№ files_lp_3_process_7_088825
File format: docx
Character count: 3134
File size: 18 KB
Year:
2021
Region / city:
Bahrain
Subject:
Amendment to Civil Service Law Implementing Regulation
Document Type:
Legislative Decision
Organization:
Legislation & Legal Opinion Commission
Author:
Prime Minister Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa
Target Audience:
Government employees and civil service authorities
Period of validity:
Indefinite
Approval Date:
12 October 2021
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Philippines
Topic:
Assets and Liabilities Declaration
Document Type:
Government Form
Institution:
Civil Service Commission (CSC)
Author:
Civil Service Commission
Target Audience:
Public officials and employees required to file a SALN
Period of Effect:
As of December 31, [Year]
Date of Approval:
25 June 2025
Date of Amendments:
None
Jurisdiction:
State of Louisiana
Region:
Louisiana, United States
Year:
2025
Month of Promulgation:
February 2025
Title:
Title 28 Education
Part:
Part CXLVI
Bulletin Number:
Bulletin 146
Subject:
Teacher Competencies and Educational Leader Professional Standards
Document Type:
Administrative Regulation
Issuing Authority:
Louisiana Board of Elementary and Secondary Education
Promulgated By:
Board of Elementary and Secondary Education
Legal Authority:
R.S. 17:6; R.S. 17:7(6); R.S. 17:3902; R.S. 17:8.1–8.5
Applicable Levels:
K-12 Education
Applies To:
Teacher Candidates, Certified Teachers, Educational Leaders, Preparation Providers
Related Regulation:
LAC 28:XLV (Bulletin 996)
Scope:
Initial Teacher Certification and Educational Leadership Standards
Effective Framework:
State-Approved Teacher Preparation Programs and Certification Processes
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Nakuru
Topic:
Insolvency, Legal Disputes
Document Type:
Court Ruling
Organ / Institution:
High Court of Kenya
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, parties involved in the case
Period of Validity:
Not applicable
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / city:
Ohio, United States
Subject:
Family Law, Divorce
Document Type:
Court Judgment
Authority / Organization:
Court of Common Pleas
Author:
Judge, Magistrate
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, parties involved in divorce proceedings
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
1957
Country:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Document type:
Charter
Issuing authority:
Royal Decree
Institution:
Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency
Legal basis:
Royal Decree No. 23
Date of issuance:
23 May 1957
Hijri date:
23-5-1377
Subject:
Monetary policy and banking regulation
Scope:
National
Amendments referenced:
Royal Decree No. 10 of 1 July
Governing body:
Board of Directors
Official signatory:
King Saud Ibn Abdul Aziz Al Saud
Note:
Year
Subject:
Legal Documents
Document Type:
Court Decree
Agency / Institution:
Colorado District Court
Author:
Judge
Target Audience:
Parties involved in divorce or legal separation cases
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Moscow
Theme:
International air traffic resumption
Document Type:
Decree
Organ / Institution:
Government of Russian Federation
Author:
Government of Russian Federation
Target Audience:
Airline operators, travelers, air transport agencies
Period of Action:
15.08.2020 - indefinite
Approval Date:
15.08.2020
Amendment Date:
18.03.2020
Context:
The document outlines the resumption of international scheduled air traffic to and from Russia in response to COVID-19 regulations, with specific routes, frequencies, and health measures detailed.
Year:
1979
Country:
State of Bahrain
Place of issuance:
Riffa Palace
Type of document:
Legislative Decree
Subject:
Income Tax on Exploration, Production and Refining of Crude Oil and Natural Hydrocarbons
Issuing authority:
Emir of the State of Bahrain
Issuer:
Isa bin Salman Al Khalifa
Approving body:
Council of Ministers
Implementing authority:
Minister of Development and Industry
Date of issuance:
28 November 1979
Hijri date:
8 Muharram 1400 A.H.
Effective date:
From the date of publication in the Official Gazette; certain provisions effective from 1 January 1979
Related legislation:
Decree No. (80) of 1955; Decree No. (1) of 1966; Law No. (1) of 1977; Emiri Decree No. (4) of 1975
Country:
Kingdom of Bahrain
Issuing Authority:
Minister of Works
Minister:
Eng. Ebrahim bin Hassan Al Hawaj
Date of Issue:
29 August 2023
Hijri Date:
13 Safar 1445 AH
Publication:
Official Gazette
Website Publication Date:
April 2025
Type of Document:
Ministerial Decree and Implementing Regulation
Subject:
Regulation of engineering professions and licensing
Related Legislation:
Law No. (51) of 2014
Amending Legislation:
Legislative Decree No. (18) of 2021
Repealed Legislation:
Decision No. (27) of 2016
Competent Body:
Council for Regulating the Practice of engineering professions
Entry into Force:
Day following publication in the Official Gazette
Structure:
Chapters and Articles
Year:
20__
Region / city:
Montana
Theme:
Family law
Document type:
Legal affidavit
Authority / institution:
State of Montana
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Individuals seeking dissolution of marriage
Period of validity:
Not applicable
Date of approval:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Subject:
Marriage dissolution / Legal separation
Document type:
Legal affidavit
Organ / Institution:
District Court, Colorado
Target audience:
Parties involved in marriage dissolution or legal separation
Year:
1998
Region / City:
Bahrain
Type of Document:
Legislative Decree
Authority / Institution:
Emir of the State of Bahrain
Author:
Isa bin Salman Al Khalifa
Publication Date:
13 June 1998
Period of Application:
From publication in the Official Gazette
Subject Matter:
Human organ transfer and transplantation
Relevant Laws Referenced:
Constitution; Emiri Order No. (4) of 1975; Legislative Decree No. (7) of 1989 regarding the Practice of Human Medicine and Dentistry
Minister Responsible:
Minister of Health
Medical Oversight:
Specialised medical committees for organ removal and transplantation
Year:
2001
Region / City:
Bahrain
Type of Document:
Legislative Decree
Subject:
Commercial Companies Law
Issued by:
Amir of the State of Bahrain
Authority:
Council of Ministers
Amendments:
Law No. (50) of 2014, Legislative Decree No. (28) of 2015, Law No. (1) of 2018, Legislative Decree No. (53) of 2018
Publication Date:
20 June 2001
Implementing Authority:
Minister of Commerce and Industry
Scope:
Commercial companies in Bahrain
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Arizona
Topic:
Family Law
Document Type:
Legal Statute
Organization / Institution:
Arizona State Court
Author:
Arizona Legislature
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, parties involved in marriage dissolution or legal separation
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2015
Region / City:
China
Theme:
Administrative reform, quarantine regulations
Document Type:
Legal decree
Issuing Body:
AQSIQ (General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine)
Author:
AQSIQ
Target Audience:
Relevant government authorities, businesses involved in animal and plant importation
Period of Validity:
From November 25, 2015, onwards
Approval Date:
November 25, 2015
Amendment Date:
November 6, 2015
Year:
2014
Region / City:
Washington, D.C.
Subject:
Compliance with Designated Entity bidding credit and alien ownership requirements
Document Type:
Federal Communications Commission Order
Author:
Federal Communications Commission
Target Audience:
Legal and regulatory professionals, telecommunications industry
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
November 21, 2014
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Jurisdiction:
Superior Court
Subject:
Withdrawal, amendment, or dismissal of settlement agreements in family law matters
Document Type:
Court procedural instructions
Related Documents:
Consent Decree; Parenting Plan; Child Support Order; Stipulation to Dismiss; Joint Motion to Withdraw and Amend Consent Decree; Motion to Withdraw from Summary Consent Decree Process
Applicable Waiting Period:
Sixty (60) days from filing of initial papers
Response Deadline:
Ten (10) days from service of Motion to Withdraw
Issuing Authority:
Court
Intended Audience:
Parties to a divorce or family law case
Procedural Stage:
Before entry of final orders
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Malawi
Subject:
Education, Infrastructure Development, Environmental and Social Management
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
Government of the Republic of Malawi, Ministry of Education
Author:
Government of Malawi
Target Audience:
Government officials, education sector stakeholders, contractors
Implementation Period:
December 2021 – December 2025
Approval Date:
February 2024
Revision Date:
February 2024
Note:
Study Summary 1.1 Please provide a brief summary of the study in the table below. A complete description of the study with detailed information should be provided in the body of the protocol. For sections not applicable to the study, mark them as N/A. Study Title Study Design Primary Objective/Purpose Secondary Objective(s)/Purposes Research Intervention(s) ClinicalTrials.gov NCT # Study Population Sample Size Study Duration for individual subjects Study Specific Abbreviations/ Definitions
Background 3.1 Provide the scientific or scholarly background for, rationale for, and significance of the research based on the existing literature and how will it add to existing knowledge. :
this section should be limited to only information directly related to the research questions and objectives. Do not include your full dissertation proposal. 3.2 Describe any relevant preliminary data (e.g. pilot data).
Procedures Involved 5.1 Describe and explain the study design. 5.2 Please select the methods that will be employed in this study (select all that apply):
☐ Audio/Video Recording ☐ Psychophysiological Recording ☐ Behavioral Interventions ☐ Record Review - Educational ☐ Behavioral Observations and Experimentations ☐ Record Review - Employee ☐ Deception ☐ Record Review- Medical ☐ Focus Groups ☐ Record Review - Other ☐ Interviews ☐ Specimen Collection or Analysis ☐ Investigational Medical Device – (e.g. Medical Mobile Applications) ☐ Surveys and/or Questionnaires ☐Psychometric Testing ☐ Other Social-Behavioral Procedures Provide a description of all research procedures being performed and when they are performed. (Upload any surveys, questionnaires, interview scripts, focus group scripts, debriefing scripts, psychometric tests, stimulus materials, intervention manuals, and data collection forms on the Local Site Documents page in the IRB application.) 5.3 Describe the procedures or interventions that are going to be conducted as part of the research project, but that would have been conducted anyway, even if the research was not occurring (i.e. standard of care procedures, activities that would occur in a classroom). 5.4 Describe the procedures performed to lessen the probability or magnitude of risks of items selected in 5.2.5. 5 If accessing or collecting existing data, describe: The data that will be collected during the study (e.g. demographics, medical history, etc.). Attach the data capture sheet(s) on the Local Site Documents page in the IRB application. How the data will be obtained, including how you have the authority to access the data. The source or location of the data (e.g. USF Epic, TGH Epic, Hillsborough County School records, CANVAS records, publicly available databases, etc.). 5.6 If collecting and/or analyzing biological specimens, describe: How the biological specimens will be or have been collected. How the biological specimens will be stored. How long the biological specimens will be stored. How the biological specimens will be used. The laboratories that will be used. Whether the collected biological specimens will undergo genetic testing. If so, indicate if this study is part of a Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) and whether the data will be forwarded to the NIH dbGaP. 5.7 If there are plans for long-term follow-up (once all research related procedures are complete), what data will be collected during this period.
Data and Specimen Storage for Future Research 6.1 If data or specimens will be banked for future research studies, describe where the data or specimens will be stored, how long it/they will b:
the process to request a release, approvals required for release, who can obtain data or specimens, and the data to be provided with specimens.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters