№ lp_2_1_32775
File format: docx
Character count: 46188
File size: 281 KB
TPL Dataflow is a new .NET library designed to facilitate concurrent programming through actor/agent-oriented patterns, supporting high-throughput, low-latency systems.
Year:
2011
Note:
Region / City
Topic:
Dataflow programming, concurrent applications
Document Type:
Technical report
Organization / Institution:
Microsoft
Author:
Stephen Toub
Target Audience:
Software developers, technical computing professionals
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2015
Region / City:
New England
Topic:
Stability Studies, Transmission Planning, NERC TPL-001-4
Document Type:
Study Report
Organization / Institution:
ISO New England
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Not specified
Effective Period:
2015
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Field:
Experimental nuclear science
Topic:
Data acquisition and data processing in nuclear physics experiments
Type of document:
Scientific conference paper
Institution:
National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University
Authors:
Ron Fox; Giordano Cerizza; Sean Liddick; Aaron Chester
Country:
United States
Facility:
National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory (NSCL)
Funding organization:
National Science Foundation
Scientific focus:
Rare isotope beam experiments and decay spectroscopy
Technologies discussed:
Digital nuclear electronics, flash ADCs, FPGAs, parallel computing, MPI, Tcl
Software systems:
NSCLSpecTcl and Tcl MPI package
Research infrastructure:
Coupled cyclotrons and A1900 fragment separator
Data scale described:
Continuous acquisition up to 200 MB/sec and datasets exceeding 100 TB
Computing approach:
Massively parallel histogramming and cluster-based data processing
Note:
Year
Subject:
Fire Safety in Construction
Document Type:
Guidance
Organization / Institution:
Home Builders Federation (HBF)
Author:
Home Builders Federation (HBF)
Target Audience:
HBF members
Note:
Year
Contextual description:
A technical document outlining the structure, mapping, and required formats for Service Responses and Device Alerts in the context of GBCS Payload and MMC Output formats.
Year:
2013
Region / City:
North America
Subject:
Commercial printing standards
Document type:
Technical standard
Author:
Ron Ellis, Joe Fazzi, Don Hutcheson
Target audience:
Printers, designers, print buyers
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
2013
Date of changes:
2013
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Papua New Guinea
Topic:
Data Capture, Health Information Systems
Document Type:
Workshop Agenda
Organization:
CHSPNG Health Services & Programs
Author:
Jerry Kaino, Data Processing Officer
Target Audience:
Healthcare workers involved in Health Managers, Health Information Officer, Data Entry Officer, HEO
Duration:
6 hours
Year:
2025
Region / City:
British Columbia
Topic:
Human Rights Tribunal procedures and case management
Document Type:
Checklist
Organ / Institution:
British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Counsel representing complainants or respondents before the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal
Period of Effect:
2025-2026
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
November 15, 2024
Instructor:
Marcus Chatfield, MSc, PhD
Email:
[email protected]
Course Type:
Experiential Learning Course
Credits:
1
Delivery Mode:
Asynchronous Online
Class Numbers:
27008 & 27011, Sections REO2 and RUFON
Institution:
University of Florida
Prerequisites:
Liberal Arts and Sciences student
Required Materials:
Thomas S. Mullaney and Christopher Rea, Where Research Begins: Choosing a Research Project That Matters to You (University of Chicago Press, 2022)
Office Hours:
Tuesdays 12:00 to 1:30, by appointment on Bookings
Office Location:
Turlington 1120-H (Zoom for UF Online students)
Phone:
352-294-2864
Semester:
Spring 2026
Assessment:
Research Resource Report, Annotated Bibliography, Project Description and Research Question, Research Record, Readings and Discussions, Research Proposal
Instructor:
Bob Choquette
E-Mail:
[email protected]
Phone:
541.346.3851
Office Location / Hours:
106 Hendricks: Mondays and Thursdays 10:00 – 11:00 am
Class Days and Time:
Tuesdays and Thursdays: 12 noon – 1:20 pm
Class Location:
302 Gerlinger
GE:
Dani Dolphin
Office Location:
EMU 2nd floor student lounge
Office Hours:
Tuesdays and Thursdays: 1:30 – 2:50 pm
Year:
2025
Region / City:
United States, University of Oregon
Topic:
Nonprofit Sector, Education
Document Type:
Syllabus
Author:
Bob Choquette
Target Audience:
University students
Period of Validity:
Fall 2025
Date of Approval:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Religious studies, Meditation
Document Type:
Study guide
Institution / Organization:
Harvestime International Network
Author:
A.W. Tozer
Target Audience:
Christians seeking to understand Biblical meditation
Period of Validity:
Indefinite
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2025-2026
Region / City:
USA
Subject:
Search Plan for Tenure Track Positions
Document Type:
Template
Institution:
University of Oregon
Author:
Maeve Anderson
Target Audience:
Search Committees, Recruitment Teams
Period of Action:
AY 2025-2026
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
1929
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Securities regulation, stock market behavior, investor protection
Document Type:
Regulatory framework
Organization:
SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Investors, financial analysts, regulators
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Kampar
Subject:
Information & Communication Technology
Document Type:
Guide
Institution:
Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman
Author:
FYP Committee
Target Audience:
UTAR FICT Students
Period:
Academic Year 2019
Approval Date:
May 29, 2019
Date of Last Update:
May 29, 2019
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Michigan
Theme:
Health care services, Medicaid, Behavioral Health
Document Type:
Handbook
Organization / Institution:
Michigan Department of Health & Human Services (MDHHS)
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Medicaid members
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Arizona
Topic:
Legal Procedure
Document Type:
Legal Guidance
Target Audience:
Parties involved in garnishment proceedings
Context:
Legal guidance document explaining the garnishment procedure in Arizona, including the roles of the judgment creditor, debtor, and garnishee.