№ lp_2_3_42074
File format: docx
Character count: 29775
File size: 572 KB
The document is a manual for team managers in the Kamloops Minor Lacrosse Association, detailing their responsibilities and duties for managing a youth lacrosse team during the season.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Kamloops
Topic:
Lacrosse, Youth Sports Management
Document Type:
Manual
Organization:
Kamloops Minor Lacrosse Association (KMLA)
Author:
KMLA Executive
Target Audience:
Team Managers, Coaches, Parents
Effective Period:
2023 Lacrosse Season
Approval Date:
February 2023
Date of Modifications:
February 2023
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Florida, USA
Subject:
Concussion awareness and head injury prevention
Document Type:
Informed consent form
Organization:
Davie Youth Lacrosse Foundation
Target Audience:
Parents/guardians and youth players
Purpose:
Acknowledgement of receipt of concussion information
Legal Requirement:
State of Florida mandatory concussion awareness
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Champlin, Minnesota
Topic:
COVID-19 preparedness
Document type:
Safety plan
Organization / Institution:
Champlin Park Youth Lacrosse Association
Author:
CPYLA Board
Target audience:
Players, coaches, volunteers, families, spectators, and officials
Effective period:
During the 2020 season
Approval date:
N/A
Modification date:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Pelham, NH
Topic:
Lacrosse Skills Clinic
Document Type:
Participant Release Form
Organization:
Pelham Parks and Recreation
Author:
Pelham Parks and Recreation
Target Audience:
Parents and children aged 6 and up
Period of Activity:
January 18 - February 15, 2026
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2025-2026
Region / City:
Friendswood
Topic:
Sponsorship
Document Type:
Sponsorship Commitment Form
Organization:
FMBC Friendswood Mustang Booster Club
Author:
FHS Boys Lacrosse
Target Audience:
Businesses and individuals interested in sponsoring FHS Boys Lacrosse
Effective Period:
2025-2026
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Sports, Lacrosse
Document Type:
Registration Information
Organization / Institution:
Trinity Boys Lacrosse Booster Club
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Players and their families
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Topic:
Sports, Lacrosse, Hall of Fame
Document Type:
Questionnaire
Organization / Institution:
US Lacrosse
Author:
US Lacrosse
Target Audience:
Nominees for the National Lacrosse Hall of Fame
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Aurora, CO
Theme:
Sports, Advertising
Document Type:
Sponsorship Advertisement
Organization / Institution:
Grandview High School Boys Lacrosse
Author:
Sydney Alie
Target Audience:
Local businesses, Parents of players
Action Period:
Spring 2021
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Eastern Pennsylvania
Topic:
Lacrosse Hall of Fame Nomination
Document Type:
Nominee Questionnaire
Organization:
Eastern Pennsylvania Lacrosse Hall of Fame
Author:
Hank Resch, Michele Doyle
Target Audience:
Lacrosse players, coaches, officials, and volunteers in Eastern Pennsylvania
Period of Action:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
4/23/2020
Note:
Date Submitted
Grade:
Kindergarten, 1st & 2nd, 3rd & 4th, 5th & 6th, 7th & 8th
Region / City:
Garnet Valley District
Theme:
Lacrosse Training Program
Document Type:
Program Overview
Organization:
PAGLA
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Parents, Coaches, Players
Period of Activity:
March - June
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Organization:
Women’s Collegiate Lacrosse Organization (WCLO)
Season:
Spring 2026
Document Type:
Student Athlete Eligibility Verification Form
Purpose:
Verification of student-athlete eligibility and academic standing
Submission Deadline:
February 15, 2026 or one week prior to first game (whichever occurs first)
Responsible Parties:
Head Coach or Team President; Office of the Registrar
Applies To:
Official Team Roster
Eligibility Requirements:
Full-time enrollment and good academic standing
Exception Provision:
Graduating Player Exception for final term prior to graduation
Certification Required:
Registrar’s official stamp or seal
Submission Method:
Upload via WCLO website or email to [email protected]
Governing Rules:
WCLO Operating Procedures & Bylaws
Related Process:
Hardship Waiver Request prior to February 15
Geographical Scope:
Member institutions affiliated with WCLO
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Leduc
Theme:
Lacrosse
Document Type:
Manual
Organization / Institution:
Leduc Crush Lacrosse Club
Author:
Leduc Crush Lacrosse Club
Target Audience:
Coaches, Team Managers, Parents, Players
Period of Validity:
2024 Season
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Description:
This document is a guideline for coaches and managers to help create a positive sporting environment for participants in Leduc Crush Lacrosse.
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Woodbury, MN
Theme:
Lacrosse, Banquet
Document Type:
Invitation
Organization:
East Ridge Lacrosse
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Lacrosse players and their families
Event Date:
June 11th, 6:00pm
Payment Deadline:
June 4th
Changes Date:
Not specified
Context:
Invitation to the 8th Annual Raptors Lacrosse Banquet, including RSVP and payment details.
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Houston, TX
Theme:
Sports Equipment
Document Type:
Guide
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Beginners and veterans of lacrosse
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Wilmington, MA
Theme:
Scholarship Application
Document Type:
Application Form
Organization:
Wilmington Youth Lacrosse Association
Author:
Wilmington Youth Lacrosse Association
Target Audience:
High School Seniors planning to continue education
Period of Action:
Fall 2024
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2023
Location:
Ontario, Canada
Event:
Ontario Lacrosse Festival Provincial Championship
Document Type:
Entry Form
Organizing Body:
Ontario Lacrosse Association
Target Audience:
Lacrosse club administrators and coaches
Submission Deadline:
June 15, 2023
Payment Deadline:
June 15, 2023
Fee:
$800 per team
Divisions:
U9, U11, U13, U15, U17, U22, Girls
Withdrawal Policy:
Forfeit bond and $800 fine per team if withdrawn after July 1, 2023
Email for Submission:
[email protected]
Payment Methods:
Cheque, e-transfer, Peloton transfer
Participation Requirement:
Minimum four teams per division for championship eligibility
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Clinical Study Documentation
Document Type:
Instructional Template
Institution / Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Study Teams, Clinical Researchers
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Maine
Topic:
Politics, Healthcare, Social Security, Abortion
Document Type:
Political Ad/Press Release
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Voters, Political Constituents, General Public
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A