№ files_lp_4_process_3_086578
File format: docx
Character count: 4530
File size: 50 KB
Application for new members to Break the Silence Peer Educators program, outlining required training, selection process, and interview schedule.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Lehigh University
Topic:
Gender Violence Prevention, Sexuality Education
Document Type:
Application Form
Organization / Institution:
Break the Silence
Author:
Brooke E. DeSipio, PhD
Target Audience:
Students interested in joining Break the Silence
Duration:
Fall 2023
Approval Date:
September 30, 2023
Modification Date:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2018
Region / City:
Salem
Theme:
Fiction, Personal Development
Document Type:
Honors Thesis
Institution:
Salem State University
Author:
Colleen West
Advisor:
Kevin Carey
Target Audience:
Students, Academics
Period of Activity:
2018
Approval Date:
2018
Date of Changes:
None
Year:
2025
Region:
United States
Topic:
Education / School Policy
Document Type:
Policy Notice
Organization:
School District
Audience:
Parents/Guardians and Students
Policy Number:
08.1351 AP.1
Duration of Moment:
1–2 minutes
Date of Review:
6/9/2025
Legal Reference:
KRS 158.175
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Moment of silence or reflection in schools
Document type:
Policy/Notice
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Parents/Guardians, Students
Effective period:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
7/22/2025
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Education
Document Type:
Policy
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Parents/Guardians
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
8/26/2025
Revision Date:
8/26/2025
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Roanoke
Theme:
Local Government, Village Meeting
Document Type:
Meeting Minutes
Institution:
Roanoke Village Board
Author:
Village Board Members
Target Audience:
Local Community Members, Government Officials
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Education
Document Type:
Policy
Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Parents/Guardians
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
7/14/2025
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Organization:
Department of Science, Technology and Innovation (DSTI)
Document Type:
Terms of Reference / Event Brief
Theme:
Men’s Mental Health Awareness
Target Audience:
Male employees of DSTI
Event Type:
In-person interactive session
Duration:
2 hours
Service Provider Required:
Life coach, psychologist, medical professional, or social worker
Evaluation Criteria:
Price (80 points), Specific Goals (20 points)
Compliance Requirements:
Central Supplier Database registration, Tax compliance, SBD forms, B-BBEE certificate or Sworn Affidavit
Purpose:
Raise awareness of men’s mental health issues and provide practical coping strategies
Methodology:
Interactive presentation with practical examples and discussion
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
North Karanpura
Theme:
Price breakdown for construction and engineering services
Document Type:
Contract / Tender
Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Contractors and service providers in the construction and engineering field
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2007
Region / city:
England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales
Subject:
Adoption, Fostering, Health Assessment
Document type:
Health Report
Organization:
Agency responsible for adoption and fostering
Author:
Unknown
Target audience:
Prospective adoptive parents, foster carers, GP
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / city:
Manchester
Topic:
Property law, Lease disputes
Document type:
Judgment
Court / institution:
High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts in Manchester
Author:
Judge Hodge QC
Target audience:
Legal professionals, Property lawyers, Academics
Period of validity:
2021
Approval date:
1 April 2021
Date of changes:
None
Year:
2007
Region / city:
British Columbia
Topic:
Dam Safety, Flood Inundation, Consequence Classification
Document Type:
Guideline
Institution:
Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Dam safety officers, engineers, dam owners
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Year:
20XX
Keywords:
A; B; C; D; F
Type:
Review/Research Article
Corresponding Author:
[email protected]
Date Received:
XX Month 20XX
Date Accepted:
XX Month 20XX
Date Published:
XX Month 20XX
Institution:
Name of Institution, Country
Author 1:
Firstnames Lastname
Author 2:
Abcd E. Ghij
Author 3:
Klmn Opqr
Author 4:
Stuv Wx Yz4
References:
[1] Ogheneochuko Ubrurhe et al., "A Review of Energy Efficiency in Wireless Body Area/Sensor Networks", Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1 Jan 2020, DOI: 10.33166/AETiC.2020.01.001
Form number:
RHW25
Jurisdiction:
Wales
Country:
United Kingdom
Legislation:
Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016
Related legislation:
Housing (Wales) Act 2014; Housing Act 2004; Renting Homes (Fees etc.) (Wales) Act 2019
Document type:
Statutory notice form
Subject:
Termination of fixed term standard occupation contract under landlord’s break clause
Notice period:
Minimum two months
Parties:
Landlord; Contract-holder(s)
Property:
Dwelling subject to occupation contract
Grounds:
Exercise of landlord’s break clause under section 194(1)
Restrictions:
Sections 194, 196, 197, 198, 200 and 217 of the Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016
Court involvement:
Possession claim required if dwelling not vacated
Intended recipients:
Contract-holders of fixed term standard contracts with two-month minimum notice period
Note:
Year
Year:
2024-2025
Region / City:
Australia, New Zealand
Topic:
Promotion Terms and Conditions
Document Type:
Terms and Conditions
Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Australian and New Zealand residents aged 18+
Validity Period:
November 14, 2024 - March 28, 2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Program Name:
Gary E. Everhardt Park Break Program
Project Title:
Physical and Programmatic Accessibility Assessment
Location:
Reconstruction Era National Historical Park, Beaufort, South Carolina
Dates:
May 14–21, 2023
Application Deadline:
March 10, 2023
Organizing Institutions:
The Institute for Parks at Clemson University; George Wright Society; U.S. National Park Service (NPS)
Host Site:
Reconstruction Era National Historical Park (REER)
Eligibility:
Currently enrolled MA/MS and PhD candidates
Academic Requirement:
Graduate students only
Objective:
Assessment of facility improvements required under the Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) and review of park programs and interpretive media for accessibility
Submission Contact:
Bob Powell ([email protected]
Note:
)
Required Applicant Information:
Personal details; educational background; advisor information; thesis/dissertation topic; gender identity; racial identity; applicant statement (300 words or less); referral source
Relevant Legislation:
Architectural Barriers Act (ABA)
Document Type:
Program application form
Year:
2020
Organization:
NASA Marshall Space Flight Center
Authors:
Monsi Roman, Naveen Vetcha, Michael R. Fiske
Type of document:
Research Paper / Technical Overview
Region:
United States, Huntsville, AL
Program:
Centennial Challenges Program
Target Audience:
Aerospace researchers, industry experts, academic community
Related Initiative:
Lunar Surface Innovation Initiative (LSII)
Focus Areas:
Lunar excavation, in situ resource utilization, sustainable power, extreme environment functionality, dust mitigation, autonomous construction
Period of Activities:
October 2019 – November 2020
Challenge Launch:
Planned November 2020
Collaborators:
NASA centers, academia, industry, other government agencies
Summary:
Technical overview detailing NASA’s Break the Ice Lunar Challenge as part of the Centennial Challenges Program, describing the identification of lunar excavation technology gaps, stakeholder workshops, and the development of autonomous systems for sustainable operations on the Moon.