№ files_lp_3_process_9_62783
File format: docx
Character count: 1225
File size: 29 KB
This document outlines how training programs can specify and assess program-specific competencies and their associated elements.
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Education / Training
Document Type:
Instructional Guide
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students, Educators
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
202X
Region / City:
Rockville, Maryland
Topic:
Advanced Nursing Education Programs
Document Type:
Statement
Organization / Institution:
HRSA (Health Resources and Services Administration)
Author:
HRSA
Target Audience:
Applicants to ANE Programs
Period of Action:
07/01/202X - 06/30/202X
Approval Date:
XX/XX/202X
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Institution:
Queen’s University, [Department/Division of X]
Document Type:
Policy Addendum
Scope:
[X] Residency Training Program
Target Audience:
Residents, Program Directors, Preceptors, Program Administrators
Purpose:
Mitigate and manage fatigue risk during clinical training
Key Topics:
Fatigue definition, fatigue risk management, resident responsibilities, supervisory responsibilities, clinical and psychological fatigue, scheduling guidelines
Reference Documents:
PGME Policy on Fatigue Risk Management, Resident Doctors of Canada Fatigue Risk Management Toolkit, PARO-OTH Collective Agreement
Procedures:
Call scheduling, vacation utilization, supervision, incident reporting, physical and psychological wellbeing monitoring
Review:
RPC
Note:
Year
Year:
2025
Region / City:
California
Topic:
Conservation and Mitigation Banks
Document Type:
Checklist
Author:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Target Audience:
Bank Sponsors, Environmental Agencies, Consultants
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Last Revision:
August 2025
Context:
This document is a checklist for the preparation of draft prospectuses related to the establishment of conservation and mitigation banks in California, aimed at providing regulatory guidance for proposed bank projects.
Year:
2025
Jurisdiction:
Washington State
Topic:
Drug supply chain security and pharmacy regulatory compliance
Document type:
Self-inspection worksheet
Issuing body:
Washington State Pharmacy Quality Assurance Commission
Governing law:
Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA); RCW 18.64.026; WAC 246-945
Applicable entities:
Drug manufacturers; wholesale distributors; dispensers
Regulatory scope:
State and federal pharmacy law
Compliance status:
Optional addendum with mandatory DSCSA compliance
Intended role:
Responsible pharmacy manager or equivalent manager
Retention requirement:
Kept on file; not submitted to the commission
Source type:
Government regulatory document
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Tribal
Topic:
Child and Family Services
Document Type:
Template
Agency/Institution:
Tribal Agency
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Tribal child and family service administrators
Period of Validity:
2025–2029
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
Education
Document Type:
Checklist
Agency / Institution:
U.S. Department of Education
Author:
U.S. Department of Education
Target Audience:
Applicants for AHC-A program
Period of Validity:
FY 2023
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Oklahoma
Topic:
Assisted living center compliance, corrective action plans
Document Type:
Instruction sheet
Organization / Institution:
Oklahoma State Department of Health
Author:
Oklahoma State Department of Health
Target Audience:
Assisted living center operators
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Humboldt County, California
Subject:
Jail Management System, Inmate Telephone System, and Associated Services
Document Type:
Request for Proposal
Target Audience:
Bidders, Vendors, Service Providers
Effective Period:
July 22, 2019
Approval Date:
May 20, 2019
Date of Modifications:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Pilbara, Australia
Document Type:
Committee decision
Institution:
United Nations Human Rights Committee
Author:
Ailsa Roy, on behalf of the Wunna Nyiyaparli indigenous people
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, human rights experts, indigenous rights advocates
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
15 March 2023
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Organization:
NAIC Innovation, Cybersecurity and Technology (H) Committee
Type of document:
Regulatory guidance / Supplementary tool
Audience:
State insurance regulators
Topics:
Artificial intelligence, machine learning, insurance risk assessment, consumer protection
Sections:
Exhibit A – Quantify Regulated Entity’s Use of AI Systems; Exhibit B – AI Systems Governance Risk Assessment Framework; Exhibit C – AI Systems High-Risk Model Details; Exhibit D – AI Systems Model Data Details
Scope:
Financial and consumer risk evaluation of AI systems usage in insurance companies
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Topic:
F-1 OPT reporting requirements
Document Type:
Form
Organization / Institution:
Office of International Affairs
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
F-1 status students participating in OPT
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Environmental Protection, Solid Waste Management, Tribal Communities
Document Type:
Instructional Guide
Organization:
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Author:
Environmental Protection Agency
Target Audience:
Tribal governments, Intertribal Consortia
Effective Period:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / city:
EU
Subject:
Product Data Access
Document Type:
Information Notice
Organization:
ABB
Author:
ABB
Target Audience:
Customers interested in ABB Connected Products
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Issuing organization:
National Institutes of Health
Program:
Maximizing Investigators’ Research Award for Early Stage Investigators
Funding mechanism:
R35
Clinical trial policy:
Clinical Trial Optional
Document type:
Application guidance and checklist
Subject area:
Biomedical and behavioral research funding
Target applicants:
Early Stage Investigators
Related documents:
Funding Opportunity Announcement; SF424 (R&R) Research Instructions
Application components:
Forms, narrative attachments, budgets, human subjects and clinical trials information
Formatting requirements:
Font, margins, layout, and hyperlink rules specified
Jurisdiction:
United States
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
Artificial Intelligence, Insurance, Risk Management
Document Type:
Regulatory Tool
Institution:
National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC)
Author:
Big Data and AI Working Group (BDAIWG)
Target Audience:
State Regulators, Insurance Companies
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Note:
Year
Manufacturer:
LTG Aktiengesellschaft
Series:
Linear diffusers
Model:
LDB 20/8
Unit price currency:
€
Total price currency:
€
Materials:
Extruded aluminum, plastic, galvanized sheet steel
Adjustable airflow range:
20 … 100 % of nominal volume flow rate
Diffuser versions:
1-slot, 2-slot, 3-slot, 4-slot
Profile options:
Border profiles 00, 11, 22, 44, 55, 88
Rail finishes:
Painted RAL, natural anodized
Cylinder colors:
Black, white, aluminum grey (RAL 9007)
Special features:
Integrated throttling damper DLU, optional sound trap, additional profiles, lamp installation, special air distribution box dimensions, adjustable throttling devices
Unit dimensions:
Maximum length 2000 mm, variable neck height 40–170 mm
Year:
2025
Region/City:
N/A
Topic:
Budgeting
Document Type:
Template
Organization:
EPA Grants Office
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
FY25 applicants
Period of Validity:
FY25
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Switzerland
Topic:
Clinical research, human research projects
Document Type:
Report
Organization:
Swiss Clinical Trial Organisation (SCTO)
Author:
Education Platform of the Swiss Clinical Trial Organisation (SCTO)
Target Audience:
Clinical research professionals, project leaders, and researchers
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Last Update:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters