№ lp_2_3_46807
File format: docx
Character count: 3068
File size: 35 KB
This is a template to assist students in drafting a project outline for research in consultation with advisors, including details on study design, data collection, and roles of participants and advisors.
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
University of Toronto
Topic:
Research Project Planning
Document Type:
Template
Organization / Institution:
University of Toronto
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students, Co-Advisors
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Revision Date:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
[INSERT YEAR]
Region / State:
[STATE]
Event:
National Travel and Tourism Week Commemoration
Document Type:
Congressional Request Letter
Organization:
[INSERT ORGANIZATION]
Recipient:
U.S. Senator or Representative
Date of Event:
[INSERT DATE]
Location:
[INSERT LOCATION]
Purpose:
Highlight impact of travel and tourism on local jobs and economy
Target Audience:
Member of Congress and staff
Economic Data:
Employment and spending figures from travel industry in [STATE]
Follow-up Actions:
Opportunity to meet if unable to attend event
Year:
2023
Region / City:
[Insert name of county]
Theme:
Inspire Kids to Do
Document Type:
Press Release
Organization:
4-H
Author:
[Insert name of local 4-H staff member]
Target Audience:
General Public
Period of Activity:
October 7-13, 2023
Approval Date:
[Insert date]
Date of Changes:
[Insert date of changes]
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Medical Vocabulary, Search Strategy
Document Type:
Guide
Institution:
National Library of Medicine
Author:
National Library of Medicine
Target Audience:
Healthcare Students, Healthcare Providers, Information Professionals, Researchers
Effective Date:
2026
Revision Date:
N/A
Note:
Year
Year:
2010
Region / City:
North Carolina
Topic:
Legal Documents, Notarization, Grantor Execution
Document Type:
Legal Deed
Organization / Institution:
Department of Transportation
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Individuals, Corporations, Legal Professionals
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Topic:
Document Type:
Year:
2022
Type of document:
Academic article template
Intended audience:
Researchers and authors
Font specifications:
Times New Roman 10-point for text, 14-point bold for title, 12-point italic for second-level headings
Line spacing:
1.5
Sections included:
Abstract, Keywords, Headings, Figures, Acknowledgement, References
Contextual description:
Template source detailing the structure, formatting, and typographic standards for preparing an academic article with abstract, keywords, headings, figures, and references.
Year:
1997
Region / City:
San Diego, CA, USA
Topic:
Scientific Research
Document Type:
Journal Article
Organization / Institution:
National Library of Medicine
Author:
Chaen H., McCarter JD, Withers SG, Kumagai A., Tada S., Nozaki K., Mizuno M., Kanda T., Suzuki S., Young AH., Hicks KB., Salton MRJ., Lehle L., Tanner W.
Target Audience:
Researchers, Academics
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Technical specifications
Document type:
Change request
Organization / Institution:
3GPP
Author:
Ericsson
Target audience:
3GPP Working Group
Effective period:
N/A
Approval date:
2021-02-04
Modification date:
N/A
Summary of changes:
Correction of ambiguous and inconsistent OBUE table headings
Impact of non-approval:
OBUE table headings would remain ambiguous, incomplete, or incorrect
Clauses affected:
6.6.5.5.2, 6.6.5.5.3
Other specifications affected:
37.145-2, 37.105
Category:
F (correction)
Release:
Rel-15
Context description:
This document is a change request for technical specifications regarding the clarification and correction of OBUE table headings in the 3GPP standards.
Year:
2021
Date:
2021-02-04
Organization:
3GPP
Technical Body:
TSG-RAN WG4
Meeting:
TSG-RAN WG4 Meeting #98-e
Specification:
3GPP TS 37.105
Current Version:
15.11.0
Release:
Rel-15
Work Item Code:
TEI15
Category:
F (correction)
Source to WG:
Ericsson
Source to TSG:
R4
Affected Clauses:
6.6.5.2.2, 6.6.5.2.3, 9.7.5.2.2, 9.7.5.2.3
Affected Specifications:
37.145-1, 37.145-2
Subject:
OBUE table headings and applicability for Band Categories 1 and 3
Technical Scope:
Operating Band Unwanted Emission (OBUE) requirements for MSR and AAS Base Stations
Reason for Change:
Ambiguity and inconsistency in OBUE applicability table headings
Consequences if Not Approved:
Continued ambiguity and incomplete or incorrect OBUE table headings
Revision History:
Rev1 – correction of BC3 applicability and addition of “or” in penultimate BS type
Organization:
3rd Generation Partnership Project
Working Group:
3GPP TSG-RAN WG4
Meeting:
TSG-RAN WG4 Meeting #98-e
Document Number:
R4-2103883
Specification:
3GPP TS 37.104
Current Version:
15.12.0
Change Request:
CR 0934 Rev.1
Release:
Rel-15
Category:
F (correction)
Work Item Code:
TEI15
Source to WG:
Ericsson
Source to TSG:
R4
Date:
2021-02-04
Affected Clauses:
3.3; 6.6.2.1; 6.6.2.2
Related Specification:
3GPP TS 37.141
Subject:
OBUE table headings and applicability alignment
Technical Domain:
Radio Access Network
Abbreviations Included:
OBUE; UEM; BS; NR; NB-IoT; GSM; EDGE; RAT; BC; RF
Note:
Date
Title:
Class Headings – Goods (Nice Classification)
Language:
English
Subject:
Classification of goods
Type of document:
International classification list
System:
Nice Classification
Scope:
Goods classes 1–31
Purpose:
Categorization of goods for registration and administrative use
Structure:
Numbered classes with descriptive headings
Coverage:
Industrial, commercial and consumer goods
Issuing framework:
International trademark classification system
Legal context:
Trademark registration
Year:
Not specified
Region / Institution:
Generic academic institutions
Topic:
Academic paper preparation and formatting
Document Type:
Guidelines / Instructions
Authors:
Not specified
Intended Audience:
Researchers, Academics, Authors
Paper Size:
A4 (21.0 cm x 29.7 cm)
Font:
Times New Roman
Font Sizes:
Headings 11 pt bold, Subheadings 10 pt regular, Body 10 pt
Spacing:
Single
Sections Included:
Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Headings, Methodology, Figures and Tables, Conclusion, Acknowledgements, References
Citation Style:
Numbered references in order of appearance
Figures and Tables Numbering:
Sequential in text
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Academic Writing / Document Formatting
Document Type:
Template / Guidelines
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students, Researchers, Authors
Sections Included:
Introduction, Chapters, Conclusions, References
Formatting Instructions:
Headings, Styles, Figures, Tables, Cross References, Lists, Code Examples
File Type:
Word Document Guide
Content Structure:
Step-by-step formatting instructions for academic papers
Template Purpose:
Standardize appearance and organization of manuscripts
Language:
English
Document type:
Poster template text with section headings and figure caption
Structure elements:
Section headings, paragraph text, figure caption, mathematical expression
Figure caption:
Figure 1: This is a caption
Mathematical notation:
dydt = sinη + abcosβdx
Text source fragments:
Adapted phrases from the "To be, or not to be" soliloquy
Literary source:
Hamlet
Author of source text:
William Shakespeare
Content type:
Placeholder and demonstration text
Purpose:
Layout and formatting demonstration for poster-style documents
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Australia
Subject:
Joint venture formation
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Solicitors, legal professionals
Year:
2023
Region / city:
California
Topic:
Anti-SLAPP motions
Document type:
Legal guide
Organization / institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target audience:
Legal professionals
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of amendments:
N/A