№ lp_2_3_08510
File format: docx
Character count: 157613
File size: 1659 KB
This document contains a syllabus and handouts focusing on parenting principles and Catholic teachings, providing guidance on child discipline and spiritual education.
Year:
2017-2018
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Parenting, Catholic faith, discipline
Document Type:
Syllabus, Handout
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Kurt Buckman
Target Audience:
Parents, Catholic community
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Central and Northern New Mexico
Theme:
Grants, Children and Youth Support
Document Type:
Grant Application
Organization:
Clothes Helping Kids, Inc.
Author:
Clothes Helping Kids, Inc.
Target Audience:
Non-profit organizations
Period of Action:
2026
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Grade:
Elementary (K-3)
Subject:
Mental/Behavioral Health
Target Audience:
Elementary School Students
Duration:
40 Minutes
Materials:
Hands Are Not for Hitting by Martine Agassi, illustrated by Marieka Heinlen, large poster paper, markers
Pledge handout:
one per student
Suggested Expert:
Mental/Behavioral Health Expert
Note:
Context
Year:
2026
Location:
Downs, Annapolis
Event Type:
Fundraising
Organizer:
Downs Devilrays Swim Team
Charities Supported:
Boys and Girls Club of Annapolis, Food Link, Annapolis Wellness House
Event Dates:
July 7, 2026, July 13, 2026
Event Times:
2:00-4:00 pm, 4:00-6:00 pm, 6:00-8:00 pm
Contact Person:
Dan Mulhern
RSVP Email:
[email protected]
Donation Method:
Cash, Checks
Deadline for Donations:
August 15, 2026
Year:
2021
Region / city:
Wisconsin
Topic:
Shared Revenue, Municipalities
Document Type:
Resolution
Organization / Institution:
League of Wisconsin Municipalities
Author:
Curt Witynski
Target Audience:
Municipalities, Local Governments, Citizens
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
March 2021
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Context:
A resolution document outlining the challenges facing municipalities in Wisconsin due to declining shared revenue and offering a strategy for local governments to advocate for more funding.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Central and Northern New Mexico
Topic:
Grant Application
Document Type:
Application
Organization:
Clothes Helping Kids, Inc.
Author:
Clothes Helping Kids, Inc.
Target Audience:
Nonprofit organizations, grant funders
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Cambridge
Topic:
Law admissions, university applications
Document Type:
Webinar
Institution:
University of Cambridge
Author:
Maria Kazani (Outreach, Widening Participation and Communications Coordinator, Faculty of Law)
Target Audience:
Prospective law students
Period of Validity:
2025
Approval Date:
9th April 2025
Date of Changes:
May 2025
Note:
Context
Year:
2024
Region / City:
UK
Topic:
Education
Document Type:
Guide
Organization / Institution:
Department for Education
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Early Years Educators, Practitioners
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Tri-Cities
Topic:
Grant application instructions
Document type:
Instructions
Organization:
Women Helping Women Fund Tri-Cities (WHWF-TC)
Author:
Women Helping Women Fund Tri-Cities
Target Audience:
Nonprofit organizations, grant applicants
Period of validity:
January 1, 2026 – December 31, 2026
Approval date:
N/A
Amendment date:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Greater Golden Mile, Scarborough, Ontario
Theme:
Economic development, construction, community outreach
Document type:
Press release
Organization / Institution:
Aecon, United Way Greater Toronto
Author:
Adrienne Clarke, Daniele Zanotti
Target audience:
Local residents, job seekers, community organizations
Period of validity:
Ongoing recruitment
Approval date:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
1869
Region / City:
Mount Pleasant, Iowa, U.S.
Document Type:
Article
Organization:
P.E.O.
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Women seeking educational opportunities
Period of Action:
Not specified
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2018
Note:
Region / City
Subject:
Volunteering
Document Type:
Policy
Organization / Institution:
Mearns Kirk Helping Hands
Author:
Vicky Attwood
Target Audience:
Volunteers
Approval Date:
January 2018
Date of Changes:
March 2024
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Dutchess County, NY
Theme:
COVID-19 Crisis Counseling and Support Services
Document Type:
Resource Guide
Organization / Institution:
Astor Services for Children & Families
Author:
Enhanced Coordinated Children’s Services Initiative
Target Audience:
Residents of Dutchess and Rockland Counties
Effective Period:
Ongoing (as of 2021)
Revision Date:
10/19/2021
Date Approved:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
10/19/2021
Year:
2021
Region / City:
New Jersey
Subject:
Substance Use Disorders, Law Enforcement, Recovery Support
Document Type:
Public Notice
Institution:
Department of Law and Public Safety
Author:
Office of the Attorney General
Target Audience:
County Prosecutors, Law Enforcement, Recovery Specialists, Healthcare Partners
Period of Effectiveness:
September 1, 2021 - August 31, 2022
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Referral for support services
Document type:
Referral form
Organization / Institution:
Helping Hands
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Individuals self-referring or organizations referring clients
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Organisation applying:
ARD-ACTION FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT
Funding mechanism:
The Danish Emergency Relief Fund (DERF)
Administering body:
CISU
Country:
Somalia
Region:
Baardheere
Locality:
Caqaqable village
Nearby town:
Baardheere
River:
Juba River
Type of document:
Humanitarian intervention application form
Intervention modality:
Rapid Response
Target group:
110 households (approx. 770 individuals)
Duration of intervention:
4 months
Sectors:
Food security, nutrition, agriculture, protection
Main activities:
Distribution of food, seeds, and milk powder for children under 3 years
Environmental consideration:
Environment marker based on the “do no harm” principle
Note:
Study Summary 1.1 Please provide a brief summary of the study in the table below. A complete description of the study with detailed information should be provided in the body of the protocol. For sections not applicable to the study, mark them as N/A. Study Title Study Design Primary Objective/Purpose Secondary Objective(s)/Purposes Research Intervention(s) ClinicalTrials.gov NCT # Study Population Sample Size Study Duration for individual subjects Study Specific Abbreviations/ Definitions
Background 3.1 Provide the scientific or scholarly background for, rationale for, and significance of the research based on the existing literature and how will it add to existing knowledge. :
this section should be limited to only information directly related to the research questions and objectives. Do not include your full dissertation proposal. 3.2 Describe any relevant preliminary data (e.g. pilot data).
Procedures Involved 5.1 Describe and explain the study design. 5.2 Please select the methods that will be employed in this study (select all that apply):
☐ Audio/Video Recording ☐ Psychophysiological Recording ☐ Behavioral Interventions ☐ Record Review - Educational ☐ Behavioral Observations and Experimentations ☐ Record Review - Employee ☐ Deception ☐ Record Review- Medical ☐ Focus Groups ☐ Record Review - Other ☐ Interviews ☐ Specimen Collection or Analysis ☐ Investigational Medical Device – (e.g. Medical Mobile Applications) ☐ Surveys and/or Questionnaires ☐Psychometric Testing ☐ Other Social-Behavioral Procedures Provide a description of all research procedures being performed and when they are performed. (Upload any surveys, questionnaires, interview scripts, focus group scripts, debriefing scripts, psychometric tests, stimulus materials, intervention manuals, and data collection forms on the Local Site Documents page in the IRB application.) 5.3 Describe the procedures or interventions that are going to be conducted as part of the research project, but that would have been conducted anyway, even if the research was not occurring (i.e. standard of care procedures, activities that would occur in a classroom). 5.4 Describe the procedures performed to lessen the probability or magnitude of risks of items selected in 5.2.5. 5 If accessing or collecting existing data, describe: The data that will be collected during the study (e.g. demographics, medical history, etc.). Attach the data capture sheet(s) on the Local Site Documents page in the IRB application. How the data will be obtained, including how you have the authority to access the data. The source or location of the data (e.g. USF Epic, TGH Epic, Hillsborough County School records, CANVAS records, publicly available databases, etc.). 5.6 If collecting and/or analyzing biological specimens, describe: How the biological specimens will be or have been collected. How the biological specimens will be stored. How long the biological specimens will be stored. How the biological specimens will be used. The laboratories that will be used. Whether the collected biological specimens will undergo genetic testing. If so, indicate if this study is part of a Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) and whether the data will be forwarded to the NIH dbGaP. 5.7 If there are plans for long-term follow-up (once all research related procedures are complete), what data will be collected during this period.
Data and Specimen Storage for Future Research 6.1 If data or specimens will be banked for future research studies, describe where the data or specimens will be stored, how long it/they will b:
the process to request a release, approvals required for release, who can obtain data or specimens, and the data to be provided with specimens.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2026
Region / City:
South Carolina
Subject:
Volunteerism, Community Service, Nonprofit Organizations
Document Type:
Resolution
Organization / Institution:
South Carolina House of Representatives
Author:
Members of the South Carolina House of Representatives
Target Audience:
General Public, Community Members, Students
Effective Period:
January 20, 2026
Approval Date:
January 20, 2026
Amendment Date:
None