№ files_lp_3_process_7_100510
File format: docx
Character count: 2371
File size: 15 KB
This document is an application form for a scholarship aimed at women who have had a break in their education and are now pursuing an undergraduate or graduate degree.
Year:
2016-2017
Region / City:
South Bend, Indiana
Subject:
Scholarship Application
Document Type:
Application Form
Institution:
Tri Kappa, Epsilon Lambda Chapter
Author:
Kris Monagle
Target Audience:
Female students, 25 years and older, with a break in education
Period of Validity:
2016-2017
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Alabaster, Alabama
Topic:
Public Procurement / Vehicle Purchase
Document Type:
Request for Bids
Organization / Institution:
City of Alabaster
Author:
City of Alabaster Police Department
Target Audience:
Potential Bidders
Period of Validity:
Until September 3, 2024
Approval Date:
August 18, 2024
Amendment Date:
Not provided
Issuing authority:
City of Alabaster
Department:
Office of Purchasing Agent; Alabaster Police Department
Document type:
Request for Bids
Subject:
Procurement of police pursuit vehicle
Vehicle specification:
2026 Chevrolet Tahoe PPV, 2WD, 4 door, or equivalent/better
Jurisdiction:
Alabaster, Alabama, United States
Bid posting date:
September 14, 2025
Bid opening date and time:
October 7, 2025 at 10:00 AM
Bid submission deadline:
October 7, 2025 at 10:00 AM
Applicable law:
Alabama Code §§41-16-50 et seq.; §§31-13-1 et seq.; §31-13-9
Eligibility requirement:
Enrollment in E-Verify program
Contact person:
Lt. Jeremy Medlin
Contact email:
[email protected]
Contact phone:
(205) 664-7401
Bid submission location:
City of Alabaster, 1953 Municipal Way, Ste. 201, Alabaster, AL 35007
Authorized official:
J. Mark Frey, City Clerk
Year:
2020
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
National Security Law
Document Type:
Syllabus
Organization / Institution:
University of Houston
Author:
Dycus et al.
Target Audience:
Students of Law
Period of Validity:
Fall Semester
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2014
Region / City:
Global
Theme:
Game Design, Puzzle, Horror, Suspense
Document Type:
Game Design Document
Author:
Alfred Kishek, Antonio Costea, Omar El-Haik, Grant Sweeney, Jonathan Hood
Target Audience:
Mature players, gamers familiar with first-person shooters
Period of Effect:
2014 - Present
Approval Date:
December 14th, 2014
Modification Date:
None specified
Context:
This document is a game design outline detailing the development of a demo version of the maze game, including gameplay mechanics, story, and project scope.
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Seattle
Subject:
Equitable Transit Oriented Development, Remnant Parcels, Technical Consultant
Document Type:
Request for Proposals (RFP)
Author:
City of Seattle, Office of Planning & Community Development (OPCD)
Target Audience:
Consultants, Government Agencies, Transit Development Stakeholders
Period of Validity:
February 24, 2024 - May 16, 2024
Date of Approval:
February 24, 2024
Date of Changes:
None specified
Year:
2018
Location:
United States
Topic:
Christian Worship and Spiritual Pursuit
Document Type:
Sermon Discussion Guide
Author:
Pastor Dave Patterson
Target Audience:
Small group Bible study participants
Dates of Event:
March 3-4, 2018
Scriptural References:
Romans 5:8; John 6:44; Jeremiah 31:3; Matthew 5:6; James 4:8; Jeremiah 29:13; Psalm 25:3; Luke 11:9; Psalm 42:1-5; Psalm 42:11; Psalm 72:18-20
Content Focus:
Spiritual longing, pursuit of God, worship practices, reflection questions for group discussion
Year:
2026
Region / City:
International / unspecified
Topic:
Religious meditation, theological reflection
Document Type:
Book excerpt
Institution / Organization:
Independent publication
Author:
Unspecified
Target Audience:
Readers interested in biblical studies and Christian theology
Chapters:
Preface, Prejudice Against God, The Will of God, Prejudice Against Truth, Questions Stated Clearly, The Hebrew Message from God (Parts I & II), The Greek Message from God, The Meaning of the Message, An Invitation
Bibliography:
Included
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
North Karanpura
Theme:
Price breakdown for construction and engineering services
Document Type:
Contract / Tender
Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Contractors and service providers in the construction and engineering field
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2007
Region / city:
England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales
Subject:
Adoption, Fostering, Health Assessment
Document type:
Health Report
Organization:
Agency responsible for adoption and fostering
Author:
Unknown
Target audience:
Prospective adoptive parents, foster carers, GP
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / city:
Manchester
Topic:
Property law, Lease disputes
Document type:
Judgment
Court / institution:
High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts in Manchester
Author:
Judge Hodge QC
Target audience:
Legal professionals, Property lawyers, Academics
Period of validity:
2021
Approval date:
1 April 2021
Date of changes:
None
Year:
2007
Region / city:
British Columbia
Topic:
Dam Safety, Flood Inundation, Consequence Classification
Document Type:
Guideline
Institution:
Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Dam safety officers, engineers, dam owners
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Year:
20XX
Keywords:
A; B; C; D; F
Type:
Review/Research Article
Corresponding Author:
[email protected]
Date Received:
XX Month 20XX
Date Accepted:
XX Month 20XX
Date Published:
XX Month 20XX
Institution:
Name of Institution, Country
Author 1:
Firstnames Lastname
Author 2:
Abcd E. Ghij
Author 3:
Klmn Opqr
Author 4:
Stuv Wx Yz4
References:
[1] Ogheneochuko Ubrurhe et al., "A Review of Energy Efficiency in Wireless Body Area/Sensor Networks", Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1 Jan 2020, DOI: 10.33166/AETiC.2020.01.001
Form number:
RHW25
Jurisdiction:
Wales
Country:
United Kingdom
Legislation:
Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016
Related legislation:
Housing (Wales) Act 2014; Housing Act 2004; Renting Homes (Fees etc.) (Wales) Act 2019
Document type:
Statutory notice form
Subject:
Termination of fixed term standard occupation contract under landlord’s break clause
Notice period:
Minimum two months
Parties:
Landlord; Contract-holder(s)
Property:
Dwelling subject to occupation contract
Grounds:
Exercise of landlord’s break clause under section 194(1)
Restrictions:
Sections 194, 196, 197, 198, 200 and 217 of the Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016
Court involvement:
Possession claim required if dwelling not vacated
Intended recipients:
Contract-holders of fixed term standard contracts with two-month minimum notice period
Note:
Year
Year:
2024-2025
Region / City:
Australia, New Zealand
Topic:
Promotion Terms and Conditions
Document Type:
Terms and Conditions
Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Australian and New Zealand residents aged 18+
Validity Period:
November 14, 2024 - March 28, 2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Program Name:
Gary E. Everhardt Park Break Program
Project Title:
Physical and Programmatic Accessibility Assessment
Location:
Reconstruction Era National Historical Park, Beaufort, South Carolina
Dates:
May 14–21, 2023
Application Deadline:
March 10, 2023
Organizing Institutions:
The Institute for Parks at Clemson University; George Wright Society; U.S. National Park Service (NPS)
Host Site:
Reconstruction Era National Historical Park (REER)
Eligibility:
Currently enrolled MA/MS and PhD candidates
Academic Requirement:
Graduate students only
Objective:
Assessment of facility improvements required under the Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) and review of park programs and interpretive media for accessibility
Submission Contact:
Bob Powell ([email protected]
Note:
)
Required Applicant Information:
Personal details; educational background; advisor information; thesis/dissertation topic; gender identity; racial identity; applicant statement (300 words or less); referral source
Relevant Legislation:
Architectural Barriers Act (ABA)
Document Type:
Program application form