№ files_lp_3_process_7_015546
File format: docx Character count: 18468 File size: 54 KB
Judicial reasons and interlocutory orders of the Federal Court of Australia addressing liability for costs in dismissed electoral petitions and the possible application of s 360(4) of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth).
Year: 2020
Court: Federal Court of Australia sitting as the Court of Disputed Returns
Jurisdiction: Australia
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Case Name: Garbett v Liu (No 2)
Neutral Citation: [2020] FCAFC 14
File Numbers: VID 1018 of 2019; VID 1019 of 2019
Judges: Allsop CJ; Greenwood J; Besanko J
Date of Judgment: 20 February 2020
Date of Orders: 20 February 2020
Date of Hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of Last Submissions: 7 February 2020
Legislation Considered: Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth), ss 6, 329, 360, 362, 363
Cases Cited: Evans v Crichton-Browne [1981] HCA 14; 147 CLR 169; Green v Bradbury (No 2) [2011] FCA 469; Hudson v Lee (No 2) [1993] HCA 58; 177 CLR 627; Nile v Wood (No 2) [1988] HCA 30; 167 CLR 133
Parties: Vanessa Claire Garbett v Gladys Liu and Australian Electoral Commission; Oliver Tennant Yates v Joshua Anthony Frydenberg and Australian Electoral Commission
Subject Matter: Costs in electoral petitions and application of s 360(4) of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth)
Outcome: Directions for submissions regarding potential costs orders against the Commonwealth; second respondent to bear its own costs; remaining questions of costs reserved
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.

Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?

You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:
  1. Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
  2. In the app, tap Send.
  3. Select network, paste our wallet address.
  4. Send the exact amount shown above.
After sending, paste your TXID (transaction ID) and your email to receive the download link. Need help? Contact support and we’ll guide you step by step.

The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Mackay Sugar Limited v Wilmar Sugar Australia Limited [2016] FCAFC 133
Year: 2016
Region / City: Australia
Theme: Corporations Law, Commercial Disputes
Document Type: Court Judgment
Court / Institution: Federal Court of Australia
Author: Judges Gilmour, Jagot, and White
Target Audience: Legal professionals, corporate entities, academics
Period of Validity: N/A
Approval Date: 6 October 2016
Modification Date: N/A
Purchasing Card Claims Statement of Disputed Item
Year: Not specified
Region / City: Not specified
Document Type: Form
Institution: Bank of America – Business Card Services Operations
Intended Audience: Commercial cardholders
Submission Deadline: Within 60 days from billing close date
Purpose: Dispute of unauthorized or incorrect charges on a commercial card
EXISTENCE OF FIDUCIARY DUTY DISPUTED
Year: 2002
Region / City: Florida
Subject: Fiduciary duty, legal relationships
Document type: Legal instruction
Institution: Florida Supreme Court
Author: Florida Supreme Court
Target audience: Legal professionals, lawyers, judges
Effective period: Not specified
Approval date: Not specified
Amendment date: Not specified
Attachment Pages for Form 8190: Inventory List of Attachments, Undisputed Facts, and Disputed Facts (USPS and NALC)
Organization: United States Postal Service (USPS); National Association of Letter Carriers (NALC)
Document Type: Grievance procedure form attachment
Related Form: Form 8190
Sections Included: Inventory List of Attachments; Undisputed Facts; Union Disputed Facts & Contentions; Management’s Disputed Facts & Contentions
Participants: Carrier Supervisor; NALC Steward
Purpose: Recording reviewed attachments, agreed facts, disputed facts, and positions of union and management
Signature Requirement: Carrier Supervisor signature; NALC Steward signature
Process Context: Labor grievance documentation between USPS management and NALC union representatives
Page References: Page 2–Page 5 attachments to Form 8190
Topics: Garbett FCAFC Disputed