№ lp_1_2_22663
File format: docx
Character count: 9626
File size: 561 KB
Post-operative care after orthognathic surgery, detailing the procedures, recovery expectations, and patient follow-up with their dentist.
Year:
2022
Region / City:
King’s Lynn
Topic:
Orthognathic Surgery
Document Type:
Informational Guide
Organization / Institution:
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King’s Lynn NHS Foundation Trust
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Patients undergoing orthognathic surgery
Period of Effectiveness:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2024
Note:
Region / City
Topic:
Stormwater Management
Document Type:
Template
Organization / Institution:
CDOT
Target Audience:
Contractors, Engineers, Project Managers
Description:
Template for developing a Stormwater Management Plan for construction sites with less than one acre of disturbance, focusing on stormwater controls and environmental compliance.
Year:
N/A
Region / City:
Maryland
Theme:
Education, Gifted and Talented Program
Document Type:
Policy
Institution:
Maryland Public Schools
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Teachers, School Teams, Administrators
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Context:
A policy document outlining the process for identifying and recommending students for Gifted and Talented services in Maryland schools, specifically in Grades 3 and 4, based on various assessments and data points.
Year:
2019
Country:
United States
Agency:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Office:
Office of Procurement, Acquisition and Logistics, Strategic Acquisition Center
Document type:
Justification and Approval Notice
Subject:
Extension of services for hospital beds for home use and assemblies
Contract number:
VA797N-14-C-0015
Modification number:
P00016
Awardee:
Invacare Corporation, Home Care Division
Period of performance:
November 23, 2019 to January 22, 2020
Estimated value:
Approximately $2.4 million
Statutory authority:
41 U.S.C. § 3304(a)(1); FAR 6.302-1; 38 U.S.C. § 8123
Contract type:
Firm-Fixed-Price
Procurement method:
Other than full and open competition
NAICS code:
339113
Location:
Fredericksburg, Virginia
Contextual description:
Federal procurement justification documenting the approval to extend an existing sole-source contract for the supply and servicing of hospital beds and related accessories for eligible veterans’ home use during a defined interim period.
Year:
2021
Region / City:
European Union
Topic:
Cross-border marketing of EU AIFs
Document type:
Notification letter
Author:
European Commission
Target audience:
AIFMs, regulatory bodies, financial institutions
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Year:
2014
Region / city:
Geneva
Subject:
Assessing uniformity by off-types
Document type:
Report
Organization / institution:
International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV)
Author:
UPOV Office
Target audience:
UPOV members and experts in plant variety assessment
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Mental Health, Cultural Dynamics, Faith and Work
Document Type:
Assignment
Organization / Institution:
Grand Canyon University
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Mental Health Workers, Students of Mental Health
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / city:
-
Theme:
Research Paper Submission Guidelines
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
CRC-SPAST
Author:
John Doe, Smith Jones, Ananva Sharma
Target Audience:
Authors submitting to CRC-SPAST
Period of Validity:
-
Approval Date:
-
Date of Changes:
-
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Travel Services, App Development, Tourism
Document Type:
Press Release
Organization / Institution:
Airbnb
Author:
Brian Chesky
Target Audience:
Travelers, Airbnb Users, Service Providers
Effective Period:
2025 and beyond
Approval Date:
2025
Modification Date:
Ongoing updates
Note:
Year
Topic:
Garnishment procedure, legal responsibilities of garnishee
Document Type:
Legal Instruction
Authority / Institution:
Court of Arizona
Target Audience:
Garnishees involved in legal proceedings
Year:
2024
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Cybersecurity and Anti-virus Software Certification
Document Type:
Compliance Requirement
Organization / Institution:
Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Author:
FCC
Target Audience:
Telecommunications Certification Bodies (TCBs), Equipment Manufacturers
Period of Validity:
From July 23, 2024
Approval Date:
July 23, 2024
Date of Amendments:
None
Document type:
Justification and approval template
Legal basis:
Energy Policy Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. § 8256); FAR 6.302-5; FAR 6.304; 10 U.S.C. § 2913
Subject matter:
Non-competitive procurement for Utility Energy Service Contracts
Sector:
Public procurement and energy management
Applicable contract vehicles:
Utility Energy Service Contract; GSA Areawide Contract; Basic Ordering Agreement
Responsible entities:
Federal agencies; contracting offices; serving distribution utilities
Geographic scope:
United States
Intended use:
Federal acquisition approval process
Regulatory framework:
Federal Acquisition Regulation
Associated activities:
Energy efficiency; water conservation; demand management
Approval requirements:
Technical certification; legal review; contracting officer certification; approving official authorization
Source type:
Government procurement justification
Year:
2024
Region / city:
Australia and New Zealand
Topic:
Refrigerant handling, refrigeration systems, air conditioning
Document type:
Code of Practice
Organ / institution:
AIRAH, Australian Refrigeration Council (ARC), Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW)
Author:
AIRAH, ARC, DCCEEW
Target audience:
Industry professionals, public, refrigeration and air conditioning contractors
Validity period:
Until August 19, 2024
Approval date:
2024
Amendment date:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Legal Analysis
Document Type:
Memorandum
Author:
Cory Bates-Rogers
Target Audience:
Legal professionals
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Georgia
Topic:
Afterschool care services
Document Type:
Proposal
Agency / Institution:
Georgia Division of Family and Children Services (DFCS)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Non-profit agencies applying for funding
Period of Action:
FFY 2021
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Context:
A proposal for non-profit agencies seeking funding for the DFCS Afterschool Care Program, outlining the required documentation and funding structure.
