№ lp_2_3_35945
File format: docx
Character count: 5113
File size: 27 KB
Solicitation guidance outlining required components, priorities, and performance measurement expectations for FY24 applicants to the OJJDP Family Treatment Court Program.
Fiscal Year:
2024
Program:
OJJDP Family Treatment Court Program
Issuing Organization:
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP)
Developing Organization:
National Treatment Court Resource Center (NTCRC)
Document Type:
Solicitation Guidance / Program Narrative Outline
Subject:
Project Narrative Requirements for Grant Application
Target Applicants:
Jurisdictions and Applicant Organizations
Priority Areas:
Priority 1A; Priority 1B
Performance Reporting System:
JustGrants
Related Topics:
Youth and Family Partnerships; Performance Measurement; Equity and Access to Services
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Program Name:
OJJDP Tribal Juvenile Accountability Discretionary Grant Program (TJADG)
Administering Agency:
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP)
Department:
Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice
Document Type:
Performance measures grid and reporting guidelines
Purpose:
Reporting requirements and performance measurement framework for grantees
Reporting Tool:
OJJDP Performance Measurement Tool (PMT)
Submission System:
Grants Management System (GMS)
Reporting Frequency:
Annually
Program Categories:
19 program categories including Planning, Graduated Sanctions, Drug Courts, Restorative Justice, Reentry, and Indigent Defense
Data Formats:
Numeric data and narrative responses
Target Population:
Youth participating in OJJDP-funded programs
Required Measures:
OJJDP Core Measures including evidence-based programming, youth served, program completion, and short-term offending outcomes
Contact Information:
OJJDP-PMT Help Desk (1-866-487-0512; [email protected]
Note:
)
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Montpelier
Topic:
Community grants, funding eligibility, financial reporting
Document Type:
FAQ
Institution:
Montpelier Community Fund Board
Target Audience:
Non-profit organizations, individual artists, community groups
Period of Action:
FY24 (July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024)
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Greater Lowell Area, Massachusetts
Subject:
Youth Workforce Development Programs
Document Type:
Request for Proposals (RFP)
Issuing Organization:
MassHire Greater Lowell Workforce Board
Target Audience:
Public or private agencies, public school systems, community organizations, and other eligible applicants providing youth services
Period of Validity:
7/1/2022 – 6/30/2023 (with potential renewal)
Approval Date:
March 21, 2021
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Arizona
Topic:
Character education funding
Document Type:
Grant instructions
Organization / Institution:
Arizona Department of Education
Author:
Arizona Department of Education
Target Audience:
Local Education Agencies, schools
Period of validity:
2023-2024
Approval Date:
March 1, 2023
Amendment Date:
April 15, 2023
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Montpelier
Topic:
Community funding, grants
Document Type:
FAQ
Organization / Institution:
Montpelier City Council
Author:
Montpelier Community Fund Board
Target Audience:
Non-profit organizations, individual artists, community groups
Period of Validity:
Fiscal Year 2025 (July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025)
Approval Date:
June 2023
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2024
Region / City:
North Carolina
Subject:
In-Home Aide Monitoring, Home and Community Care Block Grant (HCCBG), ARPA funding
Document Type:
Instructional Guide
Agency / Organization:
North Carolina Division of Aging and Adult Services
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
AAA monitors, service providers
Period of Validity:
FY24
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Georgia
Topic:
Gang Activity Prosecution
Document Type:
Grant Application
Agency:
Georgia Emergency Management and Homeland Security Agency (GEMA/HS)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Law enforcement agencies, prosecuting attorneys, nonprofits focused on gang prosecution
Period of Validity:
9 November 2023 – 15 May 2024
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Description:
Grant application for the FY24 Georgia Gang Activity Prosecution Grant aimed at supporting gang activity prosecution in Georgia.
Year:
FY24
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Community Impact Grants
Document Type:
Grant Application
Organization:
CJP
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Nonprofits and organizations seeking funding
Period of Action:
FY24
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Fiscal year:
FY24
Timeframe:
July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024
Sector:
Education and public health
Focus area:
Substance use prevention and mental health support
Type of document:
Implementation plan template
Institutional level:
Supervisory Union / School District
Target population:
Students aged 12 and older
Activities included:
Screening and referral, educational support groups, staff training, peer leadership, evidence-based curricula
Evaluation approach:
Quarterly reporting with outcome and process measures
Year:
2024
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Family Self-Sufficiency Program Grant
Document Type:
Grant Agreement
Agency / Institution:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Author:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Target Audience:
Public Housing Agencies (PHAs), owners of HUD-assisted multifamily housing properties
Period of Effectiveness:
01/01/2025 - 12/31/2025
Approval Date:
March 9, 2024
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Georgia
Subject:
Education, Workforce Development
Document Type:
Manual
Organization:
Technical College System of Georgia (TCSG)
Author:
Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE), Charter System Foundation (CSF), Office of College and Career Academies (OCCA)
Target Audience:
Educational professionals, administrators of Georgia College and Career Academies, policymakers
Certification Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
2024
Last Update:
2024
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Housing and social services
Document Type:
Form
Institution / Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Clients/household members exiting project
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Prevention Programs
Document Type:
Template
Organization / Institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Grantees
Validity Period:
August 1, 2023 – July 31, 2024
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Virginia
Subject:
PSAP Grant Program, Staffing Recognition
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organization:
Virginia Department of Emergency Management
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Virginia primary PSAPs, Virginia State Police, local law enforcement dispatch positions
Period of Validity:
FY24 (July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024)
Approval Date:
September 14, 2023
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Date
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Los Angeles, CA
Topic:
Event Planning
Document Type:
Checklist
Organization:
USC FPM (Facilities Planning and Management)
Author:
USC Facilities Planning and Management
Target Audience:
Event organizers, USC departments, and external vendors
Period of Validity:
FY24
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Seattle
Topic:
Service dogs, ableism, disability justice
Document Type:
Research Article
Organization / Institution:
Seattle Pacific University, Department of Physics
Author:
Amy D. Robertson
Target Audience:
Researchers, disability advocates, public policy experts
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Investment Reporting and Project Progress
Document Type:
Report
Organization:
Gates Foundation
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Grantees, Program Officers
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2026
Region / City:
United States
Theme:
Transitional Housing, Domestic Violence Support
Document Type:
Application Guide
Organization:
Office on Violence Against Women (OVW)
Author:
OVW
Target Audience:
Applicants for OVW Transitional Housing Assistance Grant Program
Period of Effect:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified