№ lp_1_2_47372
File format: docx
Character count: 3279
File size: 80 KB
Checklist-style regulatory guidance outlining required analyses, documentation, and mitigation planning elements for development projects affecting shoreline ecological functions to demonstrate no net loss.
Document type:
Regulatory guidance checklist
Topic:
Shoreline ecological functions and habitat mitigation
Intended use:
Project review and permitting support
Target audience:
Project applicants and environmental consultants
Regulatory context:
Shoreline management and mitigation sequencing
Key requirements:
Impact avoidance, minimization, rectification, compensation, monitoring
Mitigation elements:
Performance standards, contingency planning, financial assurance, permanent protection
Administrative oversight:
Shoreline administrator
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Port Hadlock, Washington
Topic:
Environmental monitoring and inspection report
Document Type:
Inspection Report
Organization / Institution:
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Northwest
Author:
Brooke Haines (EA Geologist), David Nelson (EA Task Order Manager)
Target Audience:
Department of the Navy, contractors, environmental engineers
Effective Period:
Summer 2020
Approval Date:
September 14, 2020
Amendment Date:
None
Note:
Contextual Description
Organization:
Shoreline Communications Inc.
Station:
WHVE-FM
Website:
www.ridingthewave.com
Document type:
Privacy Policy
Last updated:
8/29/17
Region:
United States
Contact address:
P.O. Box 927, Columbia, KY 42728
Contact email:
[email protected]
Contact person:
General Manager / Privacy Administrator
Applicable law:
United States law
Minimum age requirement:
18 years
Eligibility:
United States residents
Year:
2013
Region / City:
New York
Topic:
Coastal Erosion, Flooding, Shoreline Protection
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
USACE, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Coastal communities, policy makers, environmental planners
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Contextual Description:
A report detailing various coastal protection measures to mitigate erosion and flooding, including legal frameworks, zoning, and natural protective features.
Year:
2026
Region:
United States
Topic:
Conservation, Erosion Control
Document Type:
Conservation Practice Standard
Organization:
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Target Audience:
Landowners, Contractors, Conservation Planners
Purpose:
Stabilize and protect streambanks and shorelines of lakes, reservoirs, and estuaries
Scope:
Applies to natural or constructed channels and shorelines susceptible to erosion, excluding main ocean fronts and Great Lakes open shores
Reference:
NRCS Field Office Technical Guide, NEH Part 633, Chapter 26
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Northern Neck, Virginia
Topic:
Shoreline Protection, Environmental Conservation
Document Type:
Registration Form
Agency / Organization:
Virginia Cooperative Extension, Northern Neck Master Gardeners
Author:
Northern Neck Master Gardeners
Target Audience:
Waterfront homeowners in Northern Neck, Virginia
Period of Effect:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2014
Region / city:
Chesapeake Bay
Topic:
Shoreline Management, Erosion Control, Water Quality
Document Type:
Report
Organization / institution:
Chesapeake Bay Partnership, Center for Watershed Protection, EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office
Author:
Nathan Forand, Kevin DuBois, Jeff Halka, Scott Hardaway, George Janek, Lee Karrh, Eva Koch, Lewis Linker, Pam Mason, Ed Morgereth, Daniel Proctor, Kevin Smith, Bill Stack, Steve Stewart, Bill Wolinski
Target audience:
Researchers, Environmental Professionals, Policymakers
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
April 15, 2014
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Institution:
Shoreline Community College
Document Type:
Personnel requisition form
Departments Involved:
Human Resources, Finance, Executive Team
Position Types:
Classified, Faculty, Admin/Exempt
Funding Details:
Budget codes provided for each position
Approval Required:
Executive Team
Submission Method:
Digital form via email
Target Audience:
College staff and administrators
Requested Start Date:
Specified per position
Contract Period:
Specified per appointment type
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Shoreline, Washington
Theme:
Track and Field
Document Type:
Event Schedule
Organization / Institution:
King’s School
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Not specified
Period of Action:
2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
North Carolina, USA
Subject:
Shoreline Stabilization
Document Type:
Application Form
Organization / Institution:
North Carolina Department of Environment Quality, Division of Water Resources
Author:
Paul Wojoski
Target Audience:
Applicants for Shoreline Stabilization Permits
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Year:
Not specified
Region / Location:
Not specified
Subject:
Environmental monitoring of marine waste and endangered species
Document Type:
Monitoring log / Field record
Agency / Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Environmental compliance personnel
Observation Period:
Daily during discharge, with monthly photographic records
Monitored Species:
Steller sea lion, Steller’s eider, spectacled eider, northern sea otter, short-tailed albatross
Data Recorded:
Discharge/mixing zone, seafood waste, foam, film, sheen, tide cycle, animal observations, photograph reference numbers
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Jackson County, Texas
Subject:
Shoreline preservation and public access improvement
Document Type:
Notice to Bidders
Organization:
Commissioner’s Court of Jackson County
Project Number:
26-02
Location:
FM 616 Boat Ramp, Lolita, Texas
Bid Requirements:
Bid Bond 5% of proposed contract price, unit pricing, electronic or USB submission
Submission Deadline:
January 6, 2026, 2:00 pm
Specifications:
Available at https://fnimanager.freese.com/
Funding Source:
County funds
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Note:
and the site visit team chair eight (8) weeks prior to the site visit)(4.2024)
Year:
2024
Region / City:
N/A
Theme:
Accreditation
Document Type:
Schedule Template
Organization / Institution:
ARC-PA
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Program administrators, Site visit team
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2022
Organizations:
Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE), Silicon Valley Clean Energy (SVCE), East Bay Community Energy (EBCE)
Document Type:
Code Amendment Recommendations
Scope:
Residential and Nonresidential EV Charging Requirements
Version Dates:
May 11, 2022; July 8, 2022; September 2022; October 2022
Target Audience:
Local jurisdictions and code administrators
Reference:
2022 Title 24 Part 11 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen)
Topics:
EV Charging Stations, EV Ready Spaces, Direct Current Fast Charging, Automatic Load Management Systems, Multifamily and Nonresidential Buildings
URL:
BayAreaReachCodes.Org
Year:
2022
Region / city:
California
Theme:
Water Quality, Environmental Assessment
Document Type:
Technical Report
Organization / Institution:
Caltrans
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Environmental regulators, project managers
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Idaho
Topic:
Conservation, Big Game Species
Document Type:
Guideline
Agency:
Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG)
Author:
Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
Target Audience:
Wildlife managers, conservationists, land management authorities
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
New York State (NYS)
Theme:
Energy Storage Systems, Interconnection, Utility Practices
Document Type:
Industry Report
Organization:
Interconnection Technical Working Group (ITWG)
Author:
Industry Subgroup of ITWG
Target Audience:
Energy stakeholders, utility companies, developers
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
15 Feb 2023
Date of Updates:
29 Mar 2023, 14 Apr 2023, 13 Jun 2023
Year:
2015
Region / City:
NAIC Membership
Topic:
Continuing Education, Online Courses, Insurance, Risk Management
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organ / Institution:
NAIC
Author:
NAIC Membership
Target Audience:
Insurance professionals, CE providers
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
March 18, 2015
Date of Changes:
March 29, 2015
Note:
Context
Year:
2015
Region / city:
Geneva
Topic:
Human Rights, Migration, Border Control
Document Type:
Report
Author:
Maria Giovanna Manieri
Target Audience:
Civil society actors, policymakers, human rights organizations
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Event Date:
23 March 2015
Event Time:
13:00-15:00
Event Location:
Palais des Nations, Room XXI
Note:
Description
Year:
2013
Subject area:
Clinical trial protocols
Document type:
Checklist
Standard name:
SPIRIT 2013
Scope:
Interventional clinical trials
Content focus:
Protocol structure, methods, monitoring, and reporting items
Intended use:
Preparation and review of clinical trial protocols
Source type:
Reporting guideline