Year:
20__
Note:
Region/City
Document Type:
Project Study Report
Year:
2020
Region / City:
European Space Agency
Topic:
Space Technology, Business Incubation
Document Type:
Guideline
Organization / Institution:
European Space Agency Business Incubation Centres (ESA BICs)
Author:
European Space Agency
Target Audience:
Entrepreneurs, Start-ups, ESA BIC Applicants
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
23/06/2020
Modification Date:
30/09/2022
Note:
Study Summary 1.1 Please provide a brief summary of the study in the table below. A complete description of the study with detailed information should be provided in the body of the protocol. For sections not applicable to the study, mark them as N/A. Study Title Study Design Primary Objective/Purpose Secondary Objective(s)/Purposes Research Intervention(s) ClinicalTrials.gov NCT # Study Population Sample Size Study Duration for individual subjects Study Specific Abbreviations/ Definitions
Background 3.1 Provide the scientific or scholarly background for, rationale for, and significance of the research based on the existing literature and how will it add to existing knowledge. :
this section should be limited to only information directly related to the research questions and objectives. Do not include your full dissertation proposal. 3.2 Describe any relevant preliminary data (e.g. pilot data).
Procedures Involved 5.1 Describe and explain the study design. 5.2 Please select the methods that will be employed in this study (select all that apply):
☐ Audio/Video Recording ☐ Psychophysiological Recording ☐ Behavioral Interventions ☐ Record Review - Educational ☐ Behavioral Observations and Experimentations ☐ Record Review - Employee ☐ Deception ☐ Record Review- Medical ☐ Focus Groups ☐ Record Review - Other ☐ Interviews ☐ Specimen Collection or Analysis ☐ Investigational Medical Device – (e.g. Medical Mobile Applications) ☐ Surveys and/or Questionnaires ☐Psychometric Testing ☐ Other Social-Behavioral Procedures Provide a description of all research procedures being performed and when they are performed. (Upload any surveys, questionnaires, interview scripts, focus group scripts, debriefing scripts, psychometric tests, stimulus materials, intervention manuals, and data collection forms on the Local Site Documents page in the IRB application.) 5.3 Describe the procedures or interventions that are going to be conducted as part of the research project, but that would have been conducted anyway, even if the research was not occurring (i.e. standard of care procedures, activities that would occur in a classroom). 5.4 Describe the procedures performed to lessen the probability or magnitude of risks of items selected in 5.2.5. 5 If accessing or collecting existing data, describe: The data that will be collected during the study (e.g. demographics, medical history, etc.). Attach the data capture sheet(s) on the Local Site Documents page in the IRB application. How the data will be obtained, including how you have the authority to access the data. The source or location of the data (e.g. USF Epic, TGH Epic, Hillsborough County School records, CANVAS records, publicly available databases, etc.). 5.6 If collecting and/or analyzing biological specimens, describe: How the biological specimens will be or have been collected. How the biological specimens will be stored. How long the biological specimens will be stored. How the biological specimens will be used. The laboratories that will be used. Whether the collected biological specimens will undergo genetic testing. If so, indicate if this study is part of a Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) and whether the data will be forwarded to the NIH dbGaP. 5.7 If there are plans for long-term follow-up (once all research related procedures are complete), what data will be collected during this period.
Data and Specimen Storage for Future Research 6.1 If data or specimens will be banked for future research studies, describe where the data or specimens will be stored, how long it/they will b:
the process to request a release, approvals required for release, who can obtain data or specimens, and the data to be provided with specimens.
Note:
Year
Topic:
Music composition, music education
Document type:
Writing guidelines
Target audience:
Students, music enthusiasts