№ files_lp_3_process_7_096676
File format: docx
Character count: 8221
File size: 24 KB
Analytical contribution discussing the relational understanding of nature among dairy farmers in Northeast Twente and examining how religious traditions, historical narratives, and environmental policies such as Natura 2000 and the Water Framework Directive intersect with debates on farming, stewardship, and cultural rights.
Author:
Tanja van Hummel PhD
Profession:
Independent researcher; philosopher and religious scholar
Research basis:
PhD dissertation
Region:
Northeast Twente, eastern Netherlands
Country:
Netherlands
Geographical context:
Rural border region between Almelo, Hengelo, Enschede, Gronau and Nordhorn
Religious context:
Roman Catholicism mixed with elements of German nature religion
Main actors:
Dairy farmers
Themes:
Human–nature relationship; cultural rights; religious practices; agricultural heritage; environmental policy
Historical references:
Saxon period (first centuries CE); farm foundations dating back to circa 1500; prehistoric habitation
Cultural practices:
Harvest-Thanksgiving Day (Oogstdankvieringen); Our Lady roadside shrines; land crosses; rooftop symbols
Institutional frameworks:
Natura 2000; Water Framework Directive
Policy context:
Nitrogen emission reduction policies; farmers’ protests of 2022
Environmental issues:
Nitrogen deposition; water quality deterioration; buffer zones along ditches
Concepts discussed:
Stewardship; commons (marke); co-production of landscape; industrialised versus nature-inclusive farming
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2018
Region / City:
Northeast United States
Subject:
Integrated Pest Management
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
Northeastern IPM Center
Author:
Donna Ellis, Chair
Target Audience:
IPM Coordinators, Agricultural Stakeholders
Period of Effect:
03/01/2017 to 03/19/2018
Approval Date:
04/04/2018
Date of Modifications:
N/A
Note:
Summary of the document
Year:
2020
Region / city:
Ancient Northeast
Topic:
Ancient Mesopotamian history
Document type:
Historical analysis
Organization / institution:
Festivus
Author:
Jason Hong
Target audience:
Scholars of Ancient Near Eastern history
Period of validity:
2020
Approval date:
N/A
Date of revisions:
N/A
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Northeast Housing Court
Theme:
Homelessness prevention, Disability, Tenancy preservation
Document Type:
Program Description
Organization / Institution:
Northeast Housing Court
Target Audience:
Tenants, landlords, Housing Court staff
Date:
October 1, 2020
Location:
Killington, Vermont
Organization:
Killington World Cup Foundation
Event:
2019 HomeLight Killington Cup
Total Grant Amount:
$228,000
Number of Grants:
21
Grant Range:
$1,000 to $25,000
Funding Start Date:
September 15, 2020
Beneficiary Region:
Northeast United States and SARA region (ME/NH/VT/CT/NY/MA/RI/NJ/PA/NC/VA/WV)
Purpose:
Support for youth winter sports participation and competition and training infrastructure
Type of Document:
Press release
Contact:
Lynn Boynton
Related Organizations:
U.S. Ski & Snowboard; POWDR; Killington Resort
Region:
Northeast Ohio
State:
Ohio
Country:
United States
Subject:
Foster parent training coordination
Document type:
Contact directory
Organization:
Northeast Ohio Regional Training Center
Associated agencies:
County Departments of Job and Family Services (DJFS); County Children Services Boards (CSB)
Counties covered:
Ashland County; Ashtabula County; Columbiana County; Geauga County; Holmes County; Lake County; Lorain County; Mahoning County; Medina County; Portage County; Stark County; Summit County; Trumbull County; Wayne County
Content elements:
County offices; liaisons; RTC contacts; mailing addresses; phone numbers; fax numbers; email addresses; training locations
Intended audience:
Foster parents; prospective foster parents; agency staff
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Northeast Syria
Subject:
Education, Humanitarian Aid
Document Type:
Letter
Organization:
Education International
Author:
[Name of Union/Organisation]
Target Audience:
Foreign Affairs Ministries, Syrian Diplomatic Representation, Humanitarian Actors, National Parliaments, Public Authorities
Period of Action:
Immediate
Date of Approval:
[Date]
Date of Changes:
[Date]
Context:
Letter addressing the protection of educators and students in Northeast Syria amidst ongoing violence and political pressure threatening the region’s inclusive education system.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Northeast India
Theme:
Archaeology, Agriculture
Document Type:
Research Paper
