№ files_lp_4_process_2_44192
File format: docx
Character count: 19531
File size: 36 KB
Rick shares his personal story of coming to terms with his identity and the challenges he faced being gay in the 1990s, highlighting the intersection of personal agency, discrimination, and collective activism within the context of the LGBTQ movement and AIDS crisis.
Year:
1990s
Region / City:
United States
Theme:
Personal agency, LGBTQ rights, AIDS, discrimination, and activism
Document Type:
Audio narration
Organization / Institution:
ACT-UP
Author:
Rick
Target Audience:
General public, LGBTQ community, individuals interested in social justice and history
Period of Action:
1994-2000
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Lebanon, Tennessee
Theme:
Infrastructure, Safety Improvements, Economic Development
Document Type:
Official Statement
Organization / Institution:
Lebanon City Council
Author:
Mayor Rick Bell
Target Audience:
Citizens of Lebanon
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
April 1, 2023
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Sarasota, FL
Topic:
Journalism, Television News
Document Type:
Resume
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Rick Adams
Target Audience:
Potential Employers, News Stations
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Lebanon
Theme:
Winter Storm Response, City Development, Community Events
Document Type:
Official Update
Organization / Institution:
City of Lebanon
Author:
Mayor Rick Bell
Target Audience:
Local Residents, City Officials, Community Stakeholders
Effective Period:
January 2026
Approval Date:
January 20, 2026
Modification Date:
January 23, 2026
Note:
Context
Year:
2025
Region / City:
North Carolina
Topic:
Contest Rules, Firearm Regulations
Document Type:
Contest Rules
Organization:
Rick Herrema Foundation (RHF)
Author:
Rick Herrema Foundation
Target Audience:
Individuals eligible for firearms ownership
Period of Validity:
Until the Grand Prize is won
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2016
Organization:
Virginia Juvenile Justice Association (VJJA)
Recipient:
Rick Teague
Role:
Court Psychologist, 29th District Court Service Unit
Position in Association:
Scholarship Chair, Conference Faculty, Institute Planning Committee Member
Membership Duration:
Since February 1979
Event Date:
November 10, 2016
Event Type:
Annual Meeting
Award Type:
Lifetime Membership
Presenter:
Beth Stinnett, Past President
Region:
Virginia, USA
Year:
2024
Region / City:
District 20, District 5, District 9, Area 6, Area 8, Area 19
Topic:
Alcoholics Anonymous, General Service, Conferences, Area Assemblies
Document Type:
Meeting Minutes
Organization:
Alcoholics Anonymous
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Members of Alcoholics Anonymous, GSRs, Area Officers
Period of Validity:
January 2024 - March 2024
Approval Date:
January 2024
Date of Changes:
February 2024
Year:
2022
Award Name:
Rick Kamuf Agri-Business of the Year Award
Organizing Body:
Greater Owensboro Chamber of Commerce
Event:
Annual Celebration
Region / City:
Greater Owensboro area, Owensboro, Kentucky
Type of Document:
Award nomination form
Eligibility Criteria:
Active business in Greater Owensboro area; Chamber member in good standing; minimum five years in business; no Chamber Business of the Year award within past five years
Submission Deadline:
November 12, 2022 at 12:00 PM
Submission Method:
Email or hand delivery
Contact Email:
[email protected]
Submission Address:
200 East Third Street, Owensboro, KY 42303
Year:
2000s
Region / Country:
USA
Theme:
Partner dance, choreography
Document Type:
Dance instruction sheet
Choreographer:
Rick Bates & Deborah Bates
Music:
Beautiful Day - Rick Trevino
Target Audience:
Dancers familiar with partner dance steps
Level:
Partner
Positions:
Double Hand Hold, Open Promenade, Left/Right Open Promenade
Steps Included:
Cross rock, triple step, pivot, shuffle, sugar foot, military pivot, turning triple step
End Position:
Original dance hold orientation maintained throughout
Year:
2015
Team:
Denver Broncos
Topic:
American football, offensive strategy
Document type:
Press conference transcript
Position:
Offensive Coordinator
Speaker:
Rick Dennison
Audience:
Media, fans
Event date:
September 23, 2015
Season week:
3
Players mentioned:
Peyton Manning, Emmanuel Sanders, Demaryius Thomas, Andre Caldwell, Jordan Norwood, Cody Latimer
Game context:
Early season performance and offensive assessment
Note:
Year
Author:
LT Rick J Holt
System Components:
Propeller, Feather Button, Electrical Components, Electronic Governor, Protective Devices
Context:
Technical manual related to the operation, components, and protective mechanisms of a propeller system.
Note:
Year
Subject:
Fire Safety in Construction
Document Type:
Guidance
Organization / Institution:
Home Builders Federation (HBF)
Author:
Home Builders Federation (HBF)
Target Audience:
HBF members
Note:
Year
Contextual description:
A technical document outlining the structure, mapping, and required formats for Service Responses and Device Alerts in the context of GBCS Payload and MMC Output formats.
Year:
2013
Region / City:
North America
Subject:
Commercial printing standards
Document type:
Technical standard
Author:
Ron Ellis, Joe Fazzi, Don Hutcheson
Target audience:
Printers, designers, print buyers
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
2013
Date of changes:
2013
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Papua New Guinea
Topic:
Data Capture, Health Information Systems
Document Type:
Workshop Agenda
Organization:
CHSPNG Health Services & Programs
Author:
Jerry Kaino, Data Processing Officer
Target Audience:
Healthcare workers involved in Health Managers, Health Information Officer, Data Entry Officer, HEO
Duration:
6 hours
Year:
2025
Region / City:
British Columbia
Topic:
Human Rights Tribunal procedures and case management
Document Type:
Checklist
Organ / Institution:
British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Counsel representing complainants or respondents before the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal
Period of Effect:
2025-2026
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
November 15, 2024
Instructor:
Marcus Chatfield, MSc, PhD
Email:
[email protected]
Course Type:
Experiential Learning Course
Credits:
1
Delivery Mode:
Asynchronous Online
Class Numbers:
27008 & 27011, Sections REO2 and RUFON
Institution:
University of Florida
Prerequisites:
Liberal Arts and Sciences student
Required Materials:
Thomas S. Mullaney and Christopher Rea, Where Research Begins: Choosing a Research Project That Matters to You (University of Chicago Press, 2022)
Office Hours:
Tuesdays 12:00 to 1:30, by appointment on Bookings
Office Location:
Turlington 1120-H (Zoom for UF Online students)
Phone:
352-294-2864
Semester:
Spring 2026
Assessment:
Research Resource Report, Annotated Bibliography, Project Description and Research Question, Research Record, Readings and Discussions, Research Proposal
Instructor:
Bob Choquette
E-Mail:
[email protected]
Phone:
541.346.3851
Office Location / Hours:
106 Hendricks: Mondays and Thursdays 10:00 – 11:00 am
Class Days and Time:
Tuesdays and Thursdays: 12 noon – 1:20 pm
Class Location:
302 Gerlinger
GE:
Dani Dolphin
Office Location:
EMU 2nd floor student lounge
Office Hours:
Tuesdays and Thursdays: 1:30 – 2:50 pm
Year:
2025
Region / City:
United States, University of Oregon
Topic:
Nonprofit Sector, Education
Document Type:
Syllabus
Author:
Bob Choquette
Target Audience:
University students
Period of Validity:
Fall 2025
Date of Approval:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Religious studies, Meditation
Document Type:
Study guide
Institution / Organization:
Harvestime International Network
Author:
A.W. Tozer
Target Audience:
Christians seeking to understand Biblical meditation
Period of Validity:
Indefinite
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters