference, Faculty Information
Document Type:
Conference Guide
Organization / Institution:
Write His Answer Ministries
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Faculty
Effective Date:
July 25, 2025
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Context:
A guide for faculty members attending the Write His Answer 2025 conference, including details on sign-in procedures, tech checks, conference schedule, and waiver agreement.