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Rajen Barua
Target Audience:
Scholars and Researchers in the field of Archaeology and Agriculture
Period of Relevance:
Prehistoric Era, around 6000 BCE
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2018
Region / City:
Monroe, LA
Topic:
Governance, Financial Planning, Board Elections
Document Type:
Meeting Minutes
Organization:
NORTHEAST DELTA HUMAN SERVICES AUTHORITY (NEDHSA)
Author:
Board Members
Target Audience:
NEDHSA staff, board members, and local stakeholders
Period of Action:
November 13, 2018
Approval Date:
November 13, 2018
Date of Changes:
None
Description:
Meeting minutes documenting the discussions and decisions made at the NEDHSA Board Meeting on November 13, 2018, including financial reports, policy reviews, and officer elections.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Northeast
Subject:
Football Tournament Registration
Document Type:
Registration Form
Organization / Institution:
Apollo Facility Management Northeast Junior Football League
Author:
Christopher Lowther
Target Audience:
Team managers, coaches, and players
Effective Period:
August 2023
Date of Approval:
August 2023
Payment Information:
£50 per team via BACS payment
Date of Changes:
N/A
Organization:
Northeast District Department of Health
Address:
69 South Main Street, Unit 4, Brooklyn, CT 06234
Phone:
(860) 774-7350
Fax:
(860) 774-1308
Website:
www.nddh.org
Email:
[email protected]
Document Type:
Application Form
Subject:
Campground Operation and Sanitary Facilities
Region:
Brooklyn, Connecticut
State:
Connecticut
Country:
United States
Applicable To:
Campground Owners and Managers
Required Information:
Establishment details, ownership, campground type, utilities, sanitary facilities, seasonal operation dates
Water Supply Options:
Private or Public
Sewage Disposal Options:
Septic System or Public
Includes:
Facility counts, waste management details, food service information, bathing facilities information
Approval Section:
Sanitarian Approved Initial and Date
Administrative Section:
Fee, Payment Method, Receipt Number
Year:
2012
Region / City:
Northeast Nigeria
Topic:
Internally Displaced Persons, Civil Documentation, Humanitarian Rights
Document Type:
Policy Analysis / Report
Institution:
Federal Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs, Disaster Management and Social Development
Author:
Zainab Oluwabukola Atta Esq
Target Audience:
Humanitarian organizations, policymakers, civil society actors
Effective Period:
2012–present
Date of Approval:
September 1, 2021
Legislation Reference:
National Policy on Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) in Nigeria
Key Focus:
Protection of rights, access to civil documents, participation in elections, gender and disability inclusion
Year:
2018–2020
Region / Country:
Nigeria
Sector:
Food Security, Livelihoods, WASH
Document Type:
Terms of Reference / Feasibility Study
Implementing Organization:
Action Against Hunger France
Donor:
Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation
Project Duration:
24 months
Start Date:
1 April 2018
End Date:
1 April 2020
Evaluation Type:
Feasibility study for income-generating activities and cost-benefit analysis
Target Groups:
IDPs, host community members, returnees, women, children, persons with special needs
Project Locations:
Borno State (Gubio and Mobbar LGAs), Yobe State (Yunusai and Geidam LGAs)
Activities:
Agro recovery, vegetable production, compost making, water point saving, cooking training, soap making, latrine and bathroom construction, tree nurseries, energy saving stoves
Objective:
Improve food security, nutrition, resilience, and sustainable livelihoods
Users:
Action Against Hunger field teams, local communities, entrepreneurs, donors, government agencies, NGOs
Language:
English
Year:
2017
Region:
Northeast United States
Type of Document:
Seed Mix Plan
Purpose:
Stabilization of steep eroding slopes
Agency:
BWSR (Board of Water and Soil Resources)
Specialization:
NRCS 342
Planting Area:
Northeast
Plant Categories:
Forb, Graminoid, Legume
Total Seed Rate:
68.74 seeds/sq ft
Date Finalized:
06-Jan-2017
Notes:
Oats used as cover crop except in some wetland mixes; winter wheat may substitute for late fall germination
Note:
Year
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Baytown, Texas
Topic:
Volunteer program, Bird watching
Document type:
Volunteer Handbook
Organization:
Baytown Nature Center
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Volunteers for Bird Buddies program
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Chilika Wildlife Division, Odisha
Subject:
Tender Invitation
Document Type:
Tender Notice
Organ / Institution:
Office of the Divisional Forest Officer, Chilika Wildlife Division
Author:
Divisional Forest Officer
Target Audience:
Contractors, Government Agencies, Suppliers
Validity Period:
2 months
Approval Date:
23rd December 2025
Modification Date:
3rd January 2026
Note:
Study Summary 1.1 Please provide a brief summary of the study in the table below. A complete description of the study with detailed information should be provided in the body of the protocol. For sections not applicable to the study, mark them as N/A. Study Title Study Design Primary Objective/Purpose Secondary Objective(s)/Purposes Research Intervention(s) ClinicalTrials.gov NCT # Study Population Sample Size Study Duration for individual subjects Study Specific Abbreviations/ Definitions
Background 3.1 Provide the scientific or scholarly background for, rationale for, and significance of the research based on the existing literature and how will it add to existing knowledge. :
this section should be limited to only information directly related to the research questions and objectives. Do not include your full dissertation proposal. 3.2 Describe any relevant preliminary data (e.g. pilot data).
Procedures Involved 5.1 Describe and explain the study design. 5.2 Please select the methods that will be employed in this study (select all that apply):
☐ Audio/Video Recording ☐ Psychophysiological Recording ☐ Behavioral Interventions ☐ Record Review - Educational ☐ Behavioral Observations and Experimentations ☐ Record Review - Employee ☐ Deception ☐ Record Review- Medical ☐ Focus Groups ☐ Record Review - Other ☐ Interviews ☐ Specimen Collection or Analysis ☐ Investigational Medical Device – (e.g. Medical Mobile Applications) ☐ Surveys and/or Questionnaires ☐Psychometric Testing ☐ Other Social-Behavioral Procedures Provide a description of all research procedures being performed and when they are performed. (Upload any surveys, questionnaires, interview scripts, focus group scripts, debriefing scripts, psychometric tests, stimulus materials, intervention manuals, and data collection forms on the Local Site Documents page in the IRB application.) 5.3 Describe the procedures or interventions that are going to be conducted as part of the research project, but that would have been conducted anyway, even if the research was not occurring (i.e. standard of care procedures, activities that would occur in a classroom). 5.4 Describe the procedures performed to lessen the probability or magnitude of risks of items selected in 5.2.5. 5 If accessing or collecting existing data, describe: The data that will be collected during the study (e.g. demographics, medical history, etc.). Attach the data capture sheet(s) on the Local Site Documents page in the IRB application. How the data will be obtained, including how you have the authority to access the data. The source or location of the data (e.g. USF Epic, TGH Epic, Hillsborough County School records, CANVAS records, publicly available databases, etc.). 5.6 If collecting and/or analyzing biological specimens, describe: How the biological specimens will be or have been collected. How the biological specimens will be stored. How long the biological specimens will be stored. How the biological specimens will be used. The laboratories that will be used. Whether the collected biological specimens will undergo genetic testing. If so, indicate if this study is part of a Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) and whether the data will be forwarded to the NIH dbGaP. 5.7 If there are plans for long-term follow-up (once all research related procedures are complete), what data will be collected during this period.
Data and Specimen Storage for Future Research 6.1 If data or specimens will be banked for future research studies, describe where the data or specimens will be stored, how long it/they will b:
the process to request a release, approvals required for release, who can obtain data or specimens, and the data to be provided with specimens.
Year:
2023
Region:
Chilterns, England, United Kingdom
Subject:
Nature conservation and habitat restoration
Document type:
Strategic plan / guidance
Organization:
Natural England
Target audience:
Land managers, conservation organizations, local authorities, local communities
Key habitats:
Woodlands, chalk streams, wetlands, ponds, farmland
Geographical significance:
National Landscape designation
Objectives:
Nature recovery, species protection, habitat connectivity, monitoring and evaluation
Legislation framework:
Protected Landscape Targets and Outcomes Framework (PLTOF)
